SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.72 número1Composición espacio-temporal de las aves acuáticas en la laguna Juluapan, Colima, en el Pacífico Central MexicanoEl papel de la neofobia en un enriquecimiento olfativo pionero para guacamayos, loros y tucanes índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista de Biología Tropical

versión On-line ISSN 0034-7744versión impresa ISSN 0034-7744

Resumen

AVILA-BERNAL, Carlos-Teodoro; GRIFFITH, Daniel-Michael  y  ESPINOSA-INIGUEZ, Carlos-Iván. Species distribution models and conservation status of threatened bats in the Tumbesian region of Ecuador and Perú. Rev. biol. trop [online]. 2024, vol.72, n.1, e54459. ISSN 0034-7744.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.54459.

Introduction:

Biodiversity is being lost at an accelerating rate because of global change. Tools such as species distribution models (SDMs) have been widely used to improve knowledge about species’ conservation status and help develop management strategies to mitigate biodiversity loss. SDMs are especially important for species with restricted distributions, such as endemic species.

Objective:

To determine how potential distribution predicted by SDMs for eight threatened bat species differed from the distribution maps reported by the IUCN. Also, to infer the area of distribution and state of endemism of each specie, and to evaluate the importance of the Tumbesian region for their conservation.

Methods:

Based on presence records across the species’ entire ranges, we used SDMs to assess the conservation status of these eight species in the Tumbesian region of Ecuador and Peru.

Results:

The areas estimated by SDMs were 35-78 % smaller for four species (Eptesicus innoxius, Lophostoma occidentale, Platalina genovensium and Lonchophylla hesperia) and 26-1 600 % larger for three species (Amorphochilus schnablii, Promops davisoni and Rhogeessa velilla) than those reported by the IUCN. For Tomopeas ravus, the area estimated by the SDM and IUCN was similar but differed in spatial distribution. SDMs coincided with areas of endemism reported by previous authors for E. innoxius, R. velilla, and T. ravus, but were different for A. schnablii, P. genovensium, P. davisoni, and L. hesperia, due in part to projected distributions for these latter species in dry inter-Andean valleys according to the SDMs.

Conclusions:

The Tumbesian region represents a significant portion (40-96 %) of the predicted distribution of seven of the eight species studied, underscoring the importance of this region for bat conservation. Our results show likely distributions for these species and provide an important basis for identifying research gaps and developing conservation measures for threatened bats in the Tumbes biodiversity hotspot.

Palabras clave : endemism; extent of occurrence; MaxEnt; seasonally dry tropical forests; threatened species..

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )