<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>1409-4568</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Enfermería Actual de Costa Rica]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Enfermería Actual de Costa Rica]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>1409-4568</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Costa Rica ]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S1409-45682017000200043</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15517/revenf.v0i33.29644</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Uso del balón cervical vs. prostaglandinas endocervicales para la inducción del parto en embarazo a término: revisión breve de literatura]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Use of the cervical balloon vs. endocervical prostaglandins for the induction of labor in term pregnancy: literature brief review]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Usando a bola cervical vs prostaglandinas endocervicais para indução do parto em gestação a termo: breve revisão da literatura]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aguilar Sánchez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Pamela]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mora Gómez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Raquel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="Af1">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Costa Rica  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>CR</country>
</aff>
<aff id="Af2">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad de Costa Rica  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
<country>CR</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>33</numero>
<fpage>43</fpage>
<lpage>60</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S1409-45682017000200043&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S1409-45682017000200043&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S1409-45682017000200043&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[ResumenLas prácticas del cuidado del embarazo y el parto varían ampliamente entre los países, las instituciones y los diferentes equipos encargados del cuidado obstétrico: en este contexto con prácticas tan diversas, la práctica clínica basada en la evidencia permite que el accionar de los profesionales encargados del cuidado obstétrico se fundamente en la mejor evidencia disponible. El objetivo del presente estudio es analizar la mejor evidencia científica disponible sobre los efectos adversos del uso del balón cervical durante y posterior a la labor de parto, en comparación con el uso de prostaglandinas endocervicales para la inducción del parto en mujeres con embarazo a término. La secuencia de etapas para la recolección de la información se inició con la aplicación del mapa de búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, PUBMED y COCHRANE LIBRARY, a partir de los siguientes criterios de filtro de información: artículos publicados entre los años 2010 al 2015, mujeres gestantes de cualquier edad, únicamente se incluyó estudios como ensayos aleatorizados controlados, revisiones sistemáticas, meta-análisis o guías de práctica clínica y de preferencia artículos científicos en idioma inglés o portugués. Esta búsqueda y análisis de la evidencia encontrada se realizó durante los meses de abril y mayo del año 2015 por dos revisores. Los resultados obtenidos para el análisis crítico fueron revisados minuciosamente a través de la plataforma informática FCL 2.0 con las plantillas de ensayo clínico y revisión sistemática incluidas en los anexos. Se concluye que la utilización del balón endocervical comparado con el uso de prostaglandinas endocervicales presenta menos efectos adversos de manera específica durante la labor del parto. En relación con los efectos adversos posteriores, no se encuentra mayor diferencia entre uno u otro método.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[AbstractPregnancy and childbirth care practices vary widely across countries, institutions, and different obstetrical care teams: in this context with such diverse practices, evidence-based clinical practice allows the Obstetric care is based on the best available evidence. The objective of the present study is to analyze the best available scientific evidence on the adverse effects of cervical balloon use during and after labor, compared to the use of endocervical prostaglandins for induction of labor in women with term pregnancy. The sequence of steps for the collection of information was initiated with the application of the search map in the databases MEDLINE, PUBMED and COCHRANE LIBRARY, based on the following information filter criteria: articles published between the years 2010 to 2015, Pregnant women of any age, only included studies such as randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyzes or guidelines of clinical practice and preferably scientific papers in English or Portuguese. This search and analysis of the evidence found was carried out during the months of April and May of the year 2015 by two reviewers. The results obtained for the critical analysis were carefully reviewed through the FCL 2.0 computer platform with the clinical trial templates and systematic review included in the annexes. It is concluded that the use of the endocervical balloon compared to the use of endocervical prostaglandins presents less adverse effects specifically during labor. In relation to the subsequent adverse effects, no greater difference is found between one or the other method.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[ResumoPráticas de cuidados a gravidez eo parto variam amplamente entre os países, instituições e diferentes equipas de cuidados obstétricos; neste contexto como práticas diversas, a prática clínica baseada em evidências permite que as ações dos profissionais responsáveis pela assistência obstétrica é baseada na melhor evidência disponível. O objetivo deste estudo é analisar a melhor evidência científica disponível sobre os efeitos adversos durante e após o parto com o uso de bola cervical em comparação com o uso de prostaglandina endocervical para indução do parto em mulheres com gravidez a termo. A sequência dos passos para a recolha de dados começa com a busca do mapa aplicação em Medline, PubMed e os dados Cochrane Library, onde os seguintes critérios de filtro de informação artigos introduzidos foram seleccionados publicação período entre 2010 e 2015, a população foi delimitada a mulheres grávidas de qualquer idade, digite apenas ensaios estudos clínicos randomizados, revisões sistemáticas, meta-análises ou diretrizes de prática clínica e artigos científicos de preferência em Inglês ou Português foram incluídos. Esta pesquisa e análise da evidência encontrada foi realizado durante os meses de Abril e Maio de 2015, dois colaboradores. Os resultados obtidos para a análise crítica foram cuidadosamente controlados através da plataforma FCL computador 2,0 modelos ensaio clínico e revisão sistemática estão incluídos nos anexos. Concluiu-se que o uso de bola endocervical em comparação com a utilização de prostaglandinas endocervicais tem menos efeitos adversos especificamente durante o trabalho de parto. Em ligação com os efeitos adversos subsequentes não é maior diferença entre qualquer um dos métodos.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[balón-endocervical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[catéter-Foley]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[inducción-del-parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[prostaglandinas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[endocervical-balloon]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Foley-catheter]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[labor-induction]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[prostaglandins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[a-indução-do-parto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[catéter-de-Foley]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[esferas-endocervical]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[prostaglandinas]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cunningham]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Obstetricia de Williams]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<edition>23a</edition>
<page-range>1400</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[México DF ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mc Graw Hill Interamericana]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Maduración cervical: aceleración de un proceso natural]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonzales-Boubeta]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cid-Gonzalez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Matronas profesión]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>8</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>24-9</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ladewig]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PW]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[London]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[ML]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Morberly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SM]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Olds]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[SB]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Enfermería Maternal y del Recién Nacido]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<edition>5a</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Madrid ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Mc Graw Hill Interamericana]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cómo buscar (y encontrar) evidencia científica en salud: el planteamiento de la búsqueda]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Salas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nure Investigación]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>55</numero>
<issue>55</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Enfermería Basada en la Evidencia. Orígenes y fundamentos para una práctica enfermera basada en la Evidencia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alcolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nure Investigación]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>52</numero>
<issue>52</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Enfermería basada en la evidencia, una ruta hacia la aplicación en la práctica profesional]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ramírez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Paravic]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Enfermería en Costa Rica]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>89-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Induction of labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2 gel]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pennell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CE]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Henderson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O'Neill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MJ]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McChlery]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Doherty]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DA]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Dickinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[JE]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[BJOG]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>116</volume>
<numero>11</numero>
<issue>11</issue>
<page-range>1442-52</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oliveira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[MV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oberst]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PV]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Leite]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[GK]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>32</volume>
<numero>7</numero>
<issue>7</issue>
<page-range>346-51</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cromi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[f]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ghezzi]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Agosti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>204</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>338-43</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Intravaginal misoprostol versus Foley catheter for labour induction: a meta-analysis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fox]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[NS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Saltzman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[DH]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[AS]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klauser]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[CK]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Moshier]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rebarber]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[BJOG]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>118</volume>
<numero>6</numero>
<issue>6</issue>
<page-range>647-54</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jozwiak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oude]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benthem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Lancet]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>378</volume>
<numero>9808</numero>
<issue>9808</issue>
<page-range>2095-103</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Las segundas partes sí pueden ser mejores: Algunas Reflexiones sobre el uso de datos secundarios en la investigación cualitativa]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Scribano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[De La Sena]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Sociologías]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>11</volume>
<numero>22</numero>
<issue>22</issue>
<page-range>100-18</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Fases de la práctica clínica basada en la evidencia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alcolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nure Investigación]]></source>
<year>2011</year>
<numero>53</numero>
<issue>53</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Planteamiento de la pregunta clínica. Cómo formular preguntas clínicas de manera adecuada]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Alcolea]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oter]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Martín]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Nure Investigación]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<numero>54</numero>
<issue>54</issue>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La valoración crítica de documentos científicos y su aplicabilidad a la práctica clínica: aspecto clave en la toma de decisiones basada en las mejores pruebas científicas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Buñuel]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ochoa]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Evid Pediatr]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>2</volume>
<page-range>37</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[La Práctica Clínica basada en la Evidencia]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cañón]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo]]></source>
<year>2007</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>97-106</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Actualización en el uso de uterotónicos]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Muñoz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munar]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lopez]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>91-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[A randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal insert versus double-balloon catheter]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cromi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ghezzi]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Tomera]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Uccella]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lischetti]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bolis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[PF]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Int J Gynaecol Obstet.]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>207</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>125.e1-7</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Foley catheter balloon vs locally applied prostaglandins for cervical ripening and labor induction: a systematic review and metaanalysis]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vaknin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kurzweil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sherman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Am J Obstet Gynecol.]]></source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>203</volume>
<numero>5</numero>
<issue>5</issue>
<page-range>418-29</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<article-title xml:lang=""><![CDATA[Foley catheter or prostaglandin E2 inserts for induction of labour at term: an open-label randomized controlled trial (PROBAAT-P trial) and systematic review of literature]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Jozwiak]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Oude Rengerink]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Benthem]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol.]]></source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>137-45</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
