SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue2Secondary analysis of public metagenomic data identifies periodontal pathogens in the oral but not gut microbiomeAlignment efficiency of two archwires in adolescents with moderate to severe crowding author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences

On-line version ISSN 2215-3411Print version ISSN 1659-1046

Abstract

ROQUE-TRUJILLO, Javier F.  and  MURILLO-GOMEZ, Fabián. Influence of the cavity-depth/light tip-material distance on the degree of conversion and physical properties of a nanohybrid resin composite employing the incremental technique. Odovtos [online]. 2025, vol.27, n.2, pp.84-98. ISSN 2215-3411.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2025.64491.

Evaluate the influence of different cavity depth and consequent light-tip/material distance, on the degree of conversion, biaxial flexural strength and microhardness of a nanohybrid resin- composite (top/bottom), employing the incremental technique. Quadrangular samples (4x4mm) with thickness variations (cavity-depth simulation: 2, 4, and 6 mm; n=10) were made using a nanohybrid resin-composite (Forma, A3, Ultradent) employing the incremental technique. Vickers Microhardness and degree of conversion were assessed on top/bottom surfaces. Biaxial flexural strength was tested on resin-composite discs (8.5mm diameter, 2mm thick) using 3D-printed molds (vertically stacked). Microhardness and Degree of conversion data were analyzed employing 2-way/ANOVA, Biaxial flexural strength with 1-way/ANOVA.For microhardness, “distance” factor plus “surface/distance” interaction resulted statistically significant (p<0.05). The 2 mm group, followed by the 4 mm group, showed the highest Results (99.41±52.23 and 84.1±15.74 VHN), while the 6 mm group had the lowest (68.60±18.69 VHN), with lower values observed on the bottom surfaces for the latter group only. Biaxial flexural strength data showed no significant differences among groups. Degree of conversion was significantly higher at the top surfaces compared to the bottom surfaces (top: 47.74±9.67%; bottom: 21.93±8.57%). At 2 and 4 mm distance, polymerization quality remained adequate (top/bottom surfaces). A 6 mm distance produced lower quality polymerization, mainly on the bottom surfaces. In such scenario, an additional photopolymerization cycle may be desirable. The current outcomes may be related only to the conditions (RBC, distances and LCU) employed in this study.

Keywords : Cavity depth; Nanohybrid composites; Degree of conversion; FTIR; Microhardness; Biaxial flexural strength; Physical properties; Photopolymerization distance.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in English     · English ( pdf )