*Dirección para correspondencia

---

Abstract

Although sugar-water feeders are commonly used by enthusiasts to attract  hummingbirds, little is known about how they affect hummingbird behavior and flower use. We studied the highland hummingbird assemblage of Cerro de La Muerte, Costa Rica, both at a site with permanent feeders (La Georgina Restaurant) and further from it. We examined how feeder use and ]]> individuals of four hummingbird species captured around the feeders using mist nets, which were compared with a pollen reference collection of plants with a pollination syndrome by hummingbirds. The same methods were implemented ]]> Panterpe insignis), dominated the feeders during the dry season. Meanwhile, in the wet season, feeder usage was more evenly distributed across species, with the exception of the Volcano Hummingbird, Selasphorus flammula, ]]> Centropogon). Overall pollen loads increased during the dry season coinciding with peaks in flower availability, although the majority of captured hummingbirds carried no pollen. Mist nets located 3km from La Georgina returned few captures (one-to-three specimens) per sampling date, ]]>

Key words: Panterpe insignis, Eugenes fulgens, Selasphorus flammula, Colibri thalassinus, Cerro de la Muerte, artificial feeders, pollen loads, foraging ecology.

Resumen
]]>
El uso de comederos constituye una práctica común para atraer colibríes, a pesar de que sabemos poco acerca de sus efectos sobre las relaciones ecológicas entre colibríes y sus plantas asociadas. Estudiamos el grupo de colibríes del Cerro de La Muerte, Costa Rica, en un sitio con comederos permanentes (Restaurante La Georgina), así como en un lugar alejado de los comederos. Analizamos cómo el uso y monipolización estacional de los comederos ]]> Panterpe insignis, dominó los comederos. En la estación lluviosa el uso de comederos fue más equitativo. La carga de polen fue muy baja en abundancia (50% de los colibríes tenían poco o cero ]]> Centropogon). Encontramos una relación competitiva y antagonística entre la visitación de comederos y la abundancia de flores. La carga de polen aumentó en la estación seca al haber más flores, aunque la mayoría de los colibríes capturados no tenían polen. Durante la estación lluviosa, cuando hay menos flores disponibles, el uso de comederos aumenta y la carga de polen disminuye. El uso de comederos interfiere en redes de ]]>

Palabras clave: Panterpe insignis, ]]> Cerro de la Muerte, comederos artificiales, carga de polen, ecología de forrajeo.

---

High elevation imposes major physiological challenges on hummingbirds, a group already characterized by having one of the highest metabolic rates found in vertebrates, ]]> & Dudley 2002). The 52 species of hummingbirds found in Costa Rica are mostly abundant in lowland and premontane tropical forests, and their diversity decreases with increasing elevation. This is consistent with the Amazonian origin of the family Trochilidae, and the inferred pattern of subsequent colonization of new habitats, including highlands, as the family diversified (Bleiweiss ]]> et al. 1977), and species that inhabit high elevations also exhibit changes in morphology that reduce energy consumption during hovering flight (Alshuler & Dudley 2002). Floral nectar, which provides a concentrated source of energy, is another factor in allowing the ]]> et al. 1992, Stiles 1995), insects do not substitute for floral nectar (Brice 1992), and nectar availability drives the annual cycles of most hummingbird species (Stiles 1980), especially in the highlands (Hainsworth & Wolf 1972).

]]> An increasing number of restaurants, hotels and recreational areas, as well as numerous hummingbird enthusiasts, maintain sugarwater hummingbird feeders on a permanent basis. The underlying reasons for establishing feeders range from purely economical (a tourist attraction) to the general belief that the practice benefits the hummingbirds. Feeders satisfy the thrill of attracting birds that are often difficult to observe in high numbers under natural conditions. Notwithstanding this practice is widespread, and feeders are regularly used in ecological (Powers 1987) and ]]> & Johnsen 1990, Sandlin 2000), including banding studies (Inouye et al. 1991), little is known of the consequences of the continuous use of commercial feeders for the biology of hummingbirds or for the reproductive success of their associated plants (Arizmendi et al. 2007, McCaffrey & Wethington 2008). Pollinator diversion by feeder usage is more likely to affect pollination systems in the highlands, where harsh environmental ]]>

The objective of this study was to assess how the use of artificial sugar-water feeders influences the quantity and composition of pollen loads of the hummingbirds in the highlands of Cerro de La Muerte, Costa Rica. Since 2001, the restaurant La Georgina in Cerro de La Muerte has maintained ]]>

Materials and methods
]]>
Study site: The study was carried out at La Georgina Restaurant and Lodge in Cerro de la Muerte, Cartago, Costa Rica (3 086masl, 09º33’28’’ N - 83º43’25’’ W) in the Talamanca Mountain Range. This region is dominated by oak forests and páramo ecosystems. Temperatures range from 25°C-0°C (Wolf et al. 1976), but may approach -5oC before dawn and 28oC at midday during the dry season. The dry season lasts from November-April, ]]>

We sampled four periods over two years: July 30-31, 2003 (wet season 2003); November 11-12, 2004 (early dry season 2004); February 11-12, 2005 (peak dry season 2005); and September 20-21, 2005 (peak wet season 2005). Four species of hummingbirds are regular residents: the Volcano (Selasphorus flammula), ]]> Panterpe insignis), Magnificent (Eugenes fulgens) and Green Violet-eared (Colibri thalassinus) hummingbirds. All these species are able to move across elevations following changes in nectar resources (Stiles & Skutch 1989). The ecological relationships and hierarchy of dominance are described by Wolf et al. (1976) and Colwell ]]> P. insignis is the alpha species, followed by C. thalassinus, E. fulgens and S. flammula.

Quantification of feeder visitation: For each sample we visited La Georgina for two days. Data ]]>
]]>
For 1min, every 4min, we recorded the species and number of individuals per species that drank from every feeder simultaneously. A “visit” took place when the hummingbird drank directly from the feeder. Multiple dips into the feeder were counted as individual visits. This procedure measured only the actual use of the feeders by the hummingbirds. It did not take into account interference ]]>

Pollen loads: We captured hummingbirds with three to four mist nets of 10m x 2.5m set up close to the hummingbird feeders at La Georgina, as well as 3km away from the Restaurant in the edge between a ]]>

Pollen reference collection: Pollen ]]> et al. 1976), to establish a pollen reference collection. We opened ripe anthers onto a microscope slide and sealed each sample with a piece of transparent Scotch™ tape. Pollen was identified under a light microscope, and drawings and digital photos of pollen grains were made to identify to genus (and species when possible) the pollen grains carried by hummingbirds.

]]> Statistical analyses: We used a chi-square test to look for variation among hummingbird species and seasons in the frequency of feeder visitation. To determine differences in the frequency of occurrences of categories of pollen loads among species and seasons we used a nominal logistic regression of the form Log(P) _ij=bo+b₁X_i+b₂X_j+e_ij, where P is the probability of occurrence of a given pollen load category for a given season x species combination, X_i is the effect of the species, and X_j is the ]]> ij is the error term. Due to the low frequency of S. flammula visits, we excluded that species from the analysis. The number of hummingbirds captured away from La Georgina was small (one to three individuals per sampling period), preventing the inclusion of these data in further statistical analyses. All analyses were carried out using JMP 7.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, USA).
]]>
Results

Feeder visitation: Throughout the early dry season of 2004 and the peak dry season of 2005 P. insignis was by far the most dominant hummingbird at the feeders, while S. flammula made the least use of the feeders across all seasons. E. fulgens, P. insignis and C. thalassinus made a similar use of feeders during the peak 2005 wet season (Table 1). Feeder usage was clearly dependent on season and hummingbird species (x²=463.92, p<0.001, df=6). In addition, S. flammula made a greater percentage of the total ]]> Table 1). The feeders attracted a large number of hummingbirds, and although we did not count how many hummingbirds of each species were using the feeders, we feel that the patterns of feeder monopolization closely resembled the abundance of each hummingbird species around the feeders, as well as of those captured in the mist nets. Most hummingbirds quit 15min before sunset, with only a few P. insignis remaining at the feeders for at least 15 more minutes ]]>

Pollen loads: Of the 183 hummingbirds captured in the mist nets over the course of the study 12 were recaptures, and were excluded from further analyses. No individual captured at La Georgina was recaptured at our site 3km away from the feeders.

More than 50% of the ]]> Fig. 1, Table 2). If the “zero” and “low” categories are combined (or if only the “high” category is considered), the percentage carrying little pollen increases to 70% of the captured birds. Furthermore, only four E. fulgens carried mites on their beaks (the presence of mites is evidence ]]>

Logistic regression showed a significant effect of season (Wald test=18.38, p=0.005, df=6), but not of species (Wald test=3.41, p=0.49, df=4), indicating that patterns of pollen loads were similar for the three species considered in the analysis (P. insignis, C. thalassinus and E. fulgens). The effect of ]]> C. thalassinus from the analysis (Wald test=16.69, p=0.01, df=6) since this species was not captured either in the 2003 wet season or in the 2004 early dry season (Table 2). The percentage of hummingbirds with high pollen loads was greatest during the peak dry season of 2005, although most hummingbirds still carried zero pollen. The lowest pollen loads were observed during the peak wet season of 2005. For this period, there was a reduction in the number of individuals per species with the exception ]]> E. fulgens (Table 1). Of the four species, P. insignis and E. fulgens had the highest proportion of individuals with zero pollen across sampling dates. Consistent with our expectation, in the early 2004 dry season E. fulgens decreased its utilization of feeders, and the number of individuals with high pollen loads increased (Table 2). In the peak ]]> P. insignis and E. fulgens had relatively equal proportions of birds with zero pollen. Similar patterns were found for C. thalassinus and S. flammula, although these two species were not well represented in the mist net data.

]]> Plant species represented in pollen loads: Species of Centropogon (C. talamancensis and C. valerii) dominated 61% of the pollen loads taken at La Georgina across sampling periods; pollen of other plant species was uncommon (Table 3). 96% of hummingbirds that carried pollen carried only one species. Mist nets located away from the Restaurant returned a low number of hummingbirds captured per sampling date (one-to-three specimens, with high pollen ]]> Centropogon). Although we increased the distance from the Restaurant area, and set up the mist nets in habitats where hummingbirds were observed to be formerly abundant (forest edges, abandoned pastures with abundance of hummingbird pollinated plants), the return in numbers of captured hummingbirds was low during the sampling period (total n=10).

Discussion

According to this study, sugar-water feeders appear to have the ability to attract hummingbirds across considerable distances, drawing them away from flowers, at least in some seasons. We captured few hummingbirds at a site 3km from the La Georgina feeders, and sampling of other habitats away from the Restaurant failed to alter this pattern. No hummingbird captured at La ]]> Centropogon. These results contrast with those from a one-year monitoring study (G. Avalos, unpublished) done in the same area in 1991, well before the feeders at La Georgina were established. That study recorded that two-to-three species of pollen were carried per hummingbird species, and a higher pollen load across all species. Furthermore, a sampling effort comparable to what we used here at sites ]]> et al. 1976). There have been no other major changes in the landscape, or in plant distribution since feeders were established. These same locations were used in the past in the vicinity of the Restaurant before the establishment of the feeders, and returned a larger number of captures. Nowadays, hummingbirds are rarely observed or captured in areas away from the Restaurant. It is likely that the distance between ]]>

The seasonality of flowering phenology determined the competitive and antagonistic pattern between feeders and flowers found at Cerro de La Muerte. Here, Centropogon shrubs (both C. valerii and C. talamancensis) produce flowers continuously during the year, but it is in the dry season when this genus reaches a peak in flower production, along with more than 20 hummingbird-pollinated plants abundant at the site (Colwell 1973, Wolf et al. 1976). This explains the dry season ]]> et al. (1991) observed a similar competitive and antagonistic pattern between feeders and flowers in the Broad-tailed Hummingbird (Selasphorous platycercus) in the Rocky Mountains of Colorado: in years of high flower abundance hummingbirds decreased the use of feeders, but in years of low flower abundance feeders drew hummingbirds away from flowers. Similar results were found by McCaffrey & Wethington (2008) in a ]]>

The competitive and antagonistic pattern shown here between feeders and flowers indicate that pollination networks could be significantly altered. Feeders present a superabundant, predictable resource, whose availability does not decrease throughout the day or seasons, as is the case with hummingbird pollinated plants (Hainsworth & ]]> et al. 1976, Garrison & Gass 1999). The long-term use of feeders may alter migration routes, the spatial dispersion of hummingbird assemblages, and behavioral interactions among hummingbird species. In at least one study it has been established that feeders decrease plant reproductive success (Arizmendi et al. 2007).
 
]]> Our results need to be compared with more diverse hummingbird assemblages over longer periods. The harsh environmental conditions of the highlands (i.e., cold nights and hot and dry conditions during the day in the dry season, and cold nights and rainy days in the wet season) increases the importance of feeders for highland hummingbirds. In the lowlands and mid-elevations a more diverse plant assemblage and more favorable environmental conditions could favor a wider dispersal of hummingbirds over larger ]]> Heliodoxa jacula, similar in size and overall morphology to P. insignis), tend to monopolize feeders more often than non-territorial hummingbirds, and that feeders are sparingly visited by trapliners (Green Hermit, Phaetornis ]]> ). Thus, trochilinidae territorial hummingbirds are more likely to develop a strong dependence on feeders. Borgella et al. (2001) analyzed a more diverse hummingbird-plant assemblage, and found relatively high and diverse pollen loads for the Long-tailed Hummingbird (Phaetornis superciliosus), but just  one pollen type for the White-tipped Sicklebill (Eutoxeres aquila). ]]>

The actual effects of artificial feeders on pollination systems have been neglected in the literature. By supplementing birds with food we are prone to interfere with pollination networks  already stressed by anthropogenic effects, such as global warming, habitat fragmentation, land use changes, and intense agricultural practices involving the use of pesticides and ]]> et al. 1998). Healthy pollination systems perform a critical environmental service to humankind, but are rarely quantified, and much less, officially acknowledged. However, without knowledge on the basic aspects of plant-pollinator interactions and how these are affected by humans, it will be difficult to implement optimal management decisions for conservation (Ghazoul 2005).

Acknowledgments

We thank the students and staff of The School for Field Studies and volunteers from the University of Costa Rica (Luis Sandoval, María Gabriela Gei, Sabrina Amador, Esteban Bermúdez, Katya Barrantes and Minor Barboza) for their help with fieldwork. We thank the staff and owners of La Georgina for their hospitality and for the opportunity to work there. Jorge ]]>

---

References

Altshuler, D.L. & R. Dudley. 2002. The ecological and evolutionary interface of hummingbird flight physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 205: 2325-2336.         [ Links ]

Arizmendi, M.C., C. Monterrubio-Solís, L. Juárez, I. Flores-Moreno & E. López-Saut. 2007. Effect of the presence of nectar feeders on the breeding sucess of Salvia mexicana and Salvia fulgens in a suburban park near Mexico City. Biol. Conserv. 136: 155-158.         [ Links ]

Bleiweiss, R. 1998. Origin of hummingbird faunas. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 65: 77-97.         [ Links ]

Borgella, R., A.A. Snow & T.A. Gavin. 2001. Species richness and pollen loads of hummingbirds using forest fragments in southern Costa Rica. Biotropica 33: 90-109.         [ Links ]

Brice, A.T. 1992. The essentiality of nectar and arthropods in the diet of the Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna). Comp. Biochem. Phys. A 101: 151-155.         [ Links ]

Colwell, R.K. 1973. Competition and coexistence in a simple tropical community. Am. Nat. 107: 737-760.         [ Links ]

Garrison, J.S.E. & C.L. Gass. 1999. Response of a traplining hummingbird to changes in nectar availability. Behav. Ecol. 10: 714-725.         [ Links ]

Ghazoul, J. 2005. Buzziness as usual? Questioning the global pollination crisis. TREE 20: 367-373.         [ Links ]

Hainsworth, F.R. & L.L. Wolf. 1972. Energetics of nectar extraction in a small, high altitude, tropical hummingbird, Selasphorus flammula. J. Comp. Physiol. 80: 377-387.         [ Links ]

Hainsworth, F.R., B.G. Collins & L.L. Wolf. 1977. The function of torpor in hummingbirds. Physiol. Zool. 50: 215-222.         [ Links ]

Inouye, D.W., W.A. Calder & N.M. Waser. 1991. The effect of floral abundance on feeder censuses of hummingbird populations. Condor 93: 279-285.         [ Links ]

Kearns, C.A., D.W. Inouye & N.M. Waser. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: The conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 83-112.         [ Links ]

McCaffrey, R.E. & S.M. Wethington. 2008. How the presence of feeders affects the use of local floral resources by hummingbirds: A case study from southern Arizona. Condor 110: 786-791.         [ Links ]

Poulin, B., G. Lefebvre & R. McNeil. 1992. Tropical avian phenology in relation to abundance and exploitation of food resources. Ecology 73: 2295-2309.         [ Links ]

Powers, D.R. 1987. Effects of variation in food quality on the breeding territoriality of the male Anna’s Hummingbird. Condor 89: 103-111.         [ Links ]

Sandlin, E.A. 2000. Cue use affects resource subdivision among three coexisting hummingbird species. Behav. Ecol. 11: 550-559.         [ Links ]

Stiles, F.G. 1980. The annual cycle in a tropical wet forest hummingbird community. Ibis 122: 322-343.         [ Links ]

Stiles, F.G. 1995. Behavioral, ecological and morphological correlates of foraging by arthropods by the hummingbirds of a tropical wet forest. Condor 97: 853-878.         [ Links ]

Stiles, F.G. & A.F. Skutch. 1989. A guide to the birds of Costa Rica. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.         [ Links ]

Stromberg, M.R. & P.B. Johnsen. 1990. Hummingbird sweetness preferences: Taste or viscosity? Condor 92: 606-612.         [ Links ]

Wolf, L.L., F.G. Stiles & F.R. Hainsworth. 1976. Ecological organization of a tropical high-land hummingbird community. J. Anim. Ecol. 32: 349-379.         [ Links ]

*Correspondencia a: Gerardo Avalos; Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica. The School for Field Studies, Center for Sustainable Development Studies, 10 Federal St., Salem, MA 01970 USA; avalos@fieldstudies.org

Alejandra Soto; Elon University, Ecology and Environmental Science, Apdo. 1524-2050 San Pedro, Costa Rica; alekasoto@gmail.com

Willy Alfaro; Apdo. 463, San Ramón, 20203, Costa Rica; willyalfaro@amnet.co.cr

1. Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica.
2. The School for Field Studies, Center for Sustainable Development Studies, 10 Federal St., Salem, MA 01970 USA; avalos@fieldstudies.org
3. Elon University, Ecology and Environmental Science, Apdo. 1524-2050 San Pedro, Costa Rica; alekasoto@gmail.com
4. Apdo. 463, San Ramón, 20203, Costa Rica; willyalfaro@amnet.co.cr

---