<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2215-2644</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista Educación]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Educación]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2215-2644</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Costa Rica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2215-26442023000100119</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15517/revedu.v47i1.51978</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Congruencia entre la práctica docente y la evaluación de la docencia por parte del estudiantado en educación superior: estudio de casos en la Universidad Veracruzana]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Consistency between teaching practice and the evaluation of teaching by students in higher education: Case studies in the Universidad Veracruzana]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Silva Blanco]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Lily Ariadna]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Veracruzana  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>México</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>47</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>119</fpage>
<lpage>134</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2215-26442023000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2215-26442023000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2215-26442023000100119&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Existe una fuerte relación entre la calidad educativa y la calidad de la docencia que se ofrece en las universidades, por ello se concede especial importancia a la evaluación del desempeño docente. En este sentido, el presente trabajo tiene como objetivo determinar si existe congruencia entre la práctica docente, la percepción de la población estudiantil y la calificación asignada en la evaluación de la docencia por parte del estudiantado. Se utilizó el enfoque cualitativo, complementado con el cuantitativo, la investigación descriptiva y el estudio de casos. La muestra consistió en 10 docentes y 10 estudiantes pertenecientes a las áreas académicas que comprende la Universidad Veracruzana (UV). Se recabó información a partir de observaciones en el aula y entrevistas abiertas; la información fue analizada a través de una matriz de congruencia. Se encontró que no existe congruencia entre la calificación que obtiene el personal docente en la evaluación del desempeño con su práctica en el aula, tomando como referencia las actividades que valora el instrumento de evaluación del Programa de Estímulos al Desempeño del Personal Académico (PEDPA) de la UV. La falta de congruencia radica en la percepción del estudiantado y en la valoración de elementos que no considera el instrumento de evaluación, ya que el cuerpo docente lleva a la práctica mayores conocimientos, habilidades y actitudes que las que evalúa, donde destacan atributos afectivos, relaciones interpersonales y características personales. Estos hallazgos muestran la necesidad de crear un sistema de evaluación docente que incluya diversas técnicas, como la autoevaluación, retroalimentación, observaciones, evaluación por pares, entre otras que permitan obtener una evaluación más efectiva del desempeño docente.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract There is a solid relationship between educational quality and the quality of teaching offered at universities; therefore, special importance is given to the evaluation of teaching performance. Thus, the objective of this paper is to determine if there exists a congruence between the teaching practice, the perception of the student population, and the grade assigned in the evaluation of teaching by the students. Regarding the approach, the investigator used the qualitative one complemented, in turn, by the quantitative one, as well as descriptive research and case study. For its part, the sample consisted of 10 teachers and 10 students from the academic areas included in the Universidad Veracruzana (UV). Likewise, the researcher collected information from classroom observations and open interviews to later analyze it through a congruence matrix. This is how it was found the lack of consistency between the qualification that the teaching staff obtains in the performance evaluation and their practice in the classroom, taking as a reference the activities that the evaluation instrument of the Programa de Estímulos al Desempeño del Personal Académico (PEDPA) of the UV values. The absence of consistency lies in the perception of the students and in the assessment elements that the evaluation instrument does not consider, for the teaching staff puts into practice greater knowledge, skills, and attitudes than those evaluated, where affective attributes, interpersonal relationships, and personal characteristics stand out. Therefore, these findings show the need to create a teacher evaluation system that includes various techniques such as self-assessment, feedback, observations, peer evaluation, among others, that allow for a more effective evaluation of teacher performance.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación docente]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Práctica pedagógica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Enseñanza superior]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Teacher Evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pedagogical Practice]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Higher Education]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Almutairi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Shraid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Teacher evaluation by different internal evaluators: Head of departments, teachers themselves, peers and students]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>588-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arnold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Versluis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The influence of cultural values and nationality on student evaluation of teaching]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Educational Research]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<page-range>13-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aristulle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paoloni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Habilidades socioemocionales en las comunidades educativas: aportes para la formación integral de los y las adolescentes.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Educación]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>18-32</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ary]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Asghar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Introducción a la investigación pedagógica]]></source>
<year>1989</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[McGraw-Hill]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beltrán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Serrano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Enríquez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La evaluación de la docencia en las universidades públicas mexicanas: un diagnóstico para su comprensión y mejora.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>77-92</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berezvai]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lukáts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Molontay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Can professors buy better evaluation with lenient grading? The effect of grade inflation on student evaluation of teaching]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>46</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>793-808</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Best]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Como investigar en Educación]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Morata S. A]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Boring]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ottoboni]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stark]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ScienceOpen Research]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>0</volume>
<numero>0</numero>
<issue>0</issue>
<page-range>1-11</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Calatayud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[aluación docente y mejora profesional. Descubrir el encanto de su complicidad.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>87-100</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clayson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student evaluation of teaching and matters of reliability]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>666-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Galván]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Farías]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Características personales y práctica docente de profesores universitarios y su relación con la evaluación del desempeño.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>9-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aláez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romero]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Aplicación y resultados de un sistema para evaluar la calidad de la docencia universitaria en una década de experimentación.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Investigación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>51-68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hickman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alarcón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cepeda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cabrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Torres]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Significado de buen profesor y de evaluación docente por estudiantes y maestros universitarios. La técnica de redes semánticas.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Sinéctica]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<numero>47</numero>
<issue>47</issue>
<page-range>1-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rueda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Contribuciones de la Red Iberoamericana de Investigadores sobre la Evaluación de la Docencia (RIIED)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación, desarrollo, innovación y futuro de la docencia universitaria]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>18-47</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[FEDUN]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Luna-Serrano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vallle-Espinosa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Osuna-Lever]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Los rasgos de un "buen profesional", según la opinión de estudiantes universitarios en México.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>12</volume>
<numero>SPE</numero>
<issue>SPE</issue>
<page-range>1-14</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Marsh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Students&#8217; evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<page-range>319-83</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Matosas-López]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leguey-Galán]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doncel-Pedrera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Converting Likert scales into Behavioral Anchored Rating Scales (Bars) for the evaluation of teaching effectiveness for formative purposes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of University Teaching y Learning Practice]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1-24</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[La Didáctica ante el Tercer Milenio]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Colección Letras Universitarias. Síntesis.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Maxwell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Diseño de investigación cualitativa. Un enfoque interactivo]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Gedisa]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pedraza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La matriz de congruencia: Una herramienta para realizar investigaciones sociales.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Economía y Sociedad]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>311-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Be Ramírez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluar la práctica docente a partir de los comentarios de estudiantes universitarios.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Educación]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>76</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>117-34</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Futuro de la evaluación y desarrollo docente: tres perspectivas para el debate]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación, desarrollo, innovación y futuro de la docencia universitaria]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>72-82</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[FEDUN]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rueda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Notas para una agenda de discusión sobre la evaluación de la docencia en las universidades.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[¿Hacia una nueva cultura de la evaluación de los académicos?]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>203-15</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[CESU]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rueda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La ANUIES y la evaluación de la docencia.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[La ANUIES y la construcción de políticas de educación superior 1950-2015]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<page-range>373-86</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[ANUIES]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seivane]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brenlla]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluación de la Calidad Docente Universitaria desde la Perspectiva del estudiantado.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>35-46</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stake]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Visse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La ética en los sistemas de evaluación estudiantil de la enseñanza]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Evaluación, desarrollo, innovación y futuro de la docencia universitaria]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<page-range>83-94</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[FEDUN]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stroebe]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student Evaluations of Teaching Encourages Poor Teaching and Contributes to Grade Inflation: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Basic and Applied Social Psychology]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>276-94</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tran]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Do]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[X.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Student evaluation of teaching: do teacher age, seniority, gender, and qualification matter?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Educational Studies]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>98</volume>
<page-range>1-28</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uttl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzalez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Meta-analysis of faculty&#8217;s teaching effectiveness: Student evaluation of teaching ratings and student learning are not related.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Studies in Educational Evaluation]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>54</volume>
<page-range>22-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Universidad Veracruzana</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Reglamento del Programa de Estímulos del Desempeño del Personal Académico]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Villa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espinoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sandoval]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La evaluación del desempeño docente desde la perspectiva del docente y de los administradores del proceso.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Investigación Académica sin Frontera]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>35</numero>
<issue>35</issue>
<page-range>1-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhao]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A literature review of the research on students&#8217; evaluation of teaching in higher education]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Frontiers in Psychology]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<page-range>1-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
