<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2215-3411</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Odovtos]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2215-3411</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Costa Rica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2215-34112023000300055</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15517/ijds.2023.54635</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Evaluation the scanning accuracy of blue-light laboratory scanners in complete edentulous maxilla with multiple implants with titanium scan bodies]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación de la precisión de escaneado de los escáneres de laboratorio de luz azul en maxilares desdentados completos con implantes múltiples con cuerpos de escaneado de titanio]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ezmek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Bahad&#305;r]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cumhur Sipahi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Osman]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Turkey</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Health Sciences University Gulhane Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Turkey</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>55</fpage>
<lpage>66</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2215-34112023000300055&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2215-34112023000300055&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2215-34112023000300055&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract To evaluate the accuracy of complete arch scanning with multiple implant titanium scan bodies using laboratory scanners. A master model of an edentulous maxillary arch with 6 implants was fabricated. Titanium scan bodies were inserted into the model. Three laboratory scanners were used: D2000 (3Shape), Vinyl High Resolution (Smart Optics), and inEos X5 (Dentsply Sirona). The master model was consecutively scanned ten times using dental laboratory scanners (LS) without detaching and repositioning the scan bodies. Linear and angular accuracy between adjacent implants was measured using inspection software (Control X, Geomagic). The accuracy of the complete arch scans was calculated. Implant regions were defined as; parallel (R1: #24-26 and #16-14), angled (R2: #22-24 and #14-12), angled to occlusal plane (R3: #12-22), and cross-arch (R4: #16-26). The effect of LS and implant region on accuracy was compared using two-Way ANOVA (&#945;=0.05). Significant greater linear distortion was noted in R4 (61.2±17.9µm) compared to R1 (23.4±15.5µm) and R2 (26±17.7µm) (p&lt;0.01). Greater linear distortions were noted in R4 with D2000 (0.07±0.016 degrees) and Vinyl High Resolution (0.067±0.02 degrees) than inEos X5 (0.032±0.021 degrees) (p&gt;0.05). Greater mean linear precisions were noted in R1 (9±8µm) and R3 (9.3±8.3µm) than R4 (12.6±10.3µm) (p&lt;0.05). The highest linear precision was noted in D2000 (7.2±7.6µm) (p&lt;0.05). The angular precision of D2000 (0.02±0.015 degrees) was the highest (p&lt;0.01). The angular precisión of R4 (0.036±0.018 degrees) was the lowest (p&lt;0.01). This study revealed that the trueness was affected by the implant region and the precision was affected by both LS and implant region.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen Evaluar la precisión del escaneado de la arcada completa con cuerpos de escaneado de titanio de múltiples implantes utilizando escáneres de laboratorio. Se fabricó un modelo maestro de una arcada maxilar edéntula con 6 implantes. Se insertaron cuerpos de escaneo de titanio en el modelo. Se utilizaron tres escáneres de laboratorio: D2000 (3Shape), Vinyl High Resolution (Smart Optics) e inEos X5 (Dentsply Sirona). El modelo maestro se escaneó consecutivamente diez veces usando escáneres de laboratorio dental (LS) sin separar y reposicionar los cuerpos de escaneo. La precisión lineal y angular entre implantes adyacentes se midió utilizando un software de inspección (Control X, Geomagic). Se calculó la precisión de los escaneos completos del arco. Las regiones del implante se definieron como; paralelo (R1: #24-26 y #16-14), angulado (R2: #22-24 y #14-12), angulado al plano oclusal (R3: #12-22) y cruzado (R4: #16-26). El efecto de LS y la región del implante en la precisión se comparó mediante ANOVA de dos vías (&#945;=0,05). Se observó una distorsión lineal significativamente mayor en R4 (61,2±17,9µm) en comparación con R1 (23,4±15,5µm) y R2 (26 ±17,7µm) (p&lt;0,01). Se observaron mayores distorsiones lineales en R4 con D2000 (0,07±0,016 grados) y vinilo de alta resolución (0,067±0,02 grados) que en inEos X5 (0,032±0,021 grados) (p&gt;0,05). Se observaron precisiones lineales medias mayores en R1 (9±8µm) y R3 (9,3±8,3µm) que en R4 (12,6±10,3µm) (p&lt;0,05). La mayor precisión lineal se observó en D2000 (7,2±7,6 µm) (p&lt;0,05). La precisión angular de D2000 (0,02±0,015 grados) fue la más alta (p&lt;0,01). La precisión angular de R4 (0,036±0,018 grados) fue la más baja (p&lt;0,01). Este estudio reveló que la veracidad se vio afectada por la región del implante y la precisión se vio afectada tanto por LS como por la región del implante.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Digitalization]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scan accuracy]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Laboratory scanners]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Titanium scan body]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Multi-unit abutment]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Complete arch]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Digitalización]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Precisión de escaneado]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Escáneres de laboratori]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Cuerpo de escaneado de titanio]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Pilar de varias unidades]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Arcada completa]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Simonis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dufour]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tenenbaum]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Long-term implant survival and success: a 10-16- year follow-up of non-submerged dental implants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<page-range>772-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carlson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carleson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Prosthodontic complications in osseointegrated dental implant treatment]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Implant Dent]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>264</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Papaspyridakos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hogsett]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[White]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lal]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gallucci]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: An optical scanning study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Implants Res.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>676-81</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hebel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gajjar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>77</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>28-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Da Rocha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.V.B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Freitas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De Morais Alves Da Cunha]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent.]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>264-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kwon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bain]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Systematic review of short- (5-10 years) and long-term (10 years or more) survival and success of full-arch fixed dental hybrid prostheses and supporting implants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Dent]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>10</numero>
<issue>10</issue>
<page-range>1228-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kapos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Evans]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[CAD/CAM Technology for Implant Abutments, Crowns, and Superstructures]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>117-36</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Seo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K. young]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>122</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>543-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Knechtle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wiedemeier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mehl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ender]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>128</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>468-78</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mizumoto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Yilmaz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry : A systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>120</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>343-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Li]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Improved scanning accuracy with newly designed scan bodies : An in vitro study comparing digital versus conventional impression techniques for complete-arch implant rehabilitation]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<page-range>625-33</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fluegge]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Att]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metzger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nelson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Novel Method to Evaluate Precision of Optical Implant Impressions with Commer- cial Scan Bodies-An Experimental Approach]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>34-41</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fokas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ma]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chronopoulos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mattheos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Differences in micromorphology of the implant e abutment junction for original and third-party abutments on a representative dental implant]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>121</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>143-50</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Giménez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Özcan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martinez-Rus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pradies]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of a Digital Impression System Based on Parallel Confocal Laser Technology for Implants with Consideration of Operator Experience and Implant Angulation and Depth]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<page-range>853-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rutkunas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ge&#269;iauskaite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jegelevi&#269;ius]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaitiekunas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Oral Implant]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>10</volume>
<page-range>101-20</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wulfman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Naveau]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rignon-Bret]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Digital scanning for complete-arch implant- supported restorations: A systematic review]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>124</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>161-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Assunção]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Britto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ricardo Barão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Delben]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dos Santos]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of Impression Accuracy for Implant at Various Angulations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Implant Dent]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>19</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>167-74</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Abdel-azim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zandinejad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Elathamna]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Influence of Digital Fabrication Options on the Accuracy of Dental Implant-Based Single Units and Complete-Arch Frameworks.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>1281-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Conrad]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pesun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DeLong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hodges]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent.]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>349-56</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Menini]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Setti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pesce]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression : traditional techniques versus a digital procedure]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Invest]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>1253-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fernandez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mendoza]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.Y.P. De]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Platt]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Levon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hovijitra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nimmo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A Comparative Study of the Accuracy between Plastic and Metal Impression Transfer Copings for Implant Restorations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthod]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<page-range>367-76</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Braian]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruyn]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.D.T.H. De]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fransson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Christersson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wennerberg]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Tolerance Measurements on Internal- and External- Hexagon Implants.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>846-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ender]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mehl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of complete- Arch dental impressions: A new method of measuring trueness and precision]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>121-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Emir]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ayy&#305;ld&#305;z]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthodont Res]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>63</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>434-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renne]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ludlow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fryml]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schurch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mennito]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kessler]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>36-42</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González de Villaumbrosia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martínez-Rus]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[García-Orejas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salido]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pradíes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>116</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>543-550.e1.</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tsoi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.K.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.Y.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.H.N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Reproducibility of laboratory scanning of multiple implants in complete edentulous arch: Effect of scan bodies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Dent]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>96</volume>
<page-range>103329</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rcsed]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.R.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Esguerra]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teoh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[In Vitro Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Implant Impressions : The Effect of Implant Angulation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>313-21</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tsoi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lam]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Evaluation of laboratory scanner accuracy by a novel calibration block for complete-arch implant rehabilitation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Dent.]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>102</volume>
<page-range>103476</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sophia]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Xin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keng]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.D.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Implant Impressions : Effect of Interimplant Distance in an Edentulous Arch]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>366-80</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cho]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schaefer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thompson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guentsch]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of casts made by digital and conventional methods]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>113</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>310-5</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ender]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mehl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of complete- arch dental impressions : A new method of measuring trueness and precision.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthet Dent]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>109</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>121-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Winter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mohrle]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Karl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>947-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olea-vielba]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jare]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Methani]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of the Implant Replica Positions on the Complete Edentulous Additive Manufactured Cast]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Prosthod]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<numero>9</numero>
<issue>9</issue>
<page-range>780-6</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Thanasrisuebwong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kulchotirat]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Anunmana]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Effects of inter-implant distance on the accuracy of intraoral scanner : An in vitro study]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Adv Prosthodont]]></source>
<year>2021</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>13</numero>
<issue>13</issue>
<page-range>107-16</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kim]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lee]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cheong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Comparison of intraoral and extraoral digital scanners: Evaluation of surface topography and precision]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Dent J.]]></source>
<year>2020</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ebeid]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nouh]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ashraf]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cesar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of different laboratory scanners for scanning of implant-supported full arch fixed prosthesis]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Esthet Restor Dent]]></source>
<year>2022</year>
<volume>34</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>843-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Güth]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Runkel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beuer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stimmelmayr]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Edelhoff]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Keul]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Accuracy of five intraoral scanners compared to indirect digitalization]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Clin Oral Investig]]></source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>1445-55</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
