SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue2Accessibility perception of chilean para-athletes, road to santiago 2023Perceived barriers and level of physical activity in colombian university students during the COvID-19 pandemic author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Pensar en Movimiento: Revista de ciencias del ejercicio y la salud

On-line version ISSN 1659-4436Print version ISSN 1409-0724

Abstract

MARQUEZ-BARQUERO, Magally  and  SALAZAR ROJAS, Walter. Basic movement patterns in jumping: an assessment of the process and output. Pensar en Movimiento [online]. 2023, vol.21, n.2, e48328. ISSN 1659-4436.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/pensarmov.v21i2.48328.

This study examines the relationship between output assessment and process assessment for basic movement patterns in jumping and throwing. Forty subjects, all male, 10.03 ± 0.3 years old, 37.82 ± 13.9 kg, 139 ± 28 cm and 19.38 ± 4.5 IMC (kg/m2) participated. The Basic Movement Patterns Instrument (IPBM) was used for assessing the process. For the output, length jump and over-the-shoulder throw tests were made for jumping and throwing, respectively. A descriptive statistics was carried out (averages and standard deviations) for the anthropometric measurements, and for examining the relationship of the outcomes of the two output and process attempts, Spearman correlation at a significance level of p ≤ 0.5 and p ≤ .01 was used. The resulting correlations showed the existence of a positive and significant relationship between process assessment and output assessment of jumping of (r = 0.447; p = .004; r2 = 0.200) in attempt 1 and of (r = 0.562; p < .0001; r2 = 0.316) in attempt 2. Similar results were found between process assessment and output assessment of throwing, (r = 0.332; p = .043; r2 = 0.011) in attempt 1 and (r = 0.311; p = .051, r2 = 0.097) in attempt 2. The correlation indicates that the subjects with the best results in process-oriented assessments have better results in output-oriented assessments; this suggests that the output can be improved by improving the technique. In understanding how process-oriented assessment and output-oriented assessment are mutually related, and in identifying what you want to measure and for what purpose, objectivity can be expected in the methods for assessing the performance of human movement with a process and output approach.

Keywords : physical activity; children; assesment; basic movement patterns.

        · abstract in Spanish | Portuguese     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )