SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.57 issue2An integral approach to environmental restoration in the face of climate change, cultural identity, and archaeological heritage: the case of Tzintzuntzan, Michoacán, México author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista de Ciencias Ambientales

On-line version ISSN 2215-3896Print version ISSN 1409-2158

Abstract

BASURTO-FLORES, Nickole  and  MEDINA-GUERRERO, Nataly. Technical-economic evaluation of the use of biopolymers for the treatment of tannery wastewater. Ciencias Ambientales [online]. 2023, vol.57, n.2, 18199. ISSN 2215-3896.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15359/rca.57-2.2.

(Introduction):

For years, wastewater from tanneries has been discharged into various water sources without any control or with inefficient technologies, generating an impact on water quality. (Objective): To evaluate the technical-economic feasibility of the use of the biopolymer pectin and chitosan for the treatment of tannery wastewater.

(Methods):

Extraction of pectin from cocona and chitosan from shrimp was performed. A jar test was performed where the wastewater and biopolymers were combined, the agitation speed was 120 rpm and the contact time was 1, 2 and 3 h. Analyses of pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), total suspended solids (TSS) and Cr+6 were performed on the samples obtained. For comparison with Maximum Allowable Values (MAV), the samples that showed the highest TSS and Cr+6 removal were used. For the statistical analysis of the different times and concentrations an ANOVA and multiple comparison test was performed, for the comparison of efficiencies between pectin and chitosan a Student's t-test was performed.

(Results):

In the amount of 1 g of both chitosan and pectin there was a removal of Cr+6 of 98.33 % and 98.30 % respectively, both with a time of 1 h. In total suspended solids there was a reduction of 98 % with 1 h of mixing for pectin and 96 % with 3 h of mixing using chitosan. The removal efficiency between chitosan and pectin did not show a significant difference. In the economic part there is a saving of 846.85 USD while for chitosan there would be a saving of 807.61 USD. The concentration of settleable solids and oils and fats parameters were found to be within the MAV. However, for sulfides, BOD and COD were not met.

(Conclusions):

With the use of biopolymers, a considerable decrease in Cr+6 and TSS was achieved, in addition to the fact that both proved to be very efficient. It is also a more economically profitable technology compared to the technology used by the tannery studied. However, in order to meet the requirements of the MAV, some additional technologies must be used.

Keywords : Chitosan; contaminant removal; pectin; tannery.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )