Introduction
Palms are an important element in the dynamics of tropical ecosystems: e.g., by influencing the distribution and behavior of animals, which could affect other ecosystem functions, such as plant regeneration (Salm, Jalles-Filho, & Schuck-Paim, 2005; Beck, 2007; Keuroghlian & Eaton, 2009) and soil properties (Young, Raab, McCauley, Briggs, & Dirso, 2010). Palms are a vital food source for many animal species (e.g., Zona & Henderson, 1989; Peres, 1994; Galetti, Ziparro, & Morellato, 1999; Scariot, 1999; Genini, Galetti, & Morellato, 2009; Giombini, Bravo, & Tosto, 2016). They also play an important role for human populations, which use them as a source of food, raw construction materials, and for making a variety of implements, among many other uses (e.g., Bernal, 1992; Henderson, Galeano, & Bernal, 1995; Johnson, 2011; Bernal & Galeano, 2013).
The Quindío wax palm, Ceroxylon quindiuense, is an abundant species in the cloud forests of Colombia and Perú. In Colombia, it grows in the three Andean ranges, although it is more abundant in the Central Cordillera. Its largest populations are located in the Tochecito River basin, in the municipalities of Cajamarca and Ibagué, Department of Tolima (Bernal, Galeano, & Sanín, 2015), where the number of adults has been estimated between 256 000 (Jiménez, 2017) and 600 000 individuals (Bernal et al., 2015; Instituto Humboldt, 2016).
C. quindiuense is recognized worldwide for being the world’s tallest palm, reaching 60 m in height (Bernal, Martínez, & Sanín, 2018), and Colombia’s national tree. It is considered Endangered (EN) (Galeano & Bernal, 2005), mainly due to habitat transformation as result of human activities, especially agricultural expansion. Conservation of this species requires a thorough understanding of its population dynamics and phenological cycles, as well as of the underlying factors.
Phenology studies the occurrence of repetitive biological events and the biotic and abiotic environmental factors that control them. A better understanding of the phenology of a plant species makes it possible to evaluate, for instance, flower and fruit availability for the local fauna (e.g., Morellato et al., 2000; Cabrera & Wallace, 2007), or litter production for soil formation and nutrient input (e.g., Vitousek, 1984; Sayer et al., 2020), all of which are fundamental aspects to understand forest dynamics.
Although the conservation and management plan for C. quindiuense in Colombia (Bernal et al., 2015) stresses the need to conduct phenological studies, only a single short-term work performed by Girón-Vanderhuck, Salazar, and Agudelo (2001a) is available. In this paper we present the results of a two-year phenological study carried out along an altitudinal gradient in the Tochecito River basin, in the Central Cordillera of Colombia, where the largest palm stands of this species are found. We describe leaf production rate, and flowering and fruiting cycles, and contrast them among elevations. We also calculate the food offer for the fauna, as a tool for the proper management of this species in the area. As temperature in the tropical Andes decreases by ca. 0.6º per 100 m increase in elevation (Ramírez, Roldán, & Yépez, 2004), this change in temperature is expected to influence phenology along the gradient. Because no similar studies appear to have been made in the Andes, we expected differences in parameters to occur, but did not have any clue of the direction of variation, if any. We hypothesized that the flowering sequence along the gradient would somehow be similar to the sequential flowering of several Ceroxylon species, described by Carreño-Barrera, Madriñán, and Núñez-Avellaneda (2013).
Materials and methods
Study area: The study area is in the Tochecito River basin, in the Department of Tolima, on the Eastern slope of the Central Cordillera of Colombia (4°30’45”-4°31’34” N & 75°30’29”-75°26’31” W), between 2 400 and 3 000 m elevation (Fig. 1). It is a mountain area of 8 890 ha, of which 43 % have some type of palm cover (cloud forest remnants or secondary forests dominated by very dense palm stands, cloud forest remnants or secondary forests with some palms, matrix of pastures and crops with very dense palm stands, and matrix of pastures and crops with some palms) (Instituto Humboldt, 2016). The rainfall regime is bimodal, with the rainiest period between June and November, and the driest period between February and March (IDEAM, 2020).
Study species: Ceroxylon quindiuense is a single-stemmed palm, reaching up to 60 m in height (Bernal et al., 2018) and 36 cm in diameter at breast height. Its crown consists of 12-27 blue-green leaves, with the pinnae covered on the underside by a woolly whitish indument. It is a dioecious species, although, in some cases, individuals change sex (Martínez, Sanín, Castillo, López, & Bernal, 2018). The inflorescences are interfoliar, repeatedly branched, supported by a long peduncle, and bearing several thousand small, whitish flowers, which have anthesis almost simultaneously for one to a few days (personal observation, 2012 to 2020; Carreño-Barrera et al., 2013). Although the flowers of both sexes look very similar, staminate and pistillate inflorescences are easily recognized, even from a great distance. Pistillate inflorescences remain with their rachillae completely extended, at a wide angle with the rachis, even after fruiting and falling to the ground. In the staminate inflorescences, on the other hand, the rachillae are closely appressed to the rachis after anthesis, so that the old inflorescences have a broom-like appearance (Martínez et al., 2018). Each palm produces several infructescences simultaneously and each one bears thousands of spherical fruits, 1-2 cm in diameter, smooth and orange-red when ripe (Galeano & Bernal, 2010; Sanín & Galeano, 2011).
Data collection: We surveyed four sites located at intervals of 200 meters along an elevation gradient starting at 2 400 m.a.s.l. and ending at 3 000 m.a.s.l., (2 400, 2 600, 2 800 and 3 000 m.a.s.l., Fig. 1). At each elevation, individuals were selected within a range of +/- 25 m with respect to the elevation value. The 2 400 m site was established in a secondary forest and the remaining sites were established in pastures with isolated palm trees, overgrown pastures, or forest edge (Fig. 2).
Adult Quindío wax palms emerge out of the forest canopy. For this reason, observing the crowns from within the forest is almost impossible; however, casual observations in the area over several years have shown that palms growing in both forests and pastures follow the same phenological pattern (timing, duration, frequency and intensity in leafing, flowering, and fruiting) (personal observation from 2005 through 2018). The individuals in this study were thus selected in clean pastures with cattle presence, overgrown pastures, or secondary forests, in which the palm crowns were visible (Fig. 2).
At each sampling site, 40 adult individuals 20-40 meters tall were chosen (20 staminate and 20 pistillate), taking a random initial individual and thereafter selecting the closest neighbor that was within the elevation belt of 50 m described above. Each individual was marked with an aluminum plate tied to the stem with a nylon thread, at a height of 1.6 m above the ground.
We made observations of reproductive structures using binoculars and photographs. The phenological data were recorded bimonthly between October 2017 and October 2019. In each of the selected individuals, the presence of reproductive structures was evaluated, taking into account the following phenophases: bud: reproductive structure wrapped in the peduncular bracts; flower: inflorescence composed of yellowish-white flowers at anthesis; old inflorescence: inflorescence in which almost 100 % of the flowers have fallen and only the axes remain; immature fruits: infructescence with well-formed fruits, which have reached their final size but are still green; ripe fruits: infructescence in which almost all fruits are orange-red; old infructescence: infructescence that has lost 100 % of its fruits and of which only the axes remain. During the observations, the ripe fruits category was divided into three subcategories, which were pooled for some of the analyses: ripe fruits 1: ripe infructescence in which more than 50 % of the fruits persist; ripe fruits 2: ripe infructescence in which 20-50 % of the fruits persist; ripe fruits 3: ripe infructescence in which less than 20 % of the fruits persist.
To follow the development of each of the reproductive structures, we took its position in the crown, choosing a fixed point in the terrain, from which the crown was seen as a clock dial, in which the structures were located in a clockwise direction, starting from six. The apex of the reproductive structure was taken as an indicator of the position on the dial. Each crown was observed from different angles to corroborate the structure’s stage.
In addition to the reproductive stage, we recorded leaf production for each individual at altitudes of 2 600, 2 800, and 3 000 m. To do this, we followed 84 palms (37, 18 and 29 individuals, respectively) over 18 months, counting, in each observation, the number of fallen leaves found around the palm’s base. Once counted, fallen leaves were removed from the place to facilitate the next count. The number of fallen leaves between two observations was assumed to correspond to the number of leaves produced by the palm, since in the long term, the number of leaves on the crown remains constant (Tomlinson, 1963; Corner, 1966). Leaf production was not followed at the 2 400 m site, as it lay on a very steep and inaccessible slope, which could be observed with binoculars and photographed, but in which the palms were inaccessible. Additionally, to know the contribution of biomass to the basin, we weighed all fallen leaves and old inflorescences and infructescences in the August 2019 observation. To estimate the number of fruits per infructescence, we randomly took six ripe infructescences fallen on the ground, from which we removed and counted all fruits. The fresh and dry weight of 100 fruits and their respective seeds were obtained, to calculate the total weight of the food supply offered by the palms.
Data analysis: Since palms present a structure composed of successive leaf-inflorescence-internode modules (Henderson, 2002), the development of each of their reproductive structures (buds, inflorescences, and infructescences) can be followed individually. As floral anthesis lasts only 2-3 days (personal observation from 2005 through 2018; Carreño-Barrera et al., 2013; Carreño-Barrera, Núñez-Avellaneda, Sanín, & Campos, 2020), and our observations were bimonthly, the probability of finding an inflorescence at anthesis during the observation period was low. For this reason, for each reproductive structure, the month of its flowering was interpolated between the last observation in which it was found in bud and the appearance of a structure with early developing fruits.
On the other hand, the total development time from flower to ripe fruits observed in 211 inflorescences at the 2 600, 2 800, and 3 000 m elevations was taken as the median value for each site. This value was applied retrospectively to those structures that were in ripe fruit at the time when our observations started in October 2017, and prospectively to those in flowering in October 2019. In this way, the data taken to the pistillate individuals for 24 months allowed us to extrapolate the behavior of the flowering cycles twelve months backwards until October 2016, and eight months forward, until June 2020. Thus, flowering and fruiting cycles in pistillate individuals in this study cover almost four years. At the 2 400 m elevation, only the data of the single individual that had a complete cycle were used. For the staminate inflorescences, due to their ephemeral nature, no extrapolations or interpolations could be done.
The duration of the fruiting period was determined as the number of months between the appearance of ripe infructescences in any of the three states (ripe fruits 1, 2 or 3) and the fall of all fruits (old infructescence). To determine the fruiting peaks at each elevation, only ripe infructescences with almost 100 % of their fruits (ripe fruits 1) were considered, to avoid counting the same infructescence in two consecutive observations.
The development time of female reproductive structures from pistillate flower to ripe fruit at each elevation was taken as the median number of months it took the pistillate inflorescences for which a complete cycle was observed (i.e., from the appearance of flowers to the appearance of ripe fruits 1).
As our data were not normally distributed, we used Kruskal-Wallis tests to compare the development time from flower to ripe fruit, and leaf production between the different elevations, and between sexes. We used Spearman correlation to correlate precipitation data with flowering and fruiting. We used circular statistics to evaluate seasonality in the C. quindiuense reproductive phenology and also to find differences in the seasonal patterns among altitudes. This circular statistic requires months to be transformed to angles (Zar, 1999; Morellato et al., 2000). As our field observations indicate that C. quindiuense shows a 2-year reproductive cycle, we used intervals of 15 degrees between months, being November 2019: 7.5° and October 2019: 352.5°. We dismissed the October 2017 data in the circular analysis as we only considered a 24-month cycle in the statistics.
The circular statistical analyses were done using the ORIANA v.4.02 software (Kovach, 1994). The evaluated parameters were: mean vector, length of mean vector, median, and circular standard deviation. As some of our data are not normally distributed (they do not match the von Mises distribution), we used the Rao’s non-parametric test (U) for uniformity at each elevation and for every type of reproductive structure (i.e., pistillate inflorescences, staminate inflorescences and infructescences). This test points out the probability of the data being randomly distributed. If the test rejects the hypothesis of uniformity, it means that the studied population shows seasonality in its reproduction. Then, we used the Watson U2 non-parametric test to compare seasonality among the different elevations and for each type of reproductive structure. Here, the hypothesis is that the mean vectors of the two sampled populations are not significantly different. If this hypothesis is rejected, it means the reproductive phenology is asynchronical between altitudes (Morellato et al., 2000). Only field data were included in the statistical treatments.
Results
Development time of the 211 reproductive structures from pistillate flower to ripe fruit ranged from seven to eleven months and differed among sites (Table 1). It took longer for the individuals at 2 800 and 3 000 m than for those at 2 400 and 2 600 m (χ² = 84.737). There were significant differences between 2 600 and 2 800 m (P = 7.3e-14) and between 2 600 and 3 000 m (P = 2.2e-16), but not between 2 800 and 3 000 m.
Elevation (m.a.s.l.) | Number of inflorescences with a full cycle observed (number of individuals) | Duration (Months) | ||
Range | Median | |||
2 400 | 1 (1) | 7 | ||
2 600 | 50 (11) | 7-11 | 8 | |
2 800 | 74 (13) | 8-13 | 11 | |
3 000 | 86 (14) | 8-12 | 11 |
The observed events and the corresponding extrapolations showed that between October 2016 and June 2020 there were two major pistillate flowering events and two major fruiting events in the Tochecito River basin. The flowering events happened between October 2016 and August 2017 and between August 2018 and February 2019. The fruiting events took place between September 2017 and April 2018 and between May 2019 and January 2020 (Fig. 3).
During the 24 months analyzed with circular statistics, flowering and fruiting showed a seasonal behavior for all the elevations (Rao’s Spacing Test (U) P < 0.01, length of mean vector > 0.6). Only female palms at 2 400 showed no flowering peaks (U = 180, 0.1 > P > 0.01), possibly explained by the low number of pistillate flowers recorded at this site (6 female inflorescences) (Table 2). Furthermore, flowering and fruiting peak events were significantly different among all elevations (Watson U2 test, Table 3), supporting the idea that this palm population has an altitudinally sequential reproductive phenology (Table 3).
Elevation (m.a.s.l.) | Observations (N) | Mean vector (month-year) | Length of mean vector (r) | Median (month-year) | Circular SD | Rao’s Spacing Test (U) | Rao’s Spacing Test (p) |
Staminate inflorescences | |||||||
2 400 | 12 | 95.6° | 0.718 | 67.5° | 46.6° | 255 | < 0.01 |
(May-18) | (Mar-18) | ||||||
2 600 | 114 | 158.3° | 0.583 | 172.5° | 59.5° | 315.789 | < 0.01 |
(Sep-18) | (Oct-18) | ||||||
2 800 | 143 | 157.3° | 0.292 | 187.5° | 89.9° | 322.238 | < 0.01 |
(Sep-18) | (Nov-18) | ||||||
3 000 | 168 | 183.9° | 0.164 | 202.5° | 109.0° | 317.143 | < 0.01 |
(Nov-18) | (Dec-18) | ||||||
Pistillate inflorescences | |||||||
2 400 | 6 | 154.6° | 0.613 | 172.5° | 56.7° | 180 | 0.10 > P > 0.05 |
(Sep-18) | (Oct-18) | ||||||
2 600 | 54 | 175.4° | 0.97 | 187.5° | 14.2° | 333.333 | < 0.01 |
(Oct-18) | (Nov-18) | ||||||
2 800 | 104 | 186.9° | 0.655 | 187.5° | 52.7° | 321.923 | < 0.01 |
(Nov-18) | (Nov-18) | ||||||
3 000 | 137 | 221.0° | 0.65 | 232.5° | 53.2° | 336.35 | < 0.01 |
(Jan-19) | (Feb-19) | ||||||
Infructescences | |||||||
2 400 | 75 | 32.3° | 0.886 | 37.5° | 28.2° | 321.6 | < 0.01 |
(Jan-18) | (Jan-18) | ||||||
2 600 | 60 | 308.1° | 0.85 | 307.5° | 32.7° | 318 | < 0.01 |
(Jul-19) | (Jul-19) | ||||||
2 800 | 176 | 2.9° | 0.802 | 7.5° | 38.1° | 335.455 | < 0.01 |
(Nov-17) | (Nov-17) | ||||||
3 000 | 117 | 43.8° | 0.766 | 52.5° | 41.8° | 326.154 | < 0.01 |
(Jan-18) | (Feb-18) |
Elevation (m.a.s.l.) | 2 400 | 2 600 | 2 800 | 3 000 |
2 400 | - | SF < 0.05 PF < 0.05 IF < 0.001 | SF < 0.001 PF < 0.05 IF < 0.001 | SF < 0.002 PF < 0.01 IF < 0.001 |
2 600 | SF: 0.225 PF: 0.225 IF: 2.947 | - | SF < 0.001 PF < 0.02 IF < 0.001 | All < 0.001 |
2 800 | SF: 0.524 PF: 0.206 IF: 2.486 | SF: 1.098 PF: 0.243 IF: 3.358 | - | All < 0.001 |
3 000 | SF: 0.359 PF: 0.286 IF: 1.718 | SF: 1.772 PF: 4.22 IF: 3.629 | SF: 0.461 PF: 5.444 IF: 4.984 | - |
U2 scores (lower half) and probabilities (upper half). SF: Staminate inflorescences, PF: Pistillate inflorescences, and IF: Infructescences.
During each flowering and fruiting event, the peaks were not simultaneous at the different elevations. For the first major event (2016-2017), the flowering peak took place first at 2 800 m in January 2017, followed by 2 600 m in February, 3 000 m in March and ending at 2 400 m in June. However, because the flower-to-fruit development time was different among elevations (Table 1), the order of appearance of the fruiting peaks along the gradient was not the same as that of flowering peaks. The first peak of ripe fruits started at 2 600 m in October 2017, and from there advanced upward to 2 800 m (December) and downward to 2 400 m (January 2018), ending at 3 000 m in February 2018.
During the second major event, flowering had a first peak at 2 400 m in October 2018, although with just three inflorescences, at 2 600 and 2 800 m in November, and 3 000 m in February 2019. Fruiting peaks started at 2 400 m in May 2019 and ascended along the gradient to 2 600 m (June), 2 800 m (October), ending at 3 000 m in January 2020. For each elevation, 24 months elapsed between the two major flowering peaks and 22-24 months between the two major fruiting peaks (Fig. 3). In the first major fruiting event there were 369 infructescences, whereas in the second major event they were 256 (Fig. 3). Because of the steep terrain, the great abundance of palms and the strikingness of ripe infructescences, the altitudinal shift of the fruiting process is an appealing feature of the basin’s landscape.
In addition to the two major flowering events mentioned above, there were two minor ones: the first between October 2017 and April 2018, and another between July and September 2019. At the peaks of these events, the number of inflorescences produced was 6-24 times smaller than in the major ones. During these minor events, there were no inflorescences at some sites (Fig. 4).
Furthermore, the reproductive behavior of pistillate individuals was clearly related to elevation (Watson U2 test, Table 3). While the number of palms that went through two flowering and fruiting cycles increased uphill (4 individuals at 2 400 m, 11 individuals at 2 600 m, 15 individuals at 2 800 m, 20 individuals at 3 000 m, N = 80 individuals), the number of palms with a single cycle decreased (16 individuals at 2 400 m, 9 individuals at 2 600 m, 4 individuals at 2 800 m, 0 individuals at 3 000 m, N = 80 individuals). The total number of infructescences per cycle also increased with elevation (cycle one: 74 infructescences at 2 400 m, 85 infructescences at 2 600 m, 115 infructescences at 2 800 m, 105 infructescences at 3 000 m, N = 80 individuals; cycle two: 5 infructescences at 2 400 m, 54 infructescences at 2 600 m, 59 infructescences at 2 800 m, 114 infructescences at 3 000 m, N = 80 individuals), regardless of the number of cycles.
The average number of inflorescences produced per individual for the first major flowering event was 5.3 (N = 72, SD = 2.1) and, for the second, 5.1 (N = 50, SD = 2.3). Not all individuals flowered and fruited in every reproductive event. During the study period, 60 % of the 80 pistillate individuals went through two flowering and fruiting cycles, whereas 39 % only one. A single individual, at 2 800 m elevation, went through three flowering cycles (December 2016, January 2018, November 2018).
The average number of infructescences produced per individual for the two major fruiting events was 5.3 (N1 = 69, N2 = 50, SD1, SD2 = 2.2). The average number of fruits per infructescence was 4 465 (N = 6, SD = 1 488). The fresh weight of each fruit was on average 2.5 g (N = 100, SD = 0.3 g) and the weight of the edible fleshy pericarp was 1.15 g (N = 100).
The data for staminate inflorescences cannot be extrapolated, so we only included two-year data. Furthermore, because of the ephemeral anthesis of the inflorescence and the persistence of old inflorescences for several months (personal observation; Carreño-Barrera et al., 2013), it was not easy to individually monitor each structure in its old inflorescence stage. For this reason, we only considered those inflorescences that we observed at anthesis or whose flowering had evidently taken place a few days before our observation. During the two years of our study, there were always at least a few staminate inflorescences in the basin. At our sampling sites, there were only two months (March and August 2019) in which no palm had any inflorescences.
But amid this year-round staminate flowering, two groups of well-defined peaks were evident at each altitude (Fig. 4) (Rao’s Spacing Test P < 0.01, length of mean vector > 0.1). At elevations 2 800 and 3 000 m., the length of the mean vector had values close to zero (0.292 and 0.164, respectively), which shows that although there is a seasonality, it is not very well marked. A minor peak occurred between January and March 2018, and another one, almost twice as large, between October 2018 and February 2019. The largest of these groups of peaks coincided with the second major pistillate flowering event. The smaller of them largely matched the minor pistillate flowering event between January and April 2018 (Fig. 4).
The number of leaves in the crown was 12-27 (Me = 18, SD = 2.4, N = 160) and the median number of leaves produced per individual in 18 months was eight (N = 83, SD = 2.2), that is, 5.3 leaves per year (one leaf every 69 days). There was no difference in leaf production rate among elevations (χ2 = 1.9844, P = 0.3708), or between staminate and pistillate individuals (χ2 = 0.45817, P = 0.4985). Each fallen leaf weighted 2.86 kg on average (N = 66, SD = 1.3 kg). On the other hand, the average weight of an old male inflorescence was 1.84 kg (N = 20, SD = 1.12 kg), whereas old infructescences weighted 2.35 kg (N = 15, SD = 0.97 kg).
Although the overall trend of flowering graphically suggests a higher production of female inflorescences when rainfall decreases (Fig. 5), statistically there was no significant correlation (RS = -0.107236, P = 0.4832). The number of infructescences produced in the basin and the precipitation did not show a statistically significant correlation either (RS = -0.0105917, P = 0.9449).
Discussion
The sequential flowering of C. quindiuense along the altitudinal gradient at our study site probably plays the same role as the orchestrated flowering of several species growing along a gradient elsewhere in the Colombian Andes, as described by Carreño-Barrera et al. (2020), as a mechanism to enhance pollination. The staminate flowers of C. quindiuense are a vital food source and a place of reproduction for several species of nitidulid beetles of the genus Mystrops, the main pollinators of Ceroxylon species (Carreño-Barrera et al., 2020). The insects and the palms maintain a close relationship of pollinator-plant specificity that makes them highly dependent on each other. To maintain pollinator populations, palms of the genus Ceroxylon have developed strategies that allow them to have a constant supply of pollen for the beetles. Where several Ceroxylon species co-occur, one of these strategies is the asynchronous flowering of the different Ceroxylon species along the gradient, so that there is a steady offer of flowers over a long period of time (Carreño-Barrera et al., 2020).
At our study area, however, this strategy would not work, as there is only one other species of Ceroxylon in the basin, C. parvifrons, represented by just a handful of individuals (ca. ten detected by us so far), growing above the upper limit of the large stands of C. quindiuense. A long-term phenological study of C. quindiuense along an elevational gradient, in an area where other species of the genus co-occur, as in Southern Colombia, would help to test this hypothesis.
During the seven-month flowering season of C. quindiuense at our study sites, the populations of nitidulids probably migrate along the altitudinal gradient, following the offer of food and breeding sites. In the months when flowering is less abundant, the populations of Mystrops spp. probably undergo a significant decline, and these insects would survive on the isolated palms that flower asynchronously throughout the year. This pattern of isolated flowering individuals that maintain the pollinator’s population has also been found for staphylinids associated with Phytelephas macrocarpa (as P. seemannii), another dioecious palm related to Ceroxylon (Bernal & Ervik, 1996). Thus, highly specialized nitidulid species associated with wax palms depend on healthy and large population of their hosts for local persistence. As wax palm populations dwindle, there will be lesser chances for these beetle species to survive.
Another strategy for maintaining pollinator populations in our study area is probably the reproductive alternation between individuals in the population over the years. Whereas 60 % of the observed individuals went through two flowering cycles during the 44 months of the study, 39 % of them went through a single cycle. The gradual increase, along the elevation gradient, both in the number of individuals with two cycles and in the total number of infructescences produced, results in an altitudinal shift of the number of flowers and fruits available in the basin.
Moreover, the finding of an individual that had three flowering cycles and another that only flowered in abundance once after many months of having no reproductive evidence suggests that there could be at least three flowering frequencies in the basin, with different amplitudes. The occasional synchrony of these three frequencies would explain the periodic occurrence of a large C. quindiuense fruiting event in the Central Cordillera of Colombia, which has been reported to happen every six to seven years (Bernal et al., 2015).
On the other hand, the number of infructescences produced by the palms in each cycle was not the same. In the second fruiting cycle, the total number of infructescences at our study sites decreased from 399 to 262. This alternation of high with lower production cycles, in which not all individuals produce fruits, is probably related to the severe stress suffered by the palms after a mass fruiting event (Bernal et al., 2015). In individuals that produce seven to nine infructescences, several leaves dry off shortly after the fruiting season, giving the palm a sickly appearance; however, palms recover completely after a few months. Those palms do not produce so many infructescences in their next cycle, or even do not produce any infructescence at all, as might be the case with individuals that had only one cycle.
The anomalous behavior of the sampling site located at 2 400 m is particularly interesting. This site had a different male:female ratio than the other three sites (2:3 vs. 1:1); five individuals that changed sex (four from male to female and one from female to male) (Martínez et al., 2018); and an adult individual that never exhibited any reproductive structures. Moreover, this site had the highest number of palms with a single fruiting cycle and the lowest total number of infructescences. Interestingly, the 2 400 m site is at the lower limit of the huge palm stands of this basin; although C. quindiuense is distributed there from 2 000 to 3 100 m, only isolated individuals are found below 2 400 m, often on very steep slopes.
The number of adult palms in the Tochecito River basin has been estimated between 256 158 (Jiménez, 2017) and 600 000 (Bernal et al., 2015; Instituto Humboldt, 2016), and the proportion of pistillate individuals to staminate between 1:1 (Girón-Vanderhuck et al., 2001a; Sanín, 2013; Sanín, Anthelme, Pintaud, Galeano, & Bernal, 2013; Bernal et al., 2015) and 1:2 (Jiménez, 2017). Table 4 shows the estimated fruit production, based on data reported by Jiménez (2017) and Bernal et al. (2015) and Instituto Humboldt (2016), taking the area reported by Castillo and Díaz (2016).
Source for estimation of the number of individuals and the proportion of sexes | Number of adult female individuals | Number of infructescences produced | Number of fruits | Overall weight of the edible fleshy pericarp (t) |
Jiménez (2017) | 85 385 | 452 540 | 2 020 293 333 | 2 324 |
Bernal et al. (2015) | 300 000 | 1 590 000 | 7 099 350 000 | 8 164 |
Ceroxylon quindiuense fruits are consumed by numerous species of birds, as Green Jay (Cyanocorax yncas), Crimson-Rumped Toucanet (Aulacorhynchus prasinus), Black-Billed Mountain Toucan (Andigena nigrirostris), thrushes (Turdus spp.), parrots (Hapalopsittaca fuertesi, H. amazonina and Ognorhynchus icterotis) (Galeano & Bernal, 2010; Sanín & Galeano, 2011; Bernal et al., 2015). The huge number of fruits produced during a fruiting event (between 2.0 and 7.1 billion fruits) represents a supply of edible pulp of 2 324-8 164 tons over an eight-month period. The altitudinal shift of this food supply should have a tremendous impact on the associated fauna and probably causes altitudinal migrations of animals in the basin, as has already been documented for other plant species at various sites (e.g., Levey, 1988; Loiselle & Blake, 1991; Laps, 1996; Kimura, Yumoto, & Kikuzawa, 2001; Malizia, 2001; Castro, Galetti, & Morellato, 2007).
During the twelve months in which few or no fruits of C. quindiuense are available in the basin, the frugivores must turn to other food sources. In the Tochecito River basin there are at least 237 species of trees and shrubs (Girón-Vanderhuck, Agudelo, & Macías, 2001b), among which we have identified at least 101, mainly in the families Solanaceae, Melastomataceae, Myrsinaceae, Rubiaceae and Lauraceae; that could be potential food sources for the fauna in times when Ceroxylon fruits are not available. Information on the phenological cycles of these species and the quantification of their food supply are vital for understanding the spatial and temporal dynamics of the fauna associated with C. quindiuense.
Besides its impact on the populations of pollinators and frugivores, C. quindiuense has another major effect on the ecosystems in the double-canopy forests of this basin, where the palms make “a forest above the forest”. With the large number of adult palms, each producing 5.3 leaves per year and each of these with an associated old inflorescence or old infructescence, the palm’s contribution of biomass to the basin (not including flowers and fruits) is estimated to be 6 605-15 739 tons per year, i.e., ca. 3-7.2 tons per hectare. This astonishing amount of biomass, coming from an extra emergent canopy (not including that from the forest canopy below) could make Tochecito and its palm-rich forests one of the most productive ecosystems in the high Andes. For example, Vitousek (1984) and Wallis et al. (2019) have reported annual values of 3.7 to 11.6 tons of litter production per hectare in what we assume are single-canopy Neotropical mountain forests. Furthermore, the large size and weight of the leaves and old infructescences, and their fall from heights greater than 40 m, undoubtedly have an important role in shaping regeneration in the palm-dominated forests. Because of this, conserving Ceroxylon quindiuense in the Tochecito River basin is vital for conserving the whole ecosystem in the area.
Ethical statement: authors declare that they all agree with this publication and made significant contributions; that there is no conflict of interest of any kind; and that we followed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures and requirements. All financial sources are fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgements section. A signed document has been filed in the journal archives.