<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>2215-3411</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Odovtos]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>2215-3411</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Facultad de Odontología. Universidad de Costa Rica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S2215-34112021000300010</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15517/ijds.2021.46343</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Revisión por pares en la publicación científica: recomendaciones desde ODOVTOS]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Peer reviews in scientific journals: Recommendations from ODOVTOS]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Reyes-Carmona]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Jessie]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Costa Rica Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>Costa Rica</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>23</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>10</fpage>
<lpage>22</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S2215-34112021000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S2215-34112021000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S2215-34112021000300010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Resumen El proceso editorial de una revista, específicamente la revisión por pares, valida la publicación científica con el respaldo de la experiencia y el conocimiento de los revisores. Sin embargo, a pesar de que existen programas que capacitan en la parte investigativa a los miembros de la comunidad científica, son escasas las herramientas de capacitación para participar en el arbitraje de un manuscrito. El propósito de este artículo es presentar una guía con una serie de recomendaciones sobre cómo un artículo científico debe ser revisado por pares. Se realiza una sumatoria de recomendaciones y criterios que servirán para que los revisores de Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences puedan utilizar como referencia y respaldo para su labor.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Abstract The editorial process of a journal, specifically peer review, validates the scientific publication supported by the experience and knowledge of the reviewers. However, despite the fact that there are programs that instruct members of the scientific community in research, there are few training tools to participate in the arbitration of a manuscript. The purpose of this article was to present a guide with a series of recommendations on how a scientific article should be peer-reviewed. A synopsis of recommendations and criteria is presented and will be used by the reviewers of Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences as a reference to support their work.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Arbitraje]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Revisión por pares]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Proceso editorial]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Publicación científica.]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Peer review]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Editorial process]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Scientific publication.]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lippi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ann Transl Med]]></source>
<year>2018</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>68</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mayden]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Peer review: publication's gold standard]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J Adv Pract Oncol]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<page-range>117-22</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gasparyan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.Y.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kitas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Croat Med J.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>53</volume>
<page-range>386-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jefferson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rudin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Brodney Folse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Cochrane Database Syst Rev]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>MR000016</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mc Peek]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[The Golden Rule of Reviewing]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Am. Nat]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>173</volume>
<page-range>E155-8</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hames]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Irene]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Peer review and manuscript management in scientific journals: guidelines for good practice]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[John Wiley &amp; Sons]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>International Committee of Medical Journal Editors</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[What is peer review? Elsevier]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Peer Review Process. Odovtos, About the journal]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<collab>Council of Science Editors</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Reviewer roles and responsibilities]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
