Testate amoebae are found in almost all freshwater habitats. They are present in springs, lakes, reservoirs, waterfalls, rivers, cenotes and even subterranean pools (Medioli & Scott, 1988; Patterson & Kumar, 2002; Escobar, Martínez, & Parra, 2005; van Hengstum, Reinhardt, Beddows, Huang, & Gabriel, 2008). These organisms are a diverse and important component of the benthic community in lakes and wetlands and they play a critical role in food webs (Neville, Christie, McCarthy, & MacKinnon, 2010).
Also referred to as thecamoebians, testate amoebae are single-celled amoeboid protozoa in which the cytoplasm is enclosed within an external shell or discrete test from which pseudopodia emerge (Ogden & Hedley, 1980). These tests range in size from 5 to 300 μm (Smith, Bobrov, & Lara, 2008). Some species have an autogenous test that can be proteinaceous, siliceous or, rarely, calcareous. Other species possess a xenogenous test formed of agglutinated organic or mineral particles captured from the surrounding environment (Ogden & Hedley, 1980; Meisterfeld, 2002a, 2002b). Test morphologies are diverse, which allows identification of these organisms to the species level (Mitchell, Charman, & Warner, 2008).
We studied a database of ~2 800 publications on testate amoebae worldwide (Medioli, Bonnet, Scott, & Medioli, 2003). Results showed that the majority of studies were conducted in temperate, Northern Hemisphere countries. Nevertheless, tropical countries such as Mexico, Brazil, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo and India had a few publications on testate amoebae over the last century. The greatest numbers of studies worldwide were of taxonomic nature, and a few in tropical localities were related to ecology or paleoecology. More than the half of the research accomplished in tropical latitudes was conformed by technical publications or unpublished reports. There is thus a knowledge gap regarding thecamoebians in tropical countries, and further studies are needed in these regions. Additionally, most previous taxonomic research in the Neotropics identified species using only light microscopy (Lahr & Lopes, 2006). The increasing use of testate amoebae as bioindicators and paleoindicators has increased the need for further studies to clarify taxonomy, and elucidate distribution patterns and ecology.
Published studies from Mexico focused on testate amoebae in soils and mosses of diverse terrestrial ecosystems (Golemansky, 1967; Bonnet, 1977; Bobrov & Krasil'nikov, 2011; Bobrov, Krasil'nikov, & García-Calderón, 2013; Gallegos-Neyra, Lugo-Vázquez, Calderón-Vega, Sánchez-Rodríguez, & Mayén-Estrada, 2014). There is also information from protozoological studies focused on lakes (López-Ochoterena & Roure-Cane 1970; Aladro, Reyes, Olvera, & Robles, 2007), cenotes (van Hengstum et al., 2008) and caves (Osorio-Tafall, 1943; Hoffmann, Palacios, & Morales-Malacara, 1986).
The goals of this study were to identify species assemblages of testate amoebae from lakes distributed across central Mexico, in the Northern Neotropics, and produce a catalog of high-quality scanning electron microscope images of those taxa that can be used for future ecological and paleoenvironmental studies.
Materials and methods
Samples were collected from 29 lakes across central Mexico in June and October 2011 and March 2013 (Table 1). The lakes are located within the Neotropical Transmexican Volcanic Belt (Figure 1). Surface sediment samples were collected with an Ekman grab at the deepest site in each lake (Table 1) and at littoral sites, 0.5 to 1 m deep. In the laboratory, sediment samples were preserved in anhydrous ethanol and sub-samples of 2 cm3 wet volume were examined in a Petri dish under a stereomicroscope (Zeiss STEMI 2000-C Schott SeriesEasyLED). Testate amoebae tests in each sediment sub-sample were extracted using a fine brush (Ellison & Ogden, 1987).
Total diameter and aperture diameter were measured on circular tests. Irregularly shaped tests were measured for length and width of the aperture and for the size of the whole test. If a specimen possessed spines, the length of one randomly selected spine was measured. Morphometric data were recorded on at least 30 specimens of each species, with preference given to specimens from the same lake. In some cases, however, there were insufficient tests to measure the required 30 specimens from a single lake, in which case we used individuals from different lakes. In the event that the total number of specimens of a taxon, even from multiple sample lakes, failed to yield enough tests, we simply measured those we had collected.
The best-preserved specimen of each taxon was photographed. Photographs were taken with an Olympus BX50 optical microscope and Olympus DP11 camera, and a Jeol JSM 5 600-LV LCM scanning electron microscope (SEM). Identification was made using available taxonomic keys for testate amoebae, including Ogden and Hedley (1980), Kumar and Dalby (1998), Lee, Leedale and Bradbury(2000), Charman, Hendon and Woodland (2000) and Escobar, Brenner, Whitmore, Kenney and Curtis(2008). Lacustrine arcellacean species can display a large amount of ecophenotypically controlled morphological variability. It is accepted practice that researchers working in lakes assign informal infrasubspecific 'strain' names for ecophenotypes to avoid possible description of unwarranted new species. Although the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature stipulates that infra-subspecfic-level designations have no status (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature [ICZN], 1999), they are useful for distinguishing environmentally significant populations in lacustrine environments (Patterson, Roe, & Swindles, 2012).
Results
Fifty-three surface-sediment samples from 29 lakes were examined for testate amoebae. In total, we identified 41 taxa (24 species and 17 varieties) that belonged to 12 genera (Arcella, Argynnia, Centropyxis, Cucurbitella, Cyclopyxis, Cyphoderia, Difflugia, Euglypha, Lesquereusia, Pentagonia, Pseudodifflugia and Scutiglypha). Of those, 12 species (Arcella conica, Argynnia triangulata, Centropyxis deflandrei, Cucurbitella tricuspis, Difflugia labiosa, D. distenda, D. bidens, D. fragosa, Lesquereusia spiralis, Pentagonia maroccana, Pseudodifflugia fulva and Scutiglypha cabrolae) and 13 varieties (Centropyxis constricta var. spinosa,Difflugia oblonga var. bryophila, D. oblonga var. glans, D. oblonga var. lanceolata, D. oblonga var. linearis, D. oblonga var. oblonga, D. oblonga var. spinosa, D. oblonga var. tenuis, D. protaeiformis var. acuminata, D. protaeiformis var. amphoralis, D. protaeiformis var. claviformis, D. urceolata var. elongata, D. urceolata var. urceolata)had not been recorded previously in Mexico. Scanning electron microscope photographs were taken from the main taxa for better identification (Figure 2, Figure 3 y Figure 4) and some details of the structure of their tests were also recorded using higher magnification (Figure 5). Morphometric data for all taxa are summarized in Table 2.

Figure 2 Micrographs of tests from the study lakes (A) - (B) light microscopy; (C) - (W) scanning electron microscopy. Arcella conica (A) ventral view from lake No. 7; Arcella dentata (B) ventral view from lake No. 28, (C) dorsal view from lake No. 2; Arcella discoides (D) ventral view from lake No. 9, (E) dorsal view from lake No. 1; Arcella gibbosa from lake No. 5 (F) ventral view, (G) dorsal view; Arcella megastoma from lake No. 23 (H) ventral view, (I) dorsal view; Arcella vulgaris (J) ventral view from lake No. 2; Argynnia triangulata (K) lateral view from lake No. 20; Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata (L) ventral view from lake No. 10, (M) ventral view from lake No. 2, (N) dorsal view from lake No. 11; Centropyxis aculeata var. discoides from lake No. 28 (O) ventral view, (P) dorsal view; Centropyxis constricta var. aerophila (Q) ventral view from lake No. 28, (R) dorsal view from lake No. 17; Centropyxis constricta var. constricta from lake No. 29 (S) lateral view; Centropyxis constricta var. spinosa from lake No. 3 (T) ventral view, (U) dorsal view, (V) dorsal view form lake No. 28; Centropyxis deflandrei (W) ventral view, from lake No. 2; Light microscopy, Centropyxis ecornis (X) ventral view from lake No. 10.

Figure 3 Micrographs of tests from the study lakes, scanning electron microscopy. Cucurbitella tricuspis (A) lateral view from lake No. 29, (B) ventral view from lake No. 1; Cyclopyxis kahli from lake No. 20 (C) ventral view, (D) dorsal view; Cyphoderia ampulla (E) lateral view from lake No. 20; Difflugia labiosa (F) lateral view from lake No. 5; Difflugia distenda (G) lateral view from lake No. 29; Difflugia bidens from lake No. 8 (H) lateral view, (I) dorsal view, (J) ventral view; Difflugia corona (K) lateral view from lake No. 5, (L) ventral view from lake No. 17; Difflugia fragosa lateral view (M) from lake No. 5, (N) from lake No. 19; Difflugia gramen (O) lateral view from lake No. 9, (P) lateral view from lake No. 27; Difflugia oblonga var. bryophila from lake No. 20 (Q) lateral view, (R) ventral view; Difflugia oblonga var. lanceolata (S) lateral view from lake No. 5; Difflugia oblonga var. linearis (T) lateral view from lake No. 23; Difflugia oblonga var. oblonga lateral view (U) from lake No. 29, (V) from lake No. 12; Difflugia oblonga var. spinosa (W) - (X) lateral view from lake No. 25.

Figure 4 Micrographs of tests from the study lakes (A) - (G), (I) - (M), (O) - (T) scanning electron microscopy; (H) and (N) light microscopy. Difflugia oblonga var. tenuis lateral view (A) from lake No. 28, (B) from lake No. 10; Difflugia protaeiformis var. acuminata lateral view (C) from lake No. 29, (D) from lake No. 27 (E) from lake No. 1; Difflugia protaeiformis var. amphoralis lateral view (F) from lake No. 29, (G) from lake No. 28; Difflugia protaeiformis var. claviformis (H) lateral view from lake No. 10; Difflugia urceolata var. elongata (I) lateral view from lake No. 7, (J) ventral view from lake No. 18; Difflugia urceolata var. urceolata from lake No. 17 (K) lateral view, (L) ventral view; Euglypha acanthophora (M) lateral view from lake No. 28; Lesquereusia modesta (N) lateral view from lake No. 14; Lesquereusia spiralis (O) lateral view from lake No. 1; Pentagonia maroccana (P) lateral view from lake No. 5; Pseudodifflugia fulva from lake No. 3 (Q) ventral view, (R) - (S) dorsal view; Scutiglypha cabrolae (T) lateral view from lake No. 22.

Figure 5 Micrographs of tests from the study lakes, scanning electron microscopy. Arcella dentata (A) from lake No. 2, detail of plates; Arcella discoides (B) from lake No. 10, detail of the border of the aperture and its pores; Arcella gibbosa (C) from lake No. 5, detail of plates and pores; Arcella megastoma (D) from lake No. 3, border of the test and the aperture; Arcella vulgaris (E) from lake No. 2, detail of plates; Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata, diatoms of the test (F) from lake No. 9, (G) from lake No. 11; Centropyxis aculeata var. discoides (H) from lake No. 28, diatoms of the test; Centropyxis constricta var. aerophila (I) from lake No. 24, material of test; Cucurbitella tricuspis (J) from lake No. 9, particles of test and cement matrix, (K) - (L) from lake No. 10, agglutinated material; Cyphoderia ampulla (M) from lake No. 20, detail of plates; Difflugia corona (N) from lake No. 10, interior structure of test; Difflugia gramen (O) from lake No. 15, detail of the aperture; Difflugia oblonga var. bryophila (P) from lake No. 20, detail of the aperture; Difflugia protaeiformis var. acuminata (Q) from lake No. 27, agglutinated material; Euglypha acanthophora (R) from lake No. 28, detail of the aperture; Lesquereusia spiralis (S) from lake No. 1, detail of plates; Difflugia urceolata var. elongata (T) from lake No. 29, diatoms of the test.
Table 2: Morphologic data for each taxon found in the lakes
| Species/Character | Mean (µm) | SD | CV | Min (µm) | Max (µm) | n |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arcella conica td | 100.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 30.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Arcella dentata td | 144.3 | 36.7 | 0.3 | 68.0 | 176.0 | 6 |
| ad | 32.3 | 7.3 | 0.2 | 24.0 | 42.0 | 6 |
| Arcella discoides td | 131.2 | 45.4 | 0.4 | 50.0 | 250.0 | 31 |
| ad | 59.6 | 26.7 | 0.5 | 18.0 | 114.0 | 31 |
| Arcella gibbosa td | 42.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 12.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Arcella megastoma td | 180.7 | 55.9 | 0.3 | 84.0 | 360.0 | 20 |
| ad | 97.7 | 33.6 | 0.3 | 50.0 | 200.0 | 19 |
| Arcella vulgaris td | 104.8 | 25.2 | 0.2 | 42.0 | 148.0 | 31 |
| ad | 27.7 | 10.7 | 0.4 | 10.0 | 68.0 | 30 |
| Argynnia triangulata tl | 168.8 | 26.5 | 0.2 | 150.0 | 187.0 | 2 |
| tw | 155.0 | 21.2 | 0.1 | 140.0 | 170.0 | 2 |
| ad | 80.8 | 9.6 | 0.1 | 74.0 | 87.5 | 2 |
| Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata tl | 131.7 | 24.8 | 0.2 | 79.0 | 180.0 | 40 |
| tw | 131.3 | 31.4 | 0.2 | 24.0 | 180.0 | 38 |
| al | 45.7 | 11.2 | 0.3 | 22.0 | 80.0 | 40 |
| ab | 47.6 | 11.8 | 0.3 | 21.0 | 75.0 | 38 |
| sl | 24.3 | 7.6 | 0.3 | 8.0 | 46.0 | 38 |
| Centropyxis aculeata var. discoides tl | 123.3 | 20.5 | 0.2 | 90.0 | 187.5 | 31 |
| tw | 119.9 | 21.9 | 0.2 | 90.0 | 184.5 | 31 |
| al | 42.1 | 9.0 | 0.2 | 24.0 | 67.5 | 31 |
| ab | 45.2 | 9.8 | 0.2 | 28.0 | 64.0 | 31 |
| sl | 17.1 | 4.4 | 0.3 | 10.0 | 24.0 | 9 |
| Centropyxis constricta var. aerophila tl | 76.8 | 32.8 | 0.4 | 50.0 | 124.0 | 5 |
| tw | 53.8 | 29.7 | 0.6 | 22.0 | 88.0 | 5 |
| al | 26.6 | 8.2 | 0.3 | 20.0 | 36.0 | 5 |
| ab | 31.0 | 17.6 | 0.6 | 16.0 | 56.0 | 5 |
| Centropyxis constricta var. constricta tl | 76.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 78.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| al | 34.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ab | 40.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| sl | 14.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Centropyxis constricta var. spinosa tl | 83.1 | 14.2 | 0.2 | 44.8 | 120.0 | 30 |
| tw | 77.2 | 12.1 | 0.2 | 42.6 | 106.0 | 30 |
| al | 32.7 | 7.1 | 0.2 | 16.8 | 48.0 | 30 |
| ab | 38.4 | 7.4 | 0.2 | 16.8 | 54.0 | 30 |
| sl | 18.0 | 5.1 | 0.3 | 8.0 | 28.0 | 24 |
| Centropyxis deflandrei tl | 106.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 94.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| al | 48.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ab | 48.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Centropyxis ecornis tl | 168.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 156.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| al | 62.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ab | 60.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Cucurbitella tricuspis tl | 109.9 | 32.7 | 0.3 | 48.8 | 170.0 | 30 |
| tw | 102.5 | 30.5 | 0.3 | 51.0 | 152.0 | 30 |
| ad | 39.6 | 12.9 | 0.3 | 8.0 | 60.0 | 30 |
| Cyclopyxis kahli tw | 87.2 | 28.3 | 0.3 | 50.0 | 130.0 | 6 |
| ad | 27.8 | 17.8 | 0.6 | 12.0 | 62.0 | 6 |
| Cyphoderia ampulla tl | 407.5 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 162.5 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 25.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Difflugia labiosa tl | 93.0 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 90.0 | 96.0 | 2 |
| tw | 62.0 | 11.3 | 0.2 | 54.0 | 70.0 | 2 |
| ad | 26.0 | 5.7 | 0.2 | 22.0 | 30.0 | 2 |
| Difflugia distenda tl | 140.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 120.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 68.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| sl | 30.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Difflugia bidens tl | 110.4 | 18.1 | 0.2 | 64.0 | 162.5 | 29 |
| tw | 106.1 | 15.3 | 0.1 | 50.0 | 137.5 | 29 |
| ad | 51.4 | 11.4 | 0.2 | 26.0 | 75.0 | 29 |
| sl | 15.4 | 4.6 | 0.3 | 8.0 | 24.0 | 28 |
| Difflugia corona tl | 115.3 | 14.2 | 0.1 | 86.0 | 154.0 | 30 |
| tw | 106.7 | 15.4 | 0.1 | 80.0 | 144.0 | 30 |
| ad | 44.7 | 10.3 | 0.2 | 24.0 | 72.0 | 30 |
| sl | 17.9 | 7.7 | 0.4 | 8.0 | 36.0 | 24 |
| Difflugia fragosa tl | 132.0 | 19.8 | 0.2 | 118.0 | 146.0 | 2 |
| tw | 103.0 | 7.1 | 0.1 | 98.0 | 108.0 | 2 |
| ad | 45.0 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 42.0 | 48.0 | 2 |
| Difflugia gramen tl | 75.3 | 16.9 | 0.2 | 50.0 | 120.0 | 30 |
| tw | 57.3 | 13.3 | 0.2 | 40.0 | 80.0 | 30 |
| ad | 23.9 | 7.7 | 0.3 | 12.0 | 40.0 | 30 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. bryophila tl | 271.8 | 40.2 | 0.2 | 112.0 | 315.0 | 30 |
| tw | 153.4 | 26.4 | 0.2 | 72.0 | 180.0 | 30 |
| ad | 81.2 | 18.0 | 0.2 | 34.0 | 110.0 | 30 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. glans tl | 84.0 | 37.4 | 0.5 | 50.0 | 220.0 | 16 |
| tw | 61.1 | 30.1 | 0.5 | 34.0 | 170.0 | 16 |
| ad | 26.6 | 17.6 | 0.7 | 14.0 | 90.0 | 16 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. lanceolata tl | 140.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 62.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 28.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. linearis tl | 134.1 | 22.3 | 0.2 | 100.0 | 174.0 | 28 |
| tw | 53.6 | 10.9 | 0.2 | 38.0 | 80.0 | 28 |
| ad | 27.4 | 5.3 | 0.2 | 16.0 | 34.0 | 28 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. oblonga tl | 144.8 | 36.8 | 0.3 | 92.0 | 240.0 | 16 |
| tw | 85.8 | 29.0 | 0.3 | 56.0 | 180.0 | 16 |
| ad | 44.1 | 23.0 | 0.5 | 12.0 | 118.0 | 16 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. spinosa tl | 186.8 | 74.0 | 0.4 | 96.0 | 296.0 | 5 |
| tw | 106.8 | 31.6 | 0.3 | 64.0 | 146.0 | 5 |
| ad | 38.8 | 9.7 | 0.3 | 28.0 | 50.0 | 5 |
| Difflugia oblonga var. tenuis tl | 226.7 | 89.5 | 0.4 | 126.0 | 370.0 | 15 |
| tw | 117.1 | 52.8 | 0.5 | 58.0 | 195.0 | 15 |
| ad | 48.5 | 24.7 | 0.5 | 22.0 | 90.0 | 15 |
| Difflugia protaeiformis var. acuminata tl | 192.2 | 23.1 | 0.1 | 148.0 | 258.0 | 30 |
| tw | 68.0 | 16.0 | 0.2 | 28.0 | 130.0 | 30 |
| ad | 40.6 | 6.4 | 0.2 | 26.0 | 60.0 | 30 |
| Difflugia protaeiformis var. amphoralis tl | 95.3 | 40.0 | 0.4 | 56.0 | 210.0 | 31 |
| tw | 61.6 | 24.8 | 0.4 | 38.0 | 140.0 | 31 |
| ad | 28.8 | 13.0 | 0.5 | 16.0 | 74.0 | 30 |
| Difflugia protaeiformis var. claviformis tl | 160.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 64.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 36.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Species/Character | Mean (µm) | SD | CV | Min (µm) | Max (µm) | n |
| Difflugia urceolata var. elongata tl | 74.7 | 28.6 | 0.4 | 44.0 | 150.0 | 28 |
| tw | 55.2 | 23.9 | 0.4 | 26.0 | 124.0 | 28 |
| ad | 24.9 | 11.5 | 0.5 | 10.0 | 66.0 | 28 |
| Difflugia urceolata var. urceolata tl | 177.1 | 16.6 | 0.1 | 136.0 | 206.0 | 21 |
| tw | 159.8 | 16.4 | 0.1 | 130.0 | 194.0 | 21 |
| ad | 124.1 | 24.8 | 0.2 | 60.0 | 172.0 | 21 |
| Euglypha acanthophora tl | 110.5 | 50.2 | 0.5 | 75.0 | 146.0 | 2 |
| tw | 67.5 | 37.5 | 0.6 | 41.0 | 94.0 | 2 |
| ad | 25.0 | 12.7 | 0.5 | 16.0 | 34.0 | 2 |
| Lesquereusia modesta tl | 115.3 | 9.9 | 0.1 | 104.0 | 122.0 | 3 |
| tw | 85.3 | 4.2 | 0.1 | 82.0 | 90.0 | 3 |
| ad | 27.3 | 6.4 | 0.2 | 20.0 | 32.0 | 3 |
| Lesquereusia spiralis tl | 150.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 120.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 40.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| sl | 18.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| Pentagonia maroccana tl | 90.0 | 8.7 | 0.1 | 80.0 | 100.0 | 5 |
| tw | 52.0 | 4.7 | 0.1 | 48.0 | 60.0 | 5 |
| ad | 27.6 | 1.7 | 0.1 | 26.0 | 30.0 | 5 |
| Pseudodifflugia fulva tl | 83.8 | 9.5 | 0.1 | 56.0 | 96.0 | 26 |
| tw | 84.8 | 11.6 | 0.1 | 62.0 | 106.0 | 26 |
| al | 31.3 | 7.3 | 0.2 | 16.0 | 40.0 | 18 |
| ab | 39.3 | 5.8 | 0.2 | 26.0 | 48.0 | 18 |
| sl | 18.1 | 5.2 | 0.3 | 12.0 | 32.0 | 17 |
| Scutiglypha cabrolae tl | 82.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| tw | 54.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| ad | 34.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
| sl | 22.0 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
All measurements are in µm. ab = aperture width, ad = aperture diameter, al = aperture length, tl = test length, tw = test width, td = test diameter, sl = spine length. Mean = arithmetic mean, SD = standard deviations; CV = coefficient of variation; Min = minimum; Max = maximum; n = number of tests.
Species characterization and previous occurrences
Arcella conicaDeflandre, 1928
Autogenous brown test. Hexagonal in ventral view with a central, circular aperture. Domed in lateral and dorsal view with depressions forming angular facets bordered by prominent folds and flattened vertices (Figure 2A). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Arcella dentata Ehrenberg, 1830
Autogenous colorless or yellow test. Circular in ventral view, with 9 to 14 spine-like projections that either formed incipiently or were well developed. Aperture: circular and central. Shallow-bowl shaped in lateral view with flattened vertex and 9 to 14 ridges in dorsal view (Figure 2B, Figure 2C, Figure 5A). The species was observed previously in Mexico in a semipermanent freshwater body (Tiscareño, 2008).
Arcella discoidesEhrenberg, 1843
Autogenous test, colorless, yellow, brown, white, red or black. Circular in ventral view with a smooth surface. The aperture is circular, invaginated and bordered by a shallow lip, usually surrounded by a ring of numerous small pores. Plano-convex in lateral view, sometimes arched with a basal border (Figure 2D, Figure 2E, Figure 5B). The species was previously observed in Mexico in lakes, springs and wetlands (López-Ochoterena & Roure-Cane 1970; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Arcella gibbosa Penard, 1890
Autogenous yellow test. Circular in ventral view. Test surface is irregular with numerous small pores between the circular plates. Aperture invaginated, circular and with a distinct lip. Hemispherical in lateral view, with regular depressions on the dorsal surface (Figure 2F, Figure 2G, Figure 5C). The species was observed previously in Mexico in lakes and wetlands (Aladro et al., 2007; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Arcella megastomaPenard, 1902
Autogenous yellow or brown test. Circular in ventral view. Wide aperture with a small lip surrounded by small pores. Flattened in lateral view (Figure 2H, Figure 2I, Figure 5D). The species was observed previously in Mexico in springs, lakes and wetlands (López-Ochoterena & Madrazo-Garibay, 1979; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Arcella vulgaris Ehrenberg, 1830
Autogenous yellow or brown test. Circular in ventral view, with an invaginated, circular aperture bordered by a small lip. Smooth surface test with plates and numerous fine pores between them. Hemispherical in lateral view, often with a basal collar (Figure 2J, Figure 5E). This species has a broad distribution in Mexico and has been observed in springs, lakes, semipermanent freshwater bodies, cave pools, cenotes, drinking water, wastewater, wetlands, rice paddies and soil (Osorio-Tafall, 1943; LópezOchoterena & Roure-Cane, 1970; Rico-Ferrat & López-Ochoterena, 1976; Tomasini-Ortiz & López-Ochoterena, 1979; Serrano-Limón & López-Ochoterena, 1992; Aladro et al., 2007; Tiscareño, 2008; van Hengstum et al., 2008; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Argynnia triangulata Deflandre, 1936
Xenogenic brown test. Trapezoid shape in lateral view, with the fundus larger than the aperture. Aperture terminal and circular. Test surface smooth with regular and flattened mineral aggregates (Figure 2K). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Centropyxis aculeata
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. aculeata
Xenogenous yellow or brown test. Ovoid or circular and depressed in ventral view, with 4-10 posterolateral spines. Aperture subterminal, circular or oval and invaginated. Capshaped in lateral view and tapers toward the aperture. Test surface is smooth only around the aperture and is covered near the spines and on the dorsal surface with mineral grains or diatom frustules (Figure 2L, Figure 2M, Figure 2N, Figure 5F, Fig 5G). This variety was observed previously in Mexican cenotes (van Hengstum et al., 2008).
Centropyxis aculeata
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. discoides
Xenogenous yellow or brown test. Ovoid or circular, depressed in ventral view and without spines. Aperture sub-terminal, circular or oval and invaginated. Main body hemispherical in lateral view with pronounced tapering toward the aperture. Test surface is rough and often covered with mineral grains (Figure 2O, Figure 2P, Figure 5H). This variety was observed previously in Mexican cenotes (van Hengstum et al., 2008).
Centropyxis constricta
Ehrenberg, 1843 var. aerophila
Xenogenous yellow or brown test. Ovoid in ventral view. Aperture sub-terminal, circular or ovoid, invaginated and with a semi-circular rim. Spherical in lateral view and slightly flattened towards the aperture. The test surface is generally rough with mineral grains or diatom frustules and smooth only in a small region around the aperture (Figure 2Q, Figure 2R, Figure 5I). This variety was observed previously in Mexican cenotes (van Hengstum et al., 2008).
Centropyxis constricta
Ehrenberg, 1843 var. constricta
Xenogenous yellow or brown test. Ovoid in ventral view, with 2 or 3 spines on the fundus. The aperture is sub-terminal, ovoid, invaginated and with a semi-circular rim. Spherical in lateral view and slightly flattened towards the aperture. The test surface is rough with mineral grains (Figure 2S). This variety was observed previously in Mexican cenotes (van Hengstum et al., 2008).
Centropyxis constricta
Ehrenberg, 1843 var. spinosa
Xenogenous yellow or brown test. Ovoid in ventral view, with 2-6 spines on the fundus. Aperture sub-terminal, ovoid, invaginated and with a semi-circular rim. Spherical in lateral view and flattened towards the aperture. The test surface is rough with mineral grains or diatom frustules (Figure 2T, Figure 2U, Figure 2V). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Centropyxis deflandrei Rampi, 1950
Xenogenous brown test. Circular in ventral view and laterally depressed. Aperture ovoid to circular and sub-terminal, almost half the size of the test. Without spines. Test surface with mineral grains or diatom frustules (Figure 2W). This is the first record of this species in Mexico. A similar species (Centropyxis cf. deflandrei), however, was reported previously in soils and wetlands (Bobrov et al., 2013).
Centropyxis ecornis Ehrenberg, 1841
Xenogenous circular to square brown test. Circular in ventral view, flattened in lateral view. Large aperture, almost quadrate and sub-terminal, without spines. Test surface with mineral grains (Figure 2X). Species previously observed in Mexico in lakes, waterfalls, wetlands and soil (Laminger, 1973; LópezOchoterena & Madrazo-Garibay, 1979; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Cucurbitella tricuspisCarter, 1856
Xenogenous brown test. Spherical to vaseshaped in lateral view, with a terminal, circular and crenulated aperture. Often with a thin lip surrounded by a 5-11-lobe collar. Test surface with mineral grains or diatom frustules (Figure 3A, Figure 3B, Figure 5J, Figure 5K, Figure 5L). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Cyclopyxis kahli Deflandre, 1929
Xenogenous brown test. Circular in ventral view, with a circular and central aperture. Hemispherical in lateral view. Aperture surface slightly invaginated and smooth. The dorsal surface is rough with mineral grains (Figure 3C, Figure 3D). Species previously observed in Mexico, in lakes, mosses, wetlands and soils (Golemansky, 1967; Bonnet, 1977; Bobrov & Krasil'nikov, 2011; Bobrov et al., 2013). Cyphoderia ampulla Ehrenberg, 1840
Autogenous brown test. Ovoid in lateral view, with round base and tapered near the aperture, forming a short, retort-shaped neck. Aperture terminal and circular. The surface test is composed of oval plates on an organic matrix (Figure 3E, Figure 5M). Species previously observed in a lake in Mexico (Bobrov et al., 2013).
Difflugia labiosa
(Leidy, 1874) Penard, 1902
Xenogenous brown test. Pyriform in lateral view. Fundus tapers slightly to a rounded eccentric apex, with a thin collar surrounding the aperture, which is terminal and circular. Small mineral grains on the surface test (Figure 3F). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Difflugia distenda
Gauthier-Lièvre and Thomas, 1958
Xenogenous test with colorful mineral grains. Almost spherical, with two symmetrical hornlike spines at the fundus. Thin collar with small mineral grains and terminal aperture (Figure 3G). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Difflugia bidensPenard, 1902
Xenogenous brown test. Ovoid and laterally compressed, with 2-5 small spines at the fundus. Aperture terminal, circular and large, without a collar. Some spines can be bifurcated. Test surface with relatively smooth mineral grains (Figure 3H, Figure 3I, Figure 3J). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Difflugia coronaWallich, 1864
Xenogenous brown test. Ovoid to spherical in lateral view, with 1-4 spines at the fundus. Some spines can be bifurcated. Aperture terminal, circular and surrounded by a collar with 8 -12 lobes composed of small particles cemented together. Test surface formed of small mineral grains or fragments of diatom frustules (Figure 3K, Figure 3L, Figure 5N). Species previously observed in Mexico in lakes and in a reservoir (López-Ochoterena & Roure-Cane, 1970; Serrano-Limón & López-Ochoterena, 1992; Silva-Briano et al., 2007).
Difflugia fragosaHempel, 1898
Xenogenous, yellow or brown test. Elongated, with 3-5 large projections running from the middle of the test to the fundus, forming wide spines or tubercles. Aperture terminal and circular, with a thin collar. Test surface formed of small mineral grains (Figure 3M, Figure 3N). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Difflugia gramenPenard, 1902
Xenogenous, yellow or brown test. Test ovoid or spherical in lateral view. Aperture terminal and lobed, in general with 3 lobules and a thin lip made of small particles cemented together. Test surface formed of small mineral grains (Figure 3O, Figure 3P, Figure 5O). Species previously observed in Mexico in lakes, wetlands and wastewater (López-Ochoterena & RoureCane, 1970; Rico-Ferrat & López-Ochoterena, 1976; Serrano-Limón & López-Ochoterena, 1992; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. bryophila
Xenogenous, brown test. Pyriform in lateral view, with a conical fundus. Aperture terminal and circular, formed by mineral grains cemented together, without a collar. Test made of coarse sand grains (Figure 3Q, Figure 3R, Figure 5P). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. glans
Xenogenous, brown test. Ovoid in lateral view, with a rounded fundus. Aperture terminal, large, circular and formed by mineral grains cemented together, without a collar. Test made of coarse sand grains. This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. lanceolata
Xenogenous, brown test. Pyriform in lateral view, with a rounded fundus. Aperture terminal, circular and formed by mineral grains cemented together, without collar. Test made of small mineral grains (Figure 3S). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. linearis
Xenogenous, brown test. Ovoid and elongated in lateral view, with a conical fundus. Aperture terminal and circular, without a collar, formed by mineral grains cemented together. Test made of small mineral grains (Figure 3T). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. oblonga
Xenogenous, brown test. Pyriform and elongated in lateral view, with a large neck and rounded fundus. Aperture terminal, circular and formed by mineral grains cemented together. Test composed of angular sand grains and diatom frustules (Figure 3U, Figure 3V). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. spinosa
Xenogenous, brown test. Pyriform and elongated in lateral view, with a short or long neck and a spine on the fundus. Aperture terminal, circular and formed by mineral grains cemented together. Test composed of angular sand grains and diatom frustules (Figure 3W, Figure 3X). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia oblonga
Ehrenberg, 1832 var. tenuis
Xenogenous, brown test. Pyriform and elongated in lateral view, without a neck and a truncated fundus. Aperture terminal and circular, formed by mineral grains cemented together. Test composed of angular sand grains and diatom frustules (Figure 4A, Figure 4B). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia protaeiformis
Lamarck, 1816 var. acuminata
Xenogenous, hyaline to brown test. Cylindrical in lateral view, with slight tapering near the aperture and a dorsal spine sometimes very large and slightly curved. Aperture terminal and circular, with a smooth outline. Test made of mixed-size mineral grains or diatom frustules (Figure 4C, Figure 4D, Figure 4E, Figure 5Q). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia protaeiformis
Lamarck, 1816 var. amphoralis
Xenogenous, yellow to brown. Elongated test, almost biconical in lateral view, narrowing toward the aperture and with a large projection in the dorsal region that forms one or two wide spines. Aperture terminal and circular, with a smooth outline and a short collar. Test made of coarse grains (Figure 4F, Figure 4G). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia protaeiformis
Lamarck, 1816 var. claviformis
Xenogenous, opaque test. Cylindrical in lateral view, slightly tapering near the aperture and with a wide spine in the dorsal region. Aperture terminal and circular, with a smooth outline. Test made of coarse grains (Figure 4H). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia urceolata
Carter, 1864 var. elongata
Xenogenous, brown and opaque test. Ovoid in lateral view, with a rim sometimes pronounced and curved. Some specimens can have wide spine-like protuberances. Aperture large, terminal and circular, with a relatively smooth outline. Test made of mixed-size grains or diatom frustules (Figure 4I, Figure 4J, Figure 5T). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Difflugia urceolata
Carter, 1864 var. urceolata
Xenogenous, brown and opaque test. Spherical in lateral view, with a pronounced rim that curves back on itself. Occasional wide, spine-like protuberances. Aperture large, terminal and circular with a relatively smooth outline. Test made of mixed-sized grains or diatom frustules (Figure 4K, Figure 4L). This is the first record of this variety in Mexico.
Euglypha acanthophora Ehrenberg, 1814
Autogenous hyaline test. Ovoid in lateral view, with a rounded fundus. Aperture terminal and circular. Test composed of oval to hexagonal plates.Those forming the aperture display a serrated, V-shaped edge, with 5-7 teeth bordering each of these margins. Some dorsal-region plates project dorsally like spines, and can be up to three times the size of the plates themselves (Figure 4M, Figure 5R). Species previously observed in Mexico in lakes and wetlands (Aladro et al., 2007; Bobrov et al., 2013).
Lesquereusia modestaRhumbler, 1895
Autogenous, hyaline to brown. Spherical in lateral view, with an asymmetrical neck, and laterally, slightly narrow. Aperture terminal and circular. Test surface composed of small mineral grains (Figure 4N). Species previously observed in Mexican high-mountain lakes (Laminger, 1973).
Lesquereusia spiralis Ehrenberg, 1840
Autogenous, brown test. Spherical in lateral view, with an asymmetrical neck and laterally, slightly narrow. Spine-like dorsal projection. Aperture terminal and circular. Test surface composed of numerous curved rods (Figure 4O, Figure 5S). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Pentagonia maroccana
Gauthier-Lièvre and Thomas, 1958
Xenogenous brown test. Elongated in lateral view, with four short, wide, spine-like projections on fundus. Short collar and terminal aperture. Surface with small mineral grains (Figure 4P). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Pseudodifflugia fulva Archer, 1870
Xenogenous brown test. Spherical in lateral view, with a very irregular shape because of the large agglutinated particles. Aperture circular, large and smooth in ventral view (Figure 4Q, Figure 4R, Figure 4S). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Scutiglypha cabrolae
Smet and Gibson, 2009
Autogenous test. Plates of different shape depending on the row level. Plates in row around aperture with a triangular edge forming a serrated margin. The opposite end of the plate is semi-circular in shape. Rows of plates increasingly distant from the aperture have decreasingly rounded upper edges, culminating in generally small, but sometimes longer and wider spines in the rows at the fundus (Figure 4T). This is the first record of this species in Mexico.
Taxa distribution in lakes: The greatest number of taxa found in a single lake (No. 4) was 18, and only one lake (No. 6) had no individuals. (Species richness in each lake was tabulated in Appendix I). On average, we recorded eight taxa in each lake. The most-observed taxon was Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata, observed in 22 of the 29 lakes, followed by Arcella discoides, recorded in 17 lakes. In contrast, eight species were recorded in only one lake (Arcella conica, Centropyxis deflandrei, C. ecornis, Cyphoderia ampulla, Difflugia distenda, Lesquereusia spiralis, Pseudodifflugia fulva and Scutiglypha cabrolae). The most similar lakes in terms of species composition were lakes No. 1 and 19, which shared 10 species. Specific richness of testate amoebae in the lakes does not seem to be associated with water depth or lake altitude, so other environmental variables should be explored.
Discussion
There have been few studies on testate amoebae in Mexican lakes. Only recently these protozoa have become the subject of study in Mexico. The focus, however, has been more on soil organisms than on those in aquatic environments. Taxonomic work on testate amoebae in the Neotropics is difficult, owing to the lack of good descriptions or illustrations that could facilitate species recognition. This study provides new biogeographic information and presents the first SEM photographs of almost all species recorded in Mexico.
Recent schemes of classification are based more on the type of pseudopods that testate amoebae possess (Meisterfeld, 2002a, 2002b) or molecular data (Nikolaev et al. 2005). In fact, new molecular studies identified cryptic species and showed the polyphyletic nature of the group (Tekle et al., 2008; Oliverio, Lahr, Nguyen, & Katz, 2014). The characters used for identification in the majority of descriptive and ecologic studies were, however, mainly based on test morphology. Because testate amoebae have few morphologic characters, biometric analysis is a critical aspect of phenotypic description (Bobrov & Mazei, 2004).
Among our specimens, we saw a large size range for the genus Arcella, but the ratio between the test diameter and aperture distinguishes well the different species, without the need for species varieties. Only A. megastoma has great size plasticity. In the case of the genus Centropyxis, all varieties are well defined by the relation between length and width of the test, and the aperture size grows as the test size increases. C. constricta var. aerophila shows large size variation, which may be a consequence of the fact that measured specimens came from different lakes. This is also true for three varieties of Difflugia oblonga (D. oblonga var. tenuis, D. oblonga var. oblonga and D. oblonga var. spinosa) which show great variability and the specimens came from different lakes as well. In contrast, D. oblonga var. bryophila, D. oblonga var. linearis, and both varieties of D. protaeiformis and D. urceolata,display differences in size that, in conjunction with shape differences, support their distinction as different varieties (Appendix II).
Bobrov and Mazei (2004) proposed that polymorphic populations could reflect habitat heterogeneity, thus broad size ranges in our study taxa could be consequence of different collection depths. In samples from shallow lakes, this could also reflect the large number of microhabitats provided by aquatic vegetation.
We compared our morphological data with those from other studies and noticed that Difflugia gramen was smaller in our lakes (Table 2) than in lakes of the study by Lahr and Lopes (2006) (average test length = 108 µm, average test width = 92.3 µm, average aperture diameter = 38 µm), but very similar to the size of specimens reported by Bobrov and Mazei (2004) (average test length = 68.8 µm, average test width = 51.5 µm, average aperture diameter = 23.3 µm). Difflugia corona individuals also show substantial size variability. Our specimens were smaller than those reported by Lahr and Lopes (2006): (average test length = 192.1 µm, average test width = 189.8 µm, average aperture diameter = 91.6 µm; Bobrov & Mazei, 2004: average test length = 166.1 µm, average test width = 159.9 µm, average aperture diameter = 67.9 µm). Again, this size variability may reflect differences among populations. Thus, it may be appropriate to assign a variety name to our specimens if environmental conditions are responsible for determining their morphometry.
Some species found in this study, such as Arcella dentata, A. discoides, A. gibbosa, A. megastoma, Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata, C. aculeata var. discoides, C. constricta var. aerophila, C. constricta var. constricta, Cyphoderia ampulla, Difflugia corona and Lesquereusia modesta, had been recorded previously in Mexico, associated with a variety of freshwater habitats, including springs, lakes, rivers, cenotes, cave pools, drinking troughs and wastewater. Others, such as Arcella vulgaris and Cyclopyxis kahli, were found in mosses and soils as well. Centropyxis aculeata var. aculeata, the taxon found in nearly two-thirds of our sample lakes, was previously reported only in a recent work (van Hengstum et al., 2008). This may be a consequence of the fact that researchers in several previous studies in Mexico identified individuals only to species level, whereas in recent studies, identifications were made to the variety level.
Lakes of the same region displayed different species richness. This could indicate differences in environmental conditions, underscoring the need for detailed studies that include collection of data on physical and chemical variables in the lakes.
In a brief review of testate rhizopod studies in lakes around the world, we noted that the species assemblages we report from Central Mexico resemble most closely assemblages from Neartic water bodies close to Lake Ontario, and near other Canadian lakes (Patterson, MacKinnon, Scott, & Medioli, 1985; Patterson, Barker, & Burbidge, 1996; Reinhardt, Dalby, Kumar, & Patterson, 1998; Kumar & Patterson, 2000; Torigai, Schröder-Adams, & Burbidge, 2000; Roe, Patterson, & Swindles, 2009; Roe & Patterson 2014). In those studies, the composition and abundance of species generally indicated mesotrophic conditions and pollution, suggesting it will be important to gather such information on Mexican lakes to see if testate amoebae can serve as bioindicators of these variables in those water bodies.
The high number of new records provided by this study shows the scarcity of information regarding the diversity of testate amoebae in lakes of Mexico. The morphometric data suggest that new varieties could be described in lakes throughout the center of the country. Only through a comprehensive species characterization will it be possible to carry out ecological and palaeoecological studies in the future.











uBio 



