SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número2Efectos de una combinación de tensioactivo de cloruro de benzalconio e hipoclorito de sodio en la microdureza y el contenido mineral de la dentinaAnálisis cristalográfico y topográfico de la zirconia ultra-translúcida después de diversos tratamientos de superficie índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2215-3411versión impresa ISSN 1659-1046

Resumen

MENDEZ-GONZALEZ, Verónica M. et al. Biocompatibility of bioactive sealers Bio-C sealer vs MTA repair HP in human fibroblasts. Odovtos [online]. 2024, vol.26, n.2, pp.91-100. ISSN 2215-3411.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.58908.

Bioactive cements based on tricalcium silicate have been introducedto the market for use in dentistry, with a variety of clinical applications. These cements are in contact with vital tissues such as dental pulp or periodontium in cases of unintentional extrusion; thus, it is important to know the genotoxicity and cytoxicity of these materials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioactive sealers, Bio-C® Sealer and MTA Repair HP®, in human fibroblasts. Discs of bioactive sealers Bio-C® Sealer, and MTA Repair HP®, were prepared and set for 24h under sterile conditions. The discs were placed in culture medium at 2.5mg/mL inside a SRT6D roller mixer (Stuart, UK) at 60rpm for 24h. The eluates obtained were incubated for 24h with previously activated and cultured ATCC cell line fibroblasts at 80% confluence. The cytotoxicity was evaluated by Alamar Blue® and LIVE/ DEAD assays, as well as the analysis of the Tunel and Mitotracker assays to evaluate genotoxicity using the confocal laser-scanning microscope. In the Alamar Blue® assay, the Bio-C® Sealer presented a cell proliferation of 87%, while the MTA Repair HP® Sealer was 72%. A statistically significant difference was found between the MTA Repair HP® Sealant and the negative control (p=<0.001). Regarding the genotoxicity tests, in the Tunel assay, both materials stain the nucleus of the fibroblast cells exposed to the eluates, while in the Mitotracker assay, the MTA Repair HP® Sealer showed greater mitochondrial function than the Bio-C® Sealer. Calcium silicate-based sealers, Bio-C® Sealer and MTA Repair HP®, are not cytotoxic and have low genotoxicity.

Palabras clave : Bio-C® Sealer; MTA HP® repair; Cytotoxic; Genotoxicity; Cements; Tricalcium silicate.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )