SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue1Sobralia aryaelizabethiana (Orchidaceae), a small and unusual new species from northwestern Peru author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Lankesteriana

On-line version ISSN 1409-3871

Lankesteriana vol.25 n.1 Cartago Jan./Apr. 2025

http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/lank.v25i1.62821 

Article

A new miniature ghost appears in the Dominican Republic

James D. Ackerman1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-4374

Eladio Fernández
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8684-6899

Betsaida Cabrera2  3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-0688

Normandie González-Orellana1 
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5359-6401

1Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico, 17 Avenida Universidad Suite 1701, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00925-2537, U.S.A.

2Jardín Botánico Nacional Rafael M. Moscoso, Avenida República de Colombia, Santo Domingo, Distrito Nacional, República Dominicana.

3Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Avenida Cayetano Germosén, Santo Domingo, Distrito Nacional, República Dominicana.

Abstract

A small population of an epiphytic orchid in the leafless genus Dendrophylax was discovered in the valley of Río Amina, on the northwestern side of the Cordillera Central of the Dominican Republic. The tiny yellow to yellow-green flowers proved to be unique and therefore we describe here the new species as D. pustulatus, for the brown ellipsoid pustules of the inflorescence and ovary, the 90° bend at the transition between the pedicel and ovary, the simple mid lobe of the lip, and a laterally flattened spur not exceeding the length of the ovary. Based on morphology, D. pustulatus appears to be closely allied with D. constanzensis and D. serpentilingua. Dendrophylax now has 16 species, 12 of which are present in Hispaniola and half of those are endemic to the island.

Keywords: Angraecinae; Dendrophylax; Dominican Republic; ghost orchids; Orchidaceae; orchid flora

Resumen

En el valle del Río Amina, en el noroeste de la Cordillera Central de la República Dominicana, se descubrió una pequeña población de orquídeas epífitas sin hojas del género Dendrophylax. Las diminutas flores de color amarillo a verde amarillento resultaron ser únicas y por eso describimos aquí la nueva especie como D. pustulatus, por las pústulas elipsoides de color marrón de la inflorescencia y el ovario, la curva de 90° en la transición entre el pedicelo y el ovario, el lóbulo medio del labio simple y un espolón aplanado lateralmente que no excede el largo del ovario. Según su morfología, D. pustulatus parece estar estrechamente relacionada con D. constanzensis y D. serpentilingua. Dendrophylax cuenta actualmente con 16 especies, 12 de las cuales están presentes en La Española y la mitad de ellas son endémicas de la isla.

Palabras clave: Angraecinae; Dendrophylax; Orchidaceae; orquídeas fantasmas; orquideoflora; República Dominicana

Introduction

The genus Dendrophylax Rchb.f. (Epidendroideae: Vandeae: Angraecinae), commonly known as “ghost orchids”, currently consists of 15 species distributed primarily in the Greater Antilles but with two species that have ventured north to Florida (USA) (D. lindenii (Lindl.) Benth. ex Rolfe, D. porrectus (Rchb.f.) Carlsward & Whitten), and two occur in Megamexico (D. megarhizus Molgo & Carnevali, D. porrectus). Dendrophylax and its sister genus, Campylocentrum Benth., are the only two representatives of the subtribe Angraecinae in the western hemisphere.

Dendrophylax is epiphytic yet leafless at maturity, rendering them inconspicuous. Flowers are borne singly or on laxly flowered racemes or sparsely branched panicles (Campylocentrum has distichous, densely flowered racemes). Flowers are yellow, green, or white, spurred, and produce nectar as a pollinator reward. The stubby column has a split rostellum and the anther bears two independent, yellow pollinia with separate stipes (hemipollinaria). The larger species have spectacular white, nocturnally fragrant flowers that seem to float in the understory as they are usually borne alone at the end of long, slender inflorescences; hence the name “ghost orchids” (Ackerman & Collaborators, 2014).

The center of Dendrophylax diversity is Hispaniola, which is home to 11 species, five of which are endemic. This matches the overall percent endemism for orchids on the island (44% for all orchids; 45% for Dendrophylax) (Ackerman & Collaborators, 2014). High endemism is not only characteristic of the orchid flora of Hispaniola, but also prevalent across many plant and animal groups making Hispaniola a major contributor to the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot (e.g., Powell et al., 1999; Santiago-Valentín & Olmstead 2004). Its geological diversity, physiographic and climatically fragmented landscape offers opportunities for population isolation where genetic drift and natural selection may occur without homogenizing effects of gene flow (Cano Carmona et al., 2010; Cano Ortiz et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2022; Tremblay et al., 2005).

While it is tempting to regard the Hispaniola as the evolutionary origin of the Dendrophylax, the phylogenetic evidence is equivocal. The earliest diverging clades have the most widespread species occupying multiple islands of the Greater Antilles: D. monteverdi (Rchb.f.) Ackerman & Nir (Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, Jamaica, and Cuba), D. barrettiae Fawc. & Rendle (Hispaniola, Jamaica, and Cuba), and D. porrectus (Puerto Rico, Hispaniola, Jamaica, Cuba, Florida, and Mexico) (Ackerman & Collaborators, 2014; Carlsward et al., 2006; Molgo et al., 2016). As for diversification of Dendrophylax, it likely diverged from Campylocentrum in the late Miocene (Farminhão et al., 2021). Unfortunately, diversification within Dendrophylax lacks clarity since only three morphologically disparate species of Dendrophylax have been assessed, and they diverged in the early to mid-Pliocene (Pessoa et al., 2018). Nonetheless, the phylogram depicting Dendrophylax phylogeny of Carlsward et al. (2006) showed short Fitch lengths, suggesting recent divergence of sister species occupying different islands (D. sallei of Hispaniola and D. lindenii of Cuba and Florida; D. fawcettii of the Cayman Islands and D. funalis of Jamaica).

We encountered a population of a small flowered Dendrophylax that we have concluded is an undescribed species, which we rectify here.

Taxonomic treatment

Dendrophylax pustulatus Ackerman & E.Fernández, sp. nov. (Fig. 1-2)

TYPE: República Dominicana. Cordillera Central: provincia Santiago, a 1 km en dirección este por el sendero, después de la caseta del Parque Nacional Armando Bermúdez, La Diferencia, frente a La Diferencia Eco-Retreat. A lo largo de la vegetación contigua al Río Amina. En pequeñas poblaciones a lo largo del sendero. Pico floral parece ser entre principios y mediados de Julio, 19°16”13”N, 71°03’07”W, elev. 735 m, 12 julio 2024, E. Fernández 23 (holotype: JBSD 138476; isotype: NY). Fig. 1-2.

Diagnosis: Dendrophylax pustulatus differs by a combination of characteristics from other small-flowered and short-spurred members of the genus, D. serpentilingua (Dod) Nir, and D. constanzensis (Garay) Nir. Dendrophylax pustulatus inflorescence has abundant ellipsoid pustules and an obovate retuse mid lobe of the lip, whereas the pubescence of D. serpentilingua is hispid and the mid lobe is ovate, apiculate and two-tailed, and D. contanzense is setaceous-hirsute, and the mid lobe is anchor-shaped, apiculate. Dendrophylax pustulatus also has a laterally compressed spur, a trait that is shared only with D. serpentilingua. Furthermore, D. pustulatus consistently has a 90° bend at the transition between the pedicel and ovary, not yet seen in other species of the genus.

Plant epiphytic, monopodial, leafless. Roots ca. 10 or more, green when wet, white to whitish green when dry, caespitose, 1.0-1.5 mm diam., up to 15 cm long, smooth. Rhizome largely obscured by roots, 5-10 mm long. Inflorescences erect, filiform, racemose or sparsely branched, 1-6 flowers produced in succession, usually 1 open at a time, densely provided with brown elliptical pustules; peduncle green, 17-30 mm long, 0.5 mm diam., comprised of 3 nodes, bracts brown, sheathing, acute, 1.5-2.0 mm long, progressively smaller toward the apex; rachis 5-15 mm long, somewhat fractiflex; floral bract 1.5-2.0 mm long. Flowers yellow to yellow green, in the resupinate position; pedicellate ovary geniculate; pedicel erect, 2.0-2.5 mm long, glabrous or with sparse brown pustules; ovary perpendicular to the pedicel, 1.5-2.0 mm long, ribbed, densely provided with brown pustules; sepals weakly pustulose/verrucose abaxially, entire; dorsal sepal ovate, obtuse, 1.9 × 1.2 mm, reflexed upward 0.5 mm from base; lateral sepals ovate, slightly oblique, acute, entire, 2.8-3 mm long, 1.8 mm wide; petals glabrous, flanking column, ovate, obtuse, 1.8 × 1.2 mm; lip glabrous, 3.0-3.5 mm long, excluding spur, superficially simple, obscurely trilobed, lateral lobes erect, flanking column, rounded, entire, creating a narrow entryway to spur, and meeting the mid lobe at about half the length of the lip, mid lobe obovate, rounded, retuse, ca. 2.0 mm long, 2.4 mm wide, disc callus a low elliptical bump in front of the column 0.7 mm long, spur 1.5-2.0 mm long × 1.0-1.2 mm deep, laterally compressed, truncate, parallel to ovary, abutting against the pedicel; column light green, stubby, 0.5 mm long; anther cap yellow with two brown spots, pollinia 2, globose, ca. 0.16 mm diam., attached to separate stipes and viscidia. Fruit pedicel ca. 4 mm long; capsule green with sparse, brown, elliptical pustules, fusiform, ribbed, slightly asymmetrical both basally and apically, 12-18 × 3.0-3.5 mm, dehiscence longitudinal along a single suture.

Illustrated by Bobbi Angell based on alcohol preserved specimen (later pressed and dried; E. Fernandez s.n., 28 Jun 2024; UPRRP) and Eladio Fernández photographs.

Figure 1. Dendrophylax pustulatus Ackerman & E.Fernández.  

Photographs by Eladio Fernández.

Figure 2 Dendrophylax pustulatus Ackerman & E.Fernández. 

Etymology: In reference to the brown, ellipsoid pustules on the peduncle and ovary.

Distribution: Dominican Republic: province Santiago; Cordillera Central.

Taxonomic discussion

It is not entirely clear which species are most related to D. pustulatus. The most complete phylogenetic analysis published to date is of Molgo et al. (2016) and they sampled nine species, only one of which, D. porrectus, is among the short-spurred species of the Dominican Republic. DNA of D. constanzensis, D. macrocarpus (Dod) Carlsward & Whitten, D. monteverdi, and D. serpentilingua have yet to be sequenced and included in phylogenetic analyses. Nonetheless, based on morphology, we expect D. pustulatus to be related to D. serpentilingua and D. constanzensis (Table 1). This brings the number of species in the genus to 16 and increases the number of Hispaniolan endemics to six.

Ecology: Plants are epiphytic on branches of small, broadleaf trees. The population appears to be about 60 plants distributed along the southern side of Río Amina and the western side of Río Dajao. Reproductive biology is largely unknown, but flowering peak appears between June and August, and plants are likely pollinator-dependent since fruit production is sparse. Fragrance production is unknown. Pollinators of only one Dendrophylax are known, the large-flowered D. lindenii, which is pollinated by hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in Florida (USA) (Ackerman et al., 2023; Danaher et al., 2019; Houlihan et al., 2019). It is unlikely that the small flowers of the present species are pollinated by the high energy-demanding sphingids. The tiny flowers of D. pustulatus suggest that they are visited by either microlepidopterans or small bees, the latter of which are known to pollinate the small, white, short-spurred flowers of three species of Campylocentrum in Brazil (Cabral & Pansarin, 2016; Carlsward et al., 2003; Singer & Cocucci 1999).

Table 1 Species of Dendrophylax with short spurs (equal to or less than the length of ovary). HIS = Hispaniola, PR = Puerto Rico, CUB = Cuba, JAM = Jamaica, CAY = Cayman Islands, MEX = Megamexico, FLA = Florida (USA). 

Dendrophylax species Distribution Inflorescence Spur Inflorescence pubescence Mid lobe of lip
D. constanzensis HIS Filiform to 7 cm long oblong, cylindrical setaceous-hirsute anchor-shaped, apiculate
D. macrocarpa HIS Stout 1-2 cm long obovoid glabrous ovate, acute
D. megarhizus MEX filiform to 10 cm long scrotiform-saccate glabrous ovate-triangular, apiculate
D. monteverdi PR, HIS, CUB, JAM Stout < 1 cm long oblong to obovoid glabrous ovate, truncate
D. porrectus PR, HIS, CUB, JAM, CAY, MEX, FLA Filiform 2-5 cm long scrotiform-saccate glabrous ovate, apiculate
D. pustulatus HIS Filiform 2.2-4.5 cm long oblong, laterally flattened pustulate obovate, retuse
D. serpentilingua HIS filiform 2-3 cm obovoid, laterally flattened hispidus ovate, 2-tailed, apiculate

Conservation status: We know of only one population occupying an area of approximately 2.5 hectares, with about 60 plants, all of which occur within a protected national park, Parque Nacional Armando Bermúdez. These conditions meet the IUCN Red List criterion D for endangered status (EN) (IUCN 2012).

Paratypes: República Dominicana. Cordillera Central: Provincia Santiago, La Diferencia, E. Fernández s.n., 28 Jun 2023 (UPRRP, illustration voucher). Provincia Santiago, La Diferencia, a 1 km en dirección este por el sendero, después de la caseta del Parque Nacional Armando Bermúdez, a lo largo de la vegetación contigua al Río Amina, 19°16’13”N, 71°03’07”W, elev. 735 m, 28 de marzo 2023, E. Fernandez 22B (JBSD).

Key to the species of Dendrophylax

Modified from Ackerman & Collaborators (2014) and Molgo et al. (2016)

1. Inflorescences hispid to hirsute-setaceous throughout..................................................2

2. Apical lobes of the labellum short, retrorse................D. constanzensis (Garay) Nir

2a. Apical lobes of the labellum long, filiform, pendent..D. serpentilingua (Dod) Nir

1a. Inflorescences glabrous to sparsely verrucose or pustulate........................................3

3. Labellum simple or nearly so, retuse, entire or apiculate........................................4

4. Inflorescence less than 1 cm long.......................................................................5

5. Roots smooth; fruits 8-9(-14) mm long; spur 2.5-3.0 mm long; Cuba, Jamaica, Hispaniola, Puerto Rico...D. monteverdi (Rchb.f.) Ackerman & Nir

5a. Roots verrucose; fruits 25-30 mm long; spur 3.0-3.5 mm long, Hispaniola...................................D. macrocarpa (Dod) Carlsward & Whitten

4a. Inflorescences 2-10 cm long............................................................................6

6. Spur scrotiform, saccate..............................................................................7

7. Roots 0.8-1.6 mm in diameter; lip callus 0.2-0.5 long.....................................D. porrectus (Rchb.f.) Carlsward & Whitten 7a. Roots ca. 1.4-2.3 mm in diameter; lip callus 0.07-0.20 mm long........................................................D. megarhizus Molgo & Carnevali

6a. Spur infundibuliform, tubular, or laterally flattened, not scrotiform or saccate................................................................................................................8

8. Spur 1.5-5 mm long, ovary tuberculate or pustulate.............................9

9. Spur 3-5 mm long, infundibuliform...........................D. alcoa Dod 9a. Spur 1.5-2.0 mm long, straight, laterally flattened....................................D. pustulatus Ackerman & E.Fernández

8a. Spur 15-25 mm long, ovary glabrous..............................................10

10. Roots smooth; labellum without a crest; fruits less than 15 mm long; Cuba, Jamaica, and Dominican Republic....................................................D. barrettiae Fawc. & Rendle

10a. Roots tuberculate; labellum with a simple, basal crest 1 mm long; fruits 17-20 mm long; Dominican Republic.................D. elorrhiza Dod

3a. Labellum conspicuously trilobed, deeply emarginate, or apically bilobed.........11

11. Spur less than 10 cm long...............................................................................12

12. Dorsal sepal 17-29 mm long; Jamaica......D. funalis (Sw.) Benth. ex Rolfe 12a. Dorsal sepal less than 7 mm long; Cuba and Hispaniola.......................13

13. Labellum lobes falcate, lanceolate, about 9 × 3 mm, margin entire................................................................D. gracilis (Cogn.) Garay 13a. Labellum obovate, margin minutely denticulate.................................................................D. varius (Gmel.) Urb.

11a. Spur more than 10 cm long...........................................................................14

14. Labellum apical lobes rounded, neither twisted nor elongate; Grand Cayman........................................................................................D. fawcettii Rolfe

14a. Labellum with falcate, twisting apical lobes 4.5-7.0 cm long; Cuba and Hispaniola.............................................................................................................15

15. Lateral lobes of the labellum low triangles, distally spreading 1-3 mm at the isthmus; Cuba..............................................D. lindenii (Lindl.) Benth. ex Rolfe

15a. Lateral lobes of the labellum triangular, fang-like, spreading 8-14 mm at the isthmus; Hispaniola.......................................D. sallei (Rchb.f.) Benth. ex Rolfe

Acknowledgements

We thank Janice Valencia, our editor and two anonymous reviewers for comments on the manuscript, Teodoro Clase and the staff at the Herbario de Jardín Botánico Nacional Rafael M. Moscoso for logistic support, Rosa Margarita Bonetti de Santana for facilitating funding from Fundación Propagas, Silvino Pichardo of La Diferencia Eco-Retreat for hosting us, and Bobbi Angell for her elegant line drawing.

Permits: Collecting was done under the auspices of the Jardín Botánico Nacional Rafael M. Moscoso. CITES permit: DO-02269 issued by the Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, República Dominicana.

Funding. Fundación Propagas of the Dominican Republic and the University of Puerto Rico, Río Piedras, financially supported our field studies.

Author contributions: JDA: field work, taxonomic assessments, writing the first draft and coordinating revisions. EF: field work, logistics, photography, specimen preparation. BC: field work, logistics, specimen preparation. NG: field work and figure preparations. All authors have revised and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or relationships that could be construed to influence this work.

Literature cited

Ackerman, J. D. & Collaborators. (2014). Orchid flora of the Greater Antilles. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden, 109, 1-625. [ Links ]

Ackerman, J. D. , Phillips, R. D., Tremblay, R. L., Reiter, N., Karremans, A., Peter, C. I., Bogarin, D., Perez-Escobar, O.A. & Liu, H. (2023). Beyond the various contrivances by which orchids are pollinated: global patterns in orchid pollination biology. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 202, 295-324. [ Links ]

Cabral, P. R. M. & Pansarin, E.R. (2016). Biologia reproductiva de Campylocentrum micranthum (Orchidaceae, Angraecinae). Rodriguésia, 67, 379-386. [ Links ]

Cano Carmona, E., Veloz Ramírez, A. & Cano-Ortiz, A. (2010). Contribution to the biogeography of the Hispaniola (Dominican Republic, Haiti). Acta Botanica Gallica, 1567, 581-598. [ Links ]

Cano-Ortiz, A., Musarella, C. M., Piñar Fuentes, J. C., Pinto Gomes, C. J. & Cano, E. (2016). Distribution patterns of endemic flora to define hotspots on Hispaniola. Systematics and Biodiversity, doi: 10.1080/14772000.2015.1135195 [ Links ]

Carlsward, B. S., Whitten, W. M. & Williams, N. H. (2003). Phylogenetics of Neotropical leafless Angraecinae (Orchidaceae): reevaluation of generic concepts. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 164, 43-51. [ Links ]

Carlsward, B. S., Whitten, W. M., Williams, N. H. & Bytebier, B. (2006). Molecular phylogenetics of Vandeae (Orchidaceae) and the evolution of leaflessness. American Journal of Botany, 93, 770-786. [ Links ]

Danaher, M. W., Ward, C., Zettler, L. W. & Covell, C. V. (2019). Pollinia removal and suspected pollination of the endangered ghost orchid, Dendrophylax lindenii (Orchidaceae) by various hawk moths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae): another mystery dispelled. Florida Entomologist, 102, 671-683. [ Links ]

Farminhão, J. N. M., Verlynde, S., Kaymak, E., Droissart, V., Simo-Droissart, M., Collobert, G., Martos, F., Stévart, T. (2021). Rapid radiation of angraecoids, (Orchidaceae, Angraecinae) in tropical Africa characterised by multiple karyotypic shifts under major environmental instability. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 159, 107105. [ Links ]

Houlihan, P. R., Stone, M., Clem, S. E., Owen, M. & Emmel, T. C. (2019). Pollination ecology of the ghost orchid (Dendrophylax lindenii): a first description with new hypotheses for Darwin’s orchids. Scientific Reports, 9, 12850 doi: 10.1038/ s41598-019-49387-4 [ Links ]

Hu, H. Y, Stern, R. J., Rojas-Agramonte, Y., Garcia-Casco, A. (2022). Review of geochronologic and geochemical data of the Greater Antilles Volcanic Arc and implications for the evolution of oceanic arcs. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 23, e2021GC010148 [ Links ]

IUCN. (2012). IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 3.1. Second edition. IUCN. [ Links ]

Molgo, I. E., Carnevali Fernández-Concha, G., Whitten, W. M. & Williams, N. H. (2016). Dendrophylax megarhizus (Orchidaceae), a new species from Mexico. Systematic Botany, 41, 263-274. [ Links ]

Pessoa, E. M., Viruel, J., Alves, M., Bogarín, D., Whitten, W. M. & Chase, M. W. (2018). Evolutionary history and systematics of Campylocentrum (Orchidaceae: Vandeae: Angraecinae): a phylogenetic and biogeographical approach. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 186, 158-178. [ Links ]

Powell, R., Ottenwalder, J. A. & Incháustegui, S. J. (1999). The Hispaniolan herpetofauna: diversity, endemism, and historical perspectives, with comments on Navassa Island. In Crother, B. I. (ed.), Caribbean Amphibians and Reptiles, Academic Press. Pp. 93-168. [ Links ]

Santiago-Valentín, E. & Olmstead, R. G. (2004). Historical biogeography of Caribbean plants: introduction to current knowledge and possibilities from a phylogenetic perspective. Taxon, 53, 299-319. [ Links ]

Singer, R. B. & Cocucci, A. A. (1999). Pollination mechanism in southern Brazilian orchids which are exclusively or mainly pollinated by halictid bees. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 217, 101-117. [ Links ]

Tremblay, R. L., Ackerman, J. D. , Zimmerman, J. K. & Calvo, R. N. (2005). Variation in sexual reproduction in orchids and its evolutionary consequences: a spasmodic journey to diversification. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 84, 1-54. [ Links ]

Received: November 15, 2024; Accepted: February 20, 2025

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License