<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0034-7744</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Biología Tropical]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. biol. trop]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0034-7744</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Costa Rica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0034-77442014000700010</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The status of coral reefs and associated fishes and invertebrates of commercial importance in Pedro Bank, Jamaica]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Estado de los arrecifes de coral y comunidades de peces e invertebrados con interés comercial asociadas al Banco de Pedro, Jamaica]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruckner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Andrew W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Beck]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Brian]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Renaud]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Phil]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Landover MD]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>62</volume>
<fpage>258</fpage>
<lpage>268</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0034-77442014000700010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0034-77442014000700010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0034-77442014000700010&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The coral reefs located off the north coast of the Jamaican mainland are some of the best and most studied reefs in the world. Coral reefs of Pedro Bank, Jamaica were assessed in March, 2012 as part of the KSLOF Global Reef Expedition using a modified Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) protocol. The main objectives were to: 1) characterize the distribution, structure and health of coral reefs; and 2) evaluate the population status of commercially important reef fishes and invertebrates. This work was conducted to assist in characterizing coral reef habitats within and outside a proposed fishery reserve, and identify other possible conservation zones. Within 20 reefs, live coral cover ranged from 4.9% to 19.2%. Coral communities were dominated by small corals (esp. Agaricia, Porites and Siderastrea) although many sites had high abundances of large colonies of Montastraea annularis and M. faveolata, and these were generally in good condition. A single area, within the proposed fishery reserve, had extensive Acropora cervicornis thickets, and several shallow locations had small, but recovering A. palmata stands. Macroalgal cover at all sites was relatively low, with only three sites having greater than 30% cover; crustose coralline algae (CCA) was high, with eight sites exceeding 20% cover. Fish biomass at all sites near the Cays was low, with a dominance of herbivores (parrotfish and surgeonfish) and a near absence of groupers, snappers and other commercially important species. While parrotfish were the most abundant fish, these were all extremely small (mean size= 12cm; <4% over 29cm), and they were dominated by red band parrotfish (Sparisoma aurofrenatum) followed by striped parrotfish (Scarus iseri). While coral communities remain in better condition than most coastal reefs in Jamaica, intense fishing pressure using fish traps (main target species: surgeonfish) and hookah/spear fishing (main target: parrotfish) is of grave concern to the future persistence of these reefs. The proposed fishery reserve encompasses some of the best coral reef habitat near the Cays, but this MPA should be expanded to encompass other habitats and MPAs should be considered for bank reefs at the northwestern end, as well as Banner Reef and Blowers Rock.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[Los arrecifes de coral ubicados en la costa norte de Jamaica son los mejores y mas estudiados corales del mundo. Los corales de arrecife del Banco de Pedro, Jamaica, fueron evaluados en marzo 2012 como parte de la expedición global KSLOF utilizando una modificación del protocolo de estimación rápida de arrecifes para el Atlántico y el Caribe (AGRRA). Los objetivos principales fueron: 1) caracterizar la distribución, estructura y salud de los arrecifes de coral; y 2) evaluar la condición de las poblaciones de peces arrecifales e invertebrados de interés comercial. Este trabajo fue realizado con el propósito de colaborar en la caracterización de hábitats arrecifales, tanto dentro como fuera de un área sugerida como reserva marina, e identificar otras áreas de conservación. Para los 20 arrecifes, la cobertura de coral vivo varió entre 4.9% y 19.2%. Las comunidades de corales son dominadas por corales pequeños (Agaricia, Porites y Siderastrea), aunque en varias localidades se presentó una mayor abundancia de colonias grandes de M. annularis y M. faveolata, y estos se encontraban por lo general en buenas condiciones. Dentro de la reserva pesquera propuesta, una sola área presentó fragmentos de A. cervicornis, y varias localidades someras presentaron pequeños fragmentos de A. palmata, pero en proceso de recuperación. La cobertura de macroalgas en todas las áreas fue relativamente baja, solo tres lugares presentaron más de un 30%; la cobertura de algas coralinas calcárea (CCA) fue alta, ocho lugares excedieron el 20%. La biomasa de peces fue baja en todos los sitios cercanos a los cayos, y hubo dominancia de herbívoros (pez loro y cirujanos), y en general ausencia de chernas, pargos y otras especies de peces de interés comercial. Aunque los peces loro fueron los más abundantes, estos presentaron tamaños extremadamente pequeños (tamaño promedio = 12cm; <4% por encima de 29cm), y estuvieron dominados por el pez loro de banda roja (Sparisoma aurofrenatum), y por el pez loro de rayas (Scarus iseri). Mientras que las comunidades de coral permanecen en mejor condición que muchos de los arrecifes costeros de Jamaica, existe una intensa presión pesquera usando trampas de pesca (principal objetivo: cirujanos) y de compresores de aire (hookah)/ pesca con arpón (principal objetivo: pez loro) es preocupante, y compromete la persistencia y el futuro de estos arrecifes. La reserva marina (MPA) que se sugiere incluye algunos de los mejores hábitats de arrecife coralino cerca de los cayos, pero es recomendable que se amplíe para incluir otros hábitats y que se consideren áreas marinas protegidas en los bancos de arrecife del extremo noroeste, así como el arrecife Banner y Blowers Rock.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Pedro Bank]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Jamaica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[coral reef health]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[fish community structure]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[marine protected areas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Banco de Pedro]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[Jamaica]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[salud del arrecife de coral]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[estructura comunitaria de peces]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="es"><![CDATA[áreas marinas protegidas]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <div style="text-align: justify;">     <div style="text-align: center;"><font style="font-weight: bold;"  size="4"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The status of coral reefs and associated fishes and invertebrates of commercial importance in Pedro Bank, Jamaica    <br>     <br> </span></font><font style="font-weight: bold;" size="4"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">Estado de los arrecifes de coral y comunidades de peces e invertebrados con inter&eacute;s comercial asociadas al Banco de Pedro, Jamaica</span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-weight: bold;"></span> </span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> </div> <br style="font-family: verdana;">     <div style="text-align: center;"><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">Andrew W. Bruckner<sup><a href="#1">1</a><a  name="2"></a>*</sup>, Brian Beck<a href="#1"><sup>1</sup></a></span></font><sup><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font></sup><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"> &amp; Phil Renaud</span></font><a href="#1"><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"><sup>1</sup></span></font></a><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> </div> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     <div style="text-align: justify;"><font style="font-weight: bold;"  size="3"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Abstract</span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> </div> <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The coral reefs located off the north coast of the Jamaican mainland are some of the best and most studied reefs in the world. Coral reefs of Pedro Bank, Jamaica were assessed in March, 2012 as part of the KSLOF Global Reef Expedition using a modified Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) protocol. The main objectives were to: 1) characterize the distribution, structure and health of coral reefs; and 2) evaluate the population status of commercially important reef fishes and invertebrates. This work was conducted to assist in characterizing coral reef habitats within and outside a proposed fishery reserve, and identify other possible conservation zones. Within 20 reefs, live coral cover ranged from 4.9% to 19.2%. Coral communities were dominated by small corals (esp. <span style="font-style: italic;">Agaricia</span>, <span  style="font-style: italic;">Porites </span>and <span  style="font-style: italic;">Siderastrea</span>) although many sites had high abundances of large colonies of <span  style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea annularis</span> and <span style="font-style: italic;">M. faveolata</span>, and these were generally in good condition. A single area, within the proposed fishery reserve, had extensive <span  style="font-style: italic;">Acropora cervicornis</span> thickets, and several shallow locations had small, but recovering <span style="font-style: italic;">A. palmata</span> stands. Macroalgal cover at all sites was relatively low, with only three sites having greater than 30% cover; crustose coralline algae (CCA) was high, with eight sites exceeding 20% cover. Fish biomass at all sites near the Cays was low, with a dominance of herbivores (parrotfish and surgeonfish) and a near absence of groupers, snappers and other commercially important species. While parrotfish were the most abundant fish, these were all extremely small (mean size= 12cm; &lt;4% over 29cm), and they were dominated by red band parrotfish (<span style="font-style: italic;">Sparisoma aurofrenatum</span>) followed by striped parrotfish (<span style="font-style: italic;">Scarus iseri</span>). While coral communities remain in better condition than most coastal reefs in Jamaica, intense fishing pressure using fish traps (main target species: surgeonfish) and hookah/spear fishing (main target: parrotfish) is of grave concern to the future persistence of these reefs. The proposed fishery reserve encompasses some of the best coral reef habitat near the Cays, but this MPA should be expanded to encompass other habitats and MPAs should be considered for bank reefs at the northwestern end, as well as Banner Reef and Blowers Rock.</span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span  style="font-weight: bold;">Key words:</span> Pedro Bank, Jamaica, coral reef health, fish community structure, marine protected areas.</span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">Resumen</span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;">     <br>     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Los arrecifes de     coral     ubicados     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[en la costa norte de Jamaica son los mejores y mas estudiados corales     del mundo. Los corales de arrecife del Banco de Pedro, Jamaica, fueron     evaluados en marzo 2012 como parte de la expedici&oacute;n global KSLOF     utilizando una modificaci&oacute;n del protocolo de estimaci&oacute;n     r&aacute;pida de arrecifes para el Atl&aacute;ntico y el Caribe     (AGRRA). Los objetivos principales fueron: 1) caracterizar la     distribuci&oacute;n, estructura y salud de los arrecifes de coral; y 2)     evaluar la condici&oacute;n de las poblaciones de peces arrecifales e     invertebrados de inter&eacute;s comercial. Este trabajo fue realizado     con el prop&oacute;sito de colaborar en la caracterizaci&oacute;n de     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[h&aacute;bitats arrecifales, tanto dentro como fuera de un &aacute;rea     sugerida como reserva marina, e identificar otras &aacute;reas de     conservaci&oacute;n. Para los 20 arrecifes, la cobertura de coral vivo     vari&oacute; entre 4.9% y 19.2%. Las comunidades de corales son     dominadas por corales peque&ntilde;os (</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Agaricia</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">, </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Porites </span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">y </span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Siderastrea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">), aunque en varias     localidades se present&oacute; una mayor     abundancia de colonias grandes de <span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span> y </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     faveolata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">, y estos     se encontraban por lo general en buenas condiciones. Dentro de la     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[reserva pesquera propuesta, una sola &aacute;rea present&oacute;     fragmentos de <span style="font-style: italic;">A. cervicorni</span>s,     y varias localidades someras presentaron     peque&ntilde;os fragmentos de </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">A.     palmata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">, pero en proceso de     recuperaci&oacute;n. La cobertura de macroalgas en todas las     &aacute;reas fue relativamente baja, solo tres lugares presentaron     m&aacute;s de un 30%; la cobertura de algas coralinas calc&aacute;rea     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(CCA) fue alta, ocho lugares excedieron el 20%. La biomasa de peces fue     baja en todos los sitios cercanos a los cayos, y hubo dominancia de     herb&iacute;voros (pez loro y cirujanos), y en general ausencia de     chernas, pargos y otras especies de peces de inter&eacute;s comercial.     Aunque los peces loro fueron los m&aacute;s abundantes, estos     presentaron tama&ntilde;os extremadamente peque&ntilde;os     (tama&ntilde;o promedio = 12cm; &lt;4% por encima de 29cm), y     estuvieron dominados por el pez loro de banda roja (</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Sparisoma aurofrenatum</span></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">), y por el pez loro de     rayas (</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Scarus iseri</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">). Mientras que     las comunidades de coral permanecen en mejor condici&oacute;n que     muchos de los arrecifes costeros de Jamaica, existe una intensa     presi&oacute;n pesquera usando trampas de pesca (principal objetivo:     cirujanos) y de compresores de aire (hookah)/ pesca con arp&oacute;n     (principal objetivo: pez loro) es preocupante, y compromete la     persistencia y el futuro de estos arrecifes. La reserva marina (MPA)     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[que se sugiere incluye algunos de los mejores h&aacute;bitats de     arrecife coralino cerca de los cayos, pero es recomendable que se     ampl&iacute;e para incluir otros h&aacute;bitats y que se consideren     &aacute;reas marinas protegidas en los bancos de arrecife del extremo     noroeste, as&iacute; como el arrecife Banner y Blowers Rock.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Palabras clave:</span> Banco de Pedro,     Jamaica, salud del arrecife de coral, estructura comunitaria de peces,     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[&aacute;reas marinas protegidas.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <br style="font-family: verdana;">     <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">The coral reefs     located off the     north coast of the Jamaican mainland are some of the best and most     studied reefs in the world (Hughes, 1994). In contrast, very few     studies have been conducted on the banks located off the south coast of     Jamaica. The first and only comprehensive coral reef assessment was     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[conducted on a portion of Pedro Bank in 2005 (Kramer, 2006). Other     studies have focused on fisheries, socioeconomics and terrestrial     assessments (Nicholson &amp; Hartsuijter, 1982; Munro, 1983; Koslow,     Hanley &amp; Wicklund, 1988; Espuet, 2006; Hay, 2006; Kramer, 2006).     These studies have documented the progressive expansion of human     populations on the Cays during the 1990s, and their effects on the     reefs and associated resources. The importance of the Pedro Bank as a     base for fishing has steadily increased as Jamaica&#8217;s nearshore     fisheries continue to decline. The influx of fishermen, together with     the adoption of more efficient and destructive fishing techniques such     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[as Antillean Z-traps and hookah spearfishing is leading to the     overexploitation of lobster, conch, and finfish throughout Pedro Bank     (Aiken &amp; Kong, 2000; Koslow et al., 1988; Munro, 1983; Nicholson     &amp; Hartsuijker, 1982). Further, the increase in permanent     inhabitants on Pedro Cays has resulted in destruction of coastal     vegetation, excessive trash and marine debris, discharge of untreated     sewage into surrounding waters, and diminished habitat for nesting     turtles and seabirds (Espeut, 2006; Hay, 2006).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Since the mid-2000s,     conservation     agencies in Jamaica have been working to implement the Pedro Bank Coral     Reef Management Project. This project has included biological and     socioeconomic assessments, feasibility studies, and efforts to control     and minimize overfishing and degradation of coral reefs and coral cays     due to unsustainable human settlement. A primary goal has involved the     development of a zoning strategy, including the adoption of a fishery     reserve off southwest Cay. To help inform constituents of the value of     these resources and the benefits that would ensue through establishment     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[of networks of marine protected areas (MPAs), KSLOF and partners     conducted an extensive survey of coral reef habitats within Pedro Bank.     The current research used the Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment     (AGRRA) protocol, which is the same methodology applied in 2005     (Kramer, 2006). The areas assessed in 2005 were reevaluated during this     study, and we expanded the surveys to new locations. Here we present     data on the status of coral reefs and changes that have occurred since     2005, and provide recommendations on potential sites that would benefit     from protection as MPAs.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">Materials and Methods</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Study sites:</span> Pedro Bank is a     submerged bank rising abruptly from about 500m depth. It is located     about 58km off Jamaica at its closest point (Portland Point), and     roughly 98km from Kingston, Jamaica. It extends over an area of 8     040k</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> and has a circumference     of roughly 590km. Much of the bank is     relatively shallow (about 10-24m depth) with extensive seagrass beds,     rubble and sandy habitats, and scattered patch reefs. The bank     gradually deepens in a NW direction. The south and southeast sides of     the bank face into the Caribbean current and have the best developed     reefs. The coral reef community structure was assessed at 20 sites     along the S/SE sides, within 18 fore reef locations and two patch reefs     (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10t1.gif">Table 1</a>). At each     site, data were collected on benthic community     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[structure, corals, fishes and motile invertebrates using the Atlantic     and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGRRA) protocol.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Benthic cover:</span> Cover of benthic     organisms was estimated using a minimum of six 10m long transects per     site (158 transects total) and one to three 10m x 1m photo-transects.     The organism and substrate type were recorded every 10cm for a total of     100 points per transect. Substrates were categorized as hard-ground,     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[rubble, sand/silt, live coral, and dead coral. All corals were     identified to species and recorded as live, bleached, recently dead or     long dead. Other invertebrates were identified to the lowest taxonomic     level possible. Algae were divided into five functional groups (fleshy     macroalgae, erect coralline algae, crustose coralline algae, turf     algae, cyanobacteria). Additional measurements of algal height were     recorded for macroalgae.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Coral:</span> Coral species diversity,     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[abundance, size structure and health were assessed with 74 belt     transects, each 1 x 10m in length. Each coral within the 10</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> area, 4cm     or larger in diameter, was identified, measured (length, width and     height) and assessed. Visual estimates of tissue loss were recorded for     each colony using a 1m bar marked in 1cm increments for scale. If the     coral exhibited tissue loss, estimates of the amount of remaining     tissue and percent that died were made based on the entire colony     surface. Tissue loss was categorized as recent mortality (white     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[skeleton, occurring within the last 1-5 days), transitional mortality     (exposed skeleton with filamentous green algae and diatom colonization,     6-30 days) and old mortality (&gt;30 days). For each coral with partial     or whole colony mortality, the cause of mortality was identified if     possible. The diagnosis included an assessment of the type of disease,     extent of bleaching, predation, competition, overgrowth or other causes     of mortality. Each coral was first carefully examined to identify     cryptic predators. Lesions were diagnosed into four categories: recent     tissue loss, skeletal damage, color change, and unusual growth     patterns; an individual colony could have multiple characteristics     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(e.g. color change and recent tissue loss). The location (apical,     basal, medial) and pattern of tissue loss (linear, annular, focal,     multifocal, and coalescing) were recorded, and a field name (e.g. black     band disease, yellow band disease, dark spots disease) was assigned.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The abundance of     recruits (corals     smaller than 4cm) was assessed using a minimum of five 0.25m<sup>2</sup>     quadrats     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[per transect, with each quadrat located at fixed, predetermined     intervals (2, 4, 6, 8, 10m, alternating between right and left side of     the transect line). Recruits were identified in both benthic and coral     transects. Recruits were divided into two categories: &lt;2cm diameter     and 2-3.9cm diameter.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Motile invertebrates:</span> The abundance     of large motile invertebrates (crustaceans, molluscs and echinoderms)     was quantified using random circular plots, each 10m diameter (total     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[area = 314</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">), with 1-4 plots assessed per reef. One     diver would extend     a 10m line from a central point and then swim slowly in a circle while     a second diver would record the numbers of each species of invertebrate     seen within the plot. Additional roving surveys were undertaken to     assess presence of invertebrates in cryptic areas, including ledges and     caves. Invertebrates were also counted and recorded within coral belt     transects.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Reef fish:</span> The reef fish assemblage     (approximately 70 species) was quantified within a minimum of six 30 x     2m belt transects per site (187 transects total). All species were     identified and their size was estimated to the nearest 5cm using a     T-bar marked in 5cm increments for scale. The assessment focused on     species that are ecologically relevant to the health of reefs and also     important for commercial or recreational fisheries, with emphasis on     herbivores, invertivores and larger piscivores. Roving surveys were     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[also undertaken to characterize species diversity.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Data analysis:</span> All data were     initially entered into Microsoft Excel spreadsheets with PRIMER     software used for graphical and comparative analysis. Species     diversity, richness and evenness was calculated using the Shannon &#8211;     Weiner index (H`): [H` = - &#931;i pi (log pi)]; Margalef&#8217;s species richness     (d): d = (S - 1)/ log (N), where S= number of species; N = number of     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[individuals; and Pielou&#8217;s evenness (J`): J` = H`/ log (S) to determine     how evenly individuals were distributed among different species.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Clustering of     benthic data, coral     composition and fish biomass/abundance by site was examined using     multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) followed by similarity profiles     (SIMPROF) analysis to determine the factors that contribute most to a     particular grouping. Individual contribution (e.g. fish taxa, fish     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[functional groups, coral species) to the similarity of resulting groups     was estimated using the similarity percentage (SIMPER) analysis of     untransformed datasets. SIMPER analysis results were visually inspected     and biotopes were determined based on similarities, dissimilarities,     taxa distribution and relative abundance (semi-quantitative data).     Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) testing was also employed to evaluate     relationships between benthic and fish attributes. These tests compare     sites based upon ranked, species similarity measures. Coral species     abundances were log transformed to create a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity     matrix (d). ANOSIM results were graphically interpreted using     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[non-metric, multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) (Clarke &amp; Warwick,     2001; Clarke &amp; Gorley, 2006).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">A <span      style="font-style: italic; font-weight: bold;">Reef Health Index</span>     (RHI) was     calculated for each dive site using seven specific biological     indicators assessed during the field surveys. The grades were     calculated by converting the mean for each indicator into a rank of 1     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(critical) to 5 (very good). Seven parameters, grouped into two     categories, were used: a <span style="font-style: italic;">Coral Index</span>,     comprised of coral cover, coral     disease prevalence and coral recruitment; and a Reef <span      style="font-style: italic;">Biota Index</span>,     comprised of a macroalgal index, herbivorous fish abundance (parrotfish     and surgeon fish only), commercial fish abundance (grouper and snapper     only), and <span style="font-style: italic;">Diadema</span> abundance.     The ranked scores of the three <span style="font-style: italic;">Coral     </span>measures and the four <span style="font-style: italic;">Reef     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[Biota</span> measures and these two sub-indices     were then averaged to calculate an integrated reef health index.     Threshold values for each rank were based on data ranges presented in     the Healthy Reef Initiative report (HRI, 2008).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">Results</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Benthic community structure:</span> Within     coral reef habitats, over 60% of the bottom was covered by algae, most     of which was fleshy and erect coralline macroalgae (31%) and crustose     coralline algae (18%). Live coral cover ranged from 4.9% (PB-01) to     19.2% (PB-20). Mean cover of other invertebrates was 14.5%, while 12.3%     of the bottom consisted of uncolonized substrate (sand, rubble or     hardground); 1% was dead coral (<a      href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i1.jpg">Fig. 1</a>). Sites contained     a total of 33     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[species of scleractinian corals. The most abundant corals were </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Agaricia</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">, </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Siderastrea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">, </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Porites </span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">and the </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea annularis</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> complex,     respectively (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i2.jpg">Fig. 2</a>).     Most corals were small (mean     diameter= 20cm),     with 30% of all colonies 21cm or larger and 2% of the corals 100cm or     larger (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i3.jpg">Fig. 3</a>). The     only corals with a mean     diameter that exceeded     20cm were the </span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> complex, <span      style="font-style: italic;">M. cavernosa</span>, <span      style="font-style: italic;">Colpophyllia natans</span>,     <span style="font-style: italic;">Dendrogyra cylindricus</span>, <span      style="font-style: italic;">Acropora palmata</span> and </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">A. cervicorni</span>s</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> (<a     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i4.jpg">Fig. 4</a>).     A     single taxon, </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     faveolata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">, was dominated by colonies that     exceeded     50cm. All corals exhibited a very low percent partial mortality (mean=     10%) and virtually no recent or transitional mortality (&lt;1%). The     greatest amount of partial tissue loss was observed in the largest     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[corals, including </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">C.     natans</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;"></span>     (20%), </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">M. annularis</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> (22%) and </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">M. faveolata</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(27%) (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i5.jpg">Fig. 5</a>). Coral     recruits were dominated by <span style="font-style: italic;">S. siderea</span>     (27%), </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">P.     astreoides </span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     cavernosa</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (7%), Favia fragum     (6.5%) and Meandrina meandrites (5.8%), with all species (pooled)     occurring at a density of 3.3/</span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (<a      href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i6.jpg">Fig. 6</a>).    <br>     <br>     </span></font>     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Reef fish communities:</span> Reef fish     populations exhibited a fairly low diversity (116 species), abundance     (65 fish/100</span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">), size (mean=13cm) and biomass (9     430g/100</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">).     Populations were dominated by herbivores, with parrotfish occurring at     the highest density (25fish/100</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">). </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Sparisoma     aurofrenatum</span></span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;"> (redband     parrotfish) and </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Scarus     iseri</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (striped parrotfish) were most     abundant,     but all parrotfish were exceptionally small (mean=12cm total length)     including terminal phase fish (18% were 21-29cm and 3% were 31-40cm).     Other abundant species were surgeonfish (11fish/100</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">), wrasses     (9fish/100</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">), and grunts (6fish/100</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">); most other functional     groups     had a density of &lt;1 fish/100</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">.</span></font><br     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">All species of fish     were small;     over 78% were less than 20cm and only 3.5% were over 30cm. Overall     biomass of reef fishes was low; herbivores had the greatest biomass, at     5 500g/100</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> followed by invertivores (2 965g/100</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">). Triggerfish     contributed most to the biomass of invertivores, with the abundance of     these species increasing with distance from the Cays. Many functional     groups of fishes were rare or absent including all snappers, large     serranids (populations consisted only of hinds and graysby), barracuda,     morays, grunts, and angelfish. Commercially significant species showed     the lowest numbers and biomass overall, emphasizing the heavy fishing     pressure occurring on Pedro Bank.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Although fish     populations remain     healthier on Pedro Bank than that observed off mainland Jamaica, fish     community structure has shown substantial changes since 2 005 surveys     (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i7.jpg">Fig. 7</a>). Most     importantly, the abundance and biomass of surgeonfishes     has declined quite substantially. Parrotfish abundances are slightly     higher than that recorded in 2005, but the biomass for the two time     periods is virtually the same, suggesting the average size of     individual fish has declined over this period. In sites closest to the     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[fishing village (0 to 10mi) the total biomass declined by 36% and the     biomass of herbivores declined by 46% between 2005 and 2012. The     biomass also markedly increased at a distance of 10mi from the fishing     village in 2005, while the biomass in 2012 showed no increase except at     distances of 20mi or more from the Cays.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Motile invertebrates:</span> Commercially     important (<span style="font-style: italic;">Panulirus, Strombus</span>)     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[and ecologically important motile     invertebrates <span style="font-style: italic;">(Diadema</span>, sea     cucumbers, large crabs, octopus) were     present in extremely low abundances. Queen conch were observed on 9     reefs at a very low density, with slightly higher abundances in six     locations (0.1animal/</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">). This is not necessarily indicative of     the     population size on Pedro Bank, however, as key </span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Strombus</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> habitats were     not examined. Lobsters were rarely observed on reefs, occurring at 12     sites at densities of 2lobster/100</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">); much higher numbers were seen in     landings examined on shore. Prominent <span style="font-style: italic;">Diadema     </span>populations occurred in     two locations (12-20/100</span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">); low densities (&lt;0.5/100</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">) in other     sites suggests they have shown limited recovery since the die-off in     the 1980s.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Drivers of community structure:     </span>With exception of a few sites, dominant taxa were similar in     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[size     structure and abundance, and the condition of the substrate and health     of corals showed minimal differences. Sites could be delineated into     three groups based on benthic attributes, with macroalgae, crustose     coralline algae (CCA) and non-living substrate contributing most to the     differences (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i8.jpg">Fig. 8</a>).     Sites also subdivided into eight groups based on     the contribution of different fish taxa to biomass, with groupings     differentiated mostly due to relative amounts of parrotfish,     surgeonfish and/or triggerfish. Most other variables were fairly     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[homogeneous between locations. For instance, coral cover, fish     abundance and biomass, and </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Diadema</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> abundance were uniformly     low among     all sites. Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM) testing did not reveal any     significant relationships between coral abundance and macroalgal cover     (R2=0.155, p=0.161); coral abundance was related to fish biomass (all     species pooled), but the R-value was very low (R2=0.249; p=0.006). Fish     abundance (all species pooled) was not related to coral cover     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(R2=0.011; p=0.444) or vertical relief (height between the substrate     and the tops of the corals; R2=0.059; p=0.778), but it was related to     macroalgal cover, although the R value again was low (R2=0.428;     p=0.013). Herbivorous fish populations (biomass and abundance of pooled     species, parrotfish and surgeonfish) did not appear to be related to     algae (CCA, fleshy macroalgae or turf algae) or coral (cover or     abundance) populations. The lack of identifiable drivers of community     structure may be due to the fact that all sites were overfished, coral     cover was uniformly low, and algal communities were fairly homogeneous.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-weight: bold;">Resilience and health of reefs:</span> The     sites examined in this study exhibited Reef Health Index (RHI) scores     that varied from 1-3 (critical to fair condition) for seven parameters     (coral cover, coral recruitment, coral disease, fleshy algae biomass,     herbivore abundance </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">(Diadema</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">, parrotfishes and     surgeonfishes), and     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[commercially important reef fish) and a cumulative RHI of 2 to 3.5     (<a href="/img/revistas/rbt/v62s3/a10i9.jpg">Fig. 9</a>).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">Discussion</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Pedro Bank is a     unique area that     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[supports a wide variety of shallow marine habitats including seagrass     beds, gorgonian hardgrounds, rubble fields, deep algal meadows, sand     flats and coral reefs. Coral reef habitats occupied only a small     percentage of the bank overall, and were mostly concentrated at the     eastern and southeastern edge of the bank, adjacent to the drop-off.     The new fishery reserve contains some of the healthiest coral reefs,     including extensive shallow </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Acropora     palmata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> framework and the largest     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[healthy stand of </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">A.     cervicorni</span>s</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> found on Pedro Bank. Other important     high relief coral habitats and seagrass beds were adjacent but outside     of the reserve boundaries and around Banner Rock, Blowers Rock and D     and C shoal.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">In all locations,     coral cover was     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[fairly low (&lt;20%) and dominated by small corals, especially early     colonizing species (</span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Agaricia</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> and Porites) as well as </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Siderastrea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">,     <span style="font-style: italic;">Diploria</span>, and <span      style="font-style: italic;">Meandrina</span>. Of note were several     populations of larger     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[massive framework corals such as </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (complex), as     well as stands of <span style="font-style: italic;">Madracis mirabilis</span>,     and numerous large <span style="font-style: italic;">Dendrogyra     colonies</span>. </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (complex), once the most important     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[frame builders in the Western Atlantic, has declined throughout its     range since the mid-1990s, primarily from recent bleaching events and     disease (white plague and yellow band disease) (Miller, Atkinson &amp;     Witcher, 2009; Bruckner, 2012a). These corals formerly made up 50-80%     of the live coral cover, but recently have been reduced to 2-5% cover;     what were once large (several meter) colonies are now skeletons     colonized by other corals, algae and invertebrates, with small </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">M. annularis</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> tissue remnants. On     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[Pedro Bank, most of the larger </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> and </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     faveolata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> colonies were completely &#8216;live&#8221;. Very     little     disease, bleaching and recent mortality was noted on these species.     Extensive </span></font><font size="2"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Acropora</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> framework with scattered     live colonies surrounded     many of the cays and emergent shoals, and small patches of </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">A. cervicorni</span>s</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> were found on many of     the deeper reefs (10-30m depth).     Acroporid corals have become rare in most Caribbean locations as a     result of white band disease outbreaks in the 1980s, recent bleaching     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[events, storm damage and a host of other factors and were recently     listed on the U.S. Endangered Species Act (Bruckner, 2003). The lack of     disease, few corallivores and presence of small colonies with little     mortality on Pedro Bank is indicative of ongoing recovery of these     species.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">One of the most     positive findings     among the stony corals examined on Pedro Bank was the low level of     partial mortality. AGRRA surveys that have been conducted throughout     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[the Caribbean over the last 15 years (Lang, 2003; Bruckner &amp; Hill,     2009; Bruckner, 2012b), as well as the Caribbean surveys completed     during the Global Reef Expedition, have recorded a mean of about 20-30%     partial mortality on all species pooled and upwards of 50-80% partial     mortality in </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> complex and other larger massive     corals. On     Pedro Bank most colonies were intact; partial mortality was usually     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[less than 10% and colonies of </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> (complex) showed about 20%     partial mortality. The presence of healthy, undamaged colonies may be     an indication of higher resilience, better environmental conditions and     a greater potential for successful reproduction, as corals have not     been reduced below the minimal size threshold necessary for     gametogenesis (Szmant-Froelich, 1985; Szmant, 1991).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The benthos also     appeared to be in     fairly good condition. Even though <span style="font-style: italic;">Diadema     </span>were rare in most locations,     and cover of macroalgae exceeded the cover of living coral, there was a     general impression that fleshy macroalgae was less abundant than that     reported from many other Caribbean localities (Lang 2003). The     substrate had a prominent cover of crustose coralline algae, with small     patches of erect coralline algae and some macroalgae, most of which     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[were concentrated at the margins of corals and not on open reef     substrates. Unlike other areas in the Caribbean, the reef was not being     smothered by thick mats of Dictyota, Microdictyon (completely absent)     and Lobophora (occurred in low abundances), only on a few corals showed     partial mortality, and cyanobacterial mats were rare.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The largest concern     to Pedro Bank     reefs is overexploitation of the fishery resources. Exploitation of     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[Pedro Bank began in the 1960s, but has progressively increased as the     densities of humans on the cays increased (Munro, 1983). Most fishing     effort is concentrated on the southeast (SE) portions of the bank, near     the cays, which is also the location of some of the best developed     coral reefs. As a result, the biomass of reef fish was lowest     surrounding the fishing village with higher biomass (mainly     invertivores) seen at distances of 20mi or further from the village.     This is probably related to the distance that a fisherman can     realistically travel from the fishing village. Fishers tend to go to     their farthest point (under ten miles in one day) and then work their     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[way back, fishing at different spots as they return (Meggs pers. comm.).</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Intensive fishing     pressure appears     to have affected most species as all reefs had a fairly low biomass of     fishes and many key species were extremely rare or absent. The current     targets of the fishery appeared to be two families of herbivores which     made up the bulk of the catch, scaridae and acanthuridae. Very few     schools of surgeonfish were documented and individuals were small     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[(5-15cm) and large-bodied scarids were infrequently seen. In addition,     the dominant parrotfish on these reefs (and in the catch) was the red     band parrotfish followed by stoplight parrotfish. While parrotfish were     still fairly abundant, both species were very small (most &lt;15cm).     These species were changing sex from initial phase (females) to     terminal phase (males) at a much smaller size than that seen     historically (TP fish of 10cm were fairly common). The smaller than     average size in sex change may be a survival mechanism that is a direct     outcome of high fishing pressure (Hawkins &amp; Roberts, 2003).     However, the decline in the average size of the population will cause a     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[disproportionate decline in the reproductive output, because there is     an exponential relationship between body length and egg production     (Bohnsack, 1990), which may have negative consequences on the long term     persistence of these fish.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Two main fishery     approaches are now     undertaken on Pedro Bank, trap (pot) fishing and spearfishing using     hookah (Aiken &amp; Kong, 2000; Gustavson, 2002). The Antillean z-traps     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[were observed on or adjacent (in sand) to coral reef habitats in many     of the sites we surveyed. Traps typically contained a very low biomass     of fish, but the fish consisted of a broad spectrum including     piscivores (small serranids, lutjanids, grunts, balistids,     pomacanthids), as well as herbivores (scarids), but surgeonfish were     the dominant species noted. These traps seemed to favor smaller species     and individuals (partially because no large fish remain), which may     contribute to growth overfishing. Further, the depletion of large     predatory fishes has triggered a shift from high value species to a     high diversity of lower value species, especially species that formerly     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[were considered non-target species and are important indicators of a     healthy reef system (e.g. butterflyfish, angelfish); this is suggestive     of ecosystem overfishing (Pauly, 1979). As traps have become less     economical, there has been expanded use of hookah, primarily targeting     parrotfish with incidental catch of other &#8220;large&#8221; fish and lobsters,     which may lead to Malthusian overfishing (Pauly, 1990). A continued     decline of herbivores will also cause ancillary damage as reef     substrates become monopolized by increasing amounts of fleshy algae,     reducing the area available for encrusting coralline algae, and     inhibiting coral settlement. Over the longer term, the reefs will be     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[less likely to resist future disturbances and their potential to     rebound may be reduced.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">At this time, the     overall condition     of Pedro Bank&#8217;s coral reefs remains far better than most reefs off     mainland Jamaica, but these reefs are at a tipping point. The     establishment of the South West Cay Special Fishery Conservation Area     is a key step forward in conservation of Pedro Bank&#8217;s coral reef     resources, as it will allow fish to grow larger, potentially producing     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[more offspring and spill over into adjacent fished areas. In particular     it can help increase the abundance and size of parrotfish which     represent the primary target of fishermen and concurrently species     responsible for one of the most important processed in maintaining     ecological balance, herbivory. The newly established, measuring 16.3     k</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">, is far too small to     adequately protect fishery resources as this     represents &lt;0.1% of the total area (9 247k</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">m<sup>2</sup></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">; Zenny, 2006) of Pedro     Bank. Furthermore, the increasing fishing effort and destructive types     of fishing are unsustainable and are likely to trigger deleterious     changes to the reefs. Additional conservation measures that emphasize     an expanded network of protected areas may help maintain and restore     Pedro banks precious coral reefs.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">Recommendations</span></font><br     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Significant benefits     could be     achieved by expanding the boundaries of the newly established Fishery     Reserve such that it encompasses extensive and healthiest high relief </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> dominated coral habitat     found to the south and west, and it     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[includes an adjacent large seagrass bed. Banner reef should be     considered a candidate site for an MPA as it contained the largest     number of different marine habitats including a very diverse shallow     water reef dominated by large <span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea     faveolata</span> and </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M.     annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">     colonies intermixed with extensive stands of </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-style: italic;">Porites </span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">porites</span>, </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">A. cervicorni</span>s</span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> patches, large colonies     of </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Dendrogyra cylindricus</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> and high     relief coral bommies in deeper sandy areas, extensive Acropora     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[framework, and an elongate ridge with steeply sloping sides, caves, and     ledges that provided considerable habitat for large crabs, lobsters,     octopus, groupers and other high value species. Banner reef also had     the largest population of </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Diadema</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> seen on Pedro Bank, the     highest     diversity of fish families, and a high biomass of fish composed of     schools of grunts, parrotfishes and surgeonfishes. Blowers Rock is also     another candidate MPA site. It had the largest high-relief </span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Acropora palmata</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> framework seen on Pedro     Bank with extensive patches of live </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">A.     palmata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">. A very unusual </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> dominated reef was also     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[identified     in 15-20m depth. This reef had unusually large (2-4m diameter/height)     and old </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> faveolata colonies, the     largest seen on the bank.     Because these areas are east (and upcurrent) of the inhabited Cays and     the Fish Sanctuary, the endangered corals that occur on these reefs     (</span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> and <span      style="font-style: italic;">Acropora</span>) could serve as seed stock     for other areas on     the bank to the west. They also provide considerable habitat for other     species as a result of their high relief. Finally, C Shoal and D Shoal     are additional candidates for inclusion in an MPA network. It had     extensive </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Acropora     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[palmata</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> framework with small stands of living </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">A. palmata</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> in shallow (2-5m depth)     areas and extensive diverse deeper     coral habitats composed of large </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">-dominated communities,     patches of </span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Acropora     cervicornis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span      style="font-family: verdana;"> and the only large stands of </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Madracis mirabilis</span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> and </span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">Porites </span></span></font><font     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span      style="font-style: italic;">porites </span></span></font><font      size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">seen in the region.</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="3"><span      style="font-family: verdana;">Acknowledgments</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">The data presented     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[in this     manuscript were collected during the fifth coral reef research mission     completed during the Global Reef Expedition (GRE). All research was     performed under a permit obtained from the National Environment and     Planning Agency (NEPA) (ref #18/27, 8 December, 2011). Financial     support for the surveys and the research vessel, M/Y Golden Shadow was     provided by His Royal Highness Prince Khaled bin Sultan. We are     grateful for the involvement of the Nature Conservancy, Jamaica, the     University of West Indies, the Ministry of Agriculture &amp; Fisheries,     the National Environment and Planning Agency; and Natural Resource     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[Management and Environmental Planning Department (NRMEP), Nova     Southeastern University, Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment, and     Reef Environmental Education Foundation. Special thanks to Judy Lang,     Ken Marks, David Grenda, Alex Dempsey, Llewyn Meggs, Nathalie Zenny and     Rachel D&#8217;Silva for their assistance with the coral, algae, fish and     invertebrate surveys.</span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;">     <br style="font-family: verdana;">     <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;"><font style="font-weight: bold;"      size="3"><span style="font-family: verdana;">References</span></font><br      style="font-family: verdana;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br style="font-family: verdana;">     <!-- ref --><div style="text-align: left;"><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">Aiken, K., &amp; Kong, G. A. (2000). The marine fisheries of Jamaica. <span  style="font-style: italic;">The ICLARM Quarterly, 23</span>, 29-35.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777476&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Bohnsack, J. A. (1990). <span style="font-style: italic;">The potential of marine fishery reserves for reef fish management in the US Southern Atlantic. </span>NOAA Tech. Memo NMFS-SEFC-261, Miami.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777477&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Bruckner, A.W. (2003). <span style="font-style: italic;">Proceedings of the Caribbean </span></span></font><font style="font-style: italic;"  size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Acropora</span></font><font  size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span  style="font-style: italic;"> workshop: potential application of the Endangered Species Act as a conservation strategy.</span> NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFSOPR-24.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777478&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Bruckner, A. (2012a). <span style="font-style: italic;">Factors contributing to the regional decline of&nbsp;</span></span></font><font  style="font-style: italic;" size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font  style="font-style: italic;" size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">Montastraea</span></font><font  style="font-style: italic;" size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font><font  style="font-style: italic;" size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"> annularis</span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;"> (complex).</span> Proc. 12th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Cairns 11B_1, Phase shifts and alternative states on coral reefs.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777479&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Bruckner, A. (2012b). Static measures of the resilience of Caribbean coral populations. <span  style="font-style: italic;">Revista de Biologia Tropical, 60</span>(Supl. 1), 39-57.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777480&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Bruckner, A. W., &amp; Hill, R. (2009). Ten years of change to coral communities off Mona and Desecheo Islands, Puerto Rico from disease and bleaching. <span  style="font-style: italic;">Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, 87</span>, 19-31.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777481&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Clarke, K., &amp; Gorley, R. N. (2006). <span style="font-style: italic;">PRIMER v6 - User Manual/Tutorial.</span> Plymouth: Primer-e Ltd.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777482&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Clarke, K., &amp; Warwick, R. (2001). <span style="font-style: italic;">Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. </span>Plymouth: Primer-e Ltd.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777483&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Espeut, P. (2006). <span  style="font-style: italic;">The Wild Frontier: Living and fishing on the Pedro Cays of Jamaica: a Socio-economic Assessment.</span> Kingston: The Nature Conservancy.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777484&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Gustavson, K. (2002). Economic production from the artisanal fisheries of Jamaica. <span  style="font-style: italic;">Fisheries Research, 57</span>, 103-115.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777485&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Hawkins, J. P., &amp; Roberts, C. M. (2003). Effects of fishing on sex-changing Caribbean parrotfishes. <span style="font-style: italic;">Biological Conservation, 115</span>, 213-216.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777486&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Hay, D. B. (2006). <span  style="font-style: italic;">Biological survey of the Pedro Cays</span>. Kingston: The Nature Conservancy.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777487&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">HRI. (2008). H<span  style="font-style: italic;">ealthy reefs for healthy people. A guide to indicators of reef health and social well-bieng in the Mesoamerican reef region. </span>Retrieved from www.healthyreefs.org.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777488&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Hughes, T. P. (1994). Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef. <span style="font-style: italic;">Science, 265</span>, 1547-1551.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777489&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Koslow, J. A., Hanley, F., &amp; Wicklund, R. (1988). Effects of fishing on reef fish communities at Pedro Bank and Port Royal Cays, Jamaica. <span  style="font-style: italic;">Marine Ecology Progress Series, 43</span>, 201-212.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777490&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Kramer, P. R. (2006). <span style="font-style: italic;">Pedro Bank Coral Reefs: Status of coral reef and reef fishes.</span> Report for the Nature Conservancy. Miami, FL: The Ocean Research and Education Foundation.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777491&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Lang, J. L. (2003). Status of coral reefs in the western Atlantic: results of initial surveys, Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGGRA) program. <span  style="font-style: italic;">Atoll Research Bulletin, 496</span>, 1- 630.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777492&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Miller, J., Atkinson, A., &amp; Witcher, B. (2009). Coral disease following massive bleaching in 2005 causes 60% decline in coral cover on reefs in the US Virgin Islands. <span style="font-style: italic;">Coral Reefs, 28</span>, 925-937.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777493&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Munro, J. L. (1983). Caribbean coral reef fishery resources. A second edition of &#8216;The Biology, ecology, exploitation and management of Caribbean reef fishes: scientific report of the ODA/UWI Fisheries Ecology Research Project, 1969-1973&#8217;. University of the West Indies, Jamaica. <span  style="font-style: italic;">ICLARM Studies Review, 7</span>, 1-276.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777494&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Nicholson, W., &amp; Hartsuijker, L. (1982). The State of the Fisheries Resources of the Pedro Bank and South Jamaica Shelf. <span style="font-style: italic;">FAO Fisheries Report, 278</span>, 215-254.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777495&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Pauly, D. (1979). Theory and management of tropical multispecies stocks: a review with emphasis on the Southeast Asian demersal fisheries. <span  style="font-style: italic;">ICLARM Studies Review, 1</span>,1-35.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777496&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Pauly, D. (1990). On Malthusian overfishing. Naga. <span style="font-style: italic;">ICLARM Quarterly, 13</span>(1), 3-4.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777497&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Szmant, A. M. (1991). Sexual reproduction by the Caribbean reef corals </span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea annularis</span></span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"> and </span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;"><span style="font-style: italic;">M. cavernosa</span></span></font><font size="2"><span  style="font-family: verdana;">. <span style="font-style: italic;">Marine Ecology Progress Series, 74</span>,13-25.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777498&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Szmant-Froelich, A. M. (1985). The effect of colony size on the reproductive ability of the Caribbean coral </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><span  style="font-style: italic;">Montastraea annularis</span></span></font><font  size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"> (Ellis and Solander). <span  style="font-style: italic;">Proc. 5th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Tahiti, 4</span>, 295-300.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777499&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --></span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <br style="font-family: verdana;"> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Zenny, N. (2006). <span  style="font-style: italic;">Technical Summary of the Jamaica Ecoregional Planning (JERP), Marine Analysis. Draft. </span>Kingston: The Nature Conservancy Jamaica Country Programme.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1777500&pid=S0034-7744201400070001000025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --></span></font>    <br> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"></span></font></div> <font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">    <br> </span></font><font size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;"><a  name="1"></a><a href="#2">1</a>. Khaled bin Sultan Living Oceans Foundation, 8181 Professional Place, Landover, MD 20785 USA, 301-577-1288; bruckner@lof.org</span></font><br  style="font-family: verdana;"> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     <div style="text-align: center;"><font style="font-weight: bold;"  size="2"><span style="font-family: verdana;">Received 04-IX-2013 Corrected 02-I-2014 Accepted 24-III-2014</span></font></div> <font style="font-weight: bold;" size="2"></font></div>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Aiken]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kong]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The marine fisheries of Jamaica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[The ICLARM Quarterly]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>29-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bohnsack]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The potential of marine fishery reserves for reef fish management in the US Southern Atlantic.]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Miami ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruckner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Proceedings of the Caribbean Acropora workshop: potential application of the Endangered Species Act as a conservation strategy.]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruckner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Factors contributing to the regional decline of Montastraea annularis (complex).]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruckner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Static measures of the resilience of Caribbean coral populations.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista de Biologia Tropical]]></source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>60</volume>
<numero>^s1</numero>
<issue>^s1</issue>
<supplement>1</supplement>
<page-range>39-57</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bruckner]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hill]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ten years of change to coral communities off Mona and Desecheo Islands, Puerto Rico from disease and bleaching]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Diseases of Aquatic Organisms]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>87</volume>
<page-range>19-31</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clarke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gorley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R. N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[PRIMER v6 - User Manual/Tutorial]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^ePlymouth Plymouth]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Primer-e Ltd]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Clarke]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Warwick]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Changes in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation]]></source>
<year>2001</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^ePlymouth Plymouth]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Primer-e Ltd]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Espeut]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The Wild Frontier: Living and fishing on the Pedro Cays of Jamaica: a Socio-economic Assessment]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eKingston Kingston]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Nature Conservancy]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gustavson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Economic production from the artisanal fisheries of Jamaica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Fisheries Research]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>57</volume>
<page-range>103-115</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hawkins]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Roberts]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of fishing on sex-changing Caribbean parrotfishes]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Biological Conservation]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>115</volume>
<page-range>213-216</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hay]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D. B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biological survey of the Pedro Cays.]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eKingston Kingston]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Nature Conservancy.]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<source><![CDATA[Healthy reefs for healthy people.: A guide to indicators of reef health and social well-bieng in the Mesoamerican reef region.]]></source>
<year>2008</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hughes]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T. P.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Catastrophes, phase shifts, and large scale degradation of a Caribbean coral reef]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Science]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>265</volume>
<page-range>1547-1551</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Koslow]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hanley]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Wicklund]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effects of fishing on reef fish communities at Pedro Bank and Port Royal Cays, Jamaica]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Marine Ecology Progress Series]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<volume>43</volume>
<page-range>201-212</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Kramer]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Pedro Bank Coral Reefs: Status of coral reef and reef fishes]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Miami^eFL FL]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Ocean Research and Education Foundation]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Status of coral reefs in the western Atlantic: results of initial surveys, Atlantic and Gulf Rapid Reef Assessment (AGGRA) program]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Atoll Research Bulletin]]></source>
<year>2003</year>
<volume>496</volume>
<page-range>1- 630</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Miller]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Atkinson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Witcher]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[B.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Coral disease following massive bleaching in 2005 causes 60% decline in coral cover on reefs in the US Virgin Islands]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Coral Reefs]]></source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>925-937</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Munro]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J. L]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Caribbean coral reef fishery resources]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[A second edition of &#8216;The Biology, ecology, exploitation and management of Caribbean reef fishes: scientific report of the ODA/UWI Fisheries Ecology Research Project, 1969-1973&#8217;]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<volume>7</volume>
<page-range>1-276</page-range><publisher-name><![CDATA[ICLARM Studies Review]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Nicholson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hartsuijker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The State of the Fisheries Resources of the Pedro Bank and South Jamaica Shelf]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[FAO Fisheries Report]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>278</volume>
<page-range>215-254</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pauly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Theory and management of tropical multispecies stocks: a review with emphasis on the Southeast Asian demersal fisheries]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ICLARM Studies Review]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<page-range>1-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Pauly]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On Malthusian overfishing. Naga.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[ICLARM Quarterly]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>13</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>3-4</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Szmant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Sexual reproduction by the Caribbean reef corals Montastraea annularis and M. cavernosa.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Marine Ecology Progress Series]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>74</volume>
<page-range>13-25</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Szmant-Froelich]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A. M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The effect of colony size on the reproductive ability of the Caribbean coral Montastraea annularis (Ellis and Solander)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Proc. 5th Int. Coral Reef Symp., Tahiti,]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>295-300</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zenny]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[N.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Technical Summary of the Jamaica Ecoregional Planning (JERP), Marine Analysis]]></source>
<year>2006</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[^eDraft. Kingston Draft. Kingston]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[The Nature Conservancy Jamaica Country Programme]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
