0034-77440034-7744S0034-77442012000300030Brasil000920120009201260313271334Reproduction of the non-native fish Lepomis gibbosus(Perciformes: Centrarchidae) in Brazil
Rangel E. Santos1*, Tayara P. Silva1, Igor V. Chehayeb1 & André L. B. de Magalhães1
Abstract ]]>
Minas Gerais is the fourth largest Brazilian state, and has an estimate of 354 native fish species. However, these fish species may be threatened, as this state has the highest rank of fish introductions reported for Brazil and South America. As one from the total of 85 non-native species detected, Lepomis gibbosus was introduced in the 60s to serve both as foragefish and to improve sport fishing. In this study, we evaluated the establishment of L. gibbosus in a shallow lake in the city of Ouro Preto, Doce River basin, state of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil. We collected fish with fishing rods every two months from March 2002-February 2003. Fragments of gonads from a total of 226 females and 226 males were obtained and processed following standard histological techniques; then 5-7μm thickness sections were taken and stained in hematoxylin-eosin. Besides, for each specimen, the biometric measurements included the standard length (SL) and body weight (BW); and the sex ratio was obtained. The reproductive cycle stages were confirmed by the distribution of oocytes and spermatogenic cells. The type of spawning was determined by the frequency distribution of the reproductive cycle stages and ovarian histology. Based on the microscopic characteristics of the gonads, the following stages of the reproductive cycle were determined: one=Rest, two=Mature, three=Spawned for females or Spent for males; males and females in reproduction were found throughout the study period. Post-spawned ovaries containing oocytes in stages one (initial perinucleolar), two (advanced perinucleolar), three (pre-vitellogenic), four (vitellogenic) and post-ovulatory follicles indicated fractionated-type spawning in this species. The smallest breeding male and female measured were 4.6 and 4.9cm standard length, respectively, suggesting stunting. The sex ratio did not vary between males and females along the year and bimonthly, being 1:1. Moreover, L. gibbosus appears to be at stage three of biological invasion: establishment through reproduction. We suggest to deliver information about “non-native species” through lectures in schools, colleges/ universities, NGOs, government and environmental agencies in the cities and villages, in order to try to prevent environmental degradation by the introduction of non-native fish such as L. gibbosus in the region. We also recommend high fines for redhanded, and the import ban of non-native fish species to the region.
Se analiza el establecimiento del pez introducido Lepomis gibbosus en una laguna natural de la ciudad de Ouro Preto, Cuenca del Rio Doce, provincia de Minas Gerais, región sureste de Brasil. Cada dos meses se realizaron muestreos con anzuelo y línea, entre marzo 2002-febrero 2003 y se capturaron 226 hembras y 226 machos. Se encontraron hembras y machos en actividad reproductiva durante todo el muestreo. Ovarios con signos de desove con oocitos de diferentes tallas y folículos post-ovulatorios indicaron la puesta parcial para L. gibbosus. La hembra y macho en reproducción más pequeños tenían entre 4.6cm y 4.9cm de longitud, que caracteriza el enanismo. La proporción sexual fue 1:1 y no presentó diferencias bimensuales ni anuales. De las cinco fases del proceso de bioinvasión, se confirmó que L. gibbosus se encuentra en la fase tres, llamada establecimiento a través de la reproducción. Se sugiere aclaración sobre la temática “especie foránea” para evitar la degradación del ambiente con la introducción de peces foráneos en la región.
Palabras clave:Lepomis gibbosus, invasiones biológicas, pez sol, biología reproductiva, Brasil.
The rate of fish introduction have rapidly increased in South America since the late 80s (Lima et al. 2010). The first period of introductions in Brazil began in the early 20th century, coinciding with the increase of fish farming (Latini et al. 2004). The second period occurred in the middle of the last century, when electric companies in the Southeast invested in induced breeding of fish, often non-native to basins where they were released (Alves et al. 2007). The increasing demand for pond fee-fishing (‘fish-and-pay’) in most populous regions (Fernandes et al. 2003) and the aquarium trade (Magalhães & Jacobi 2008) contributed to a third period of introductions, wich began at the end of the last century and is currently in progress (Vitule 2009).
Minas Gerais is the fourth largest Brazilian state, with an area of 586 528Km2 embracing 17 rainage basins (Alves et al. 2007), and an estimate of 354 native fish species (Vieira et al. 2009b). However, these fish species may be threatened, since Minas Gerais is at the top of the ranking of fish introductions in Brazil and in South America, with 85 non-native species detected (Magalhães 2010).
Lepomis gibbosus (Linnaeus 1758) is one of the 85 species of non-native fish found in inland waters of the state (is not found anywhere else in Brazil). This species is a centrarchid native to Canada and United States and was introduced in the city of Ouro Preto in the 60s to serve both as prey (‘foragefish’) to Micropterus salmoides (Lacépède 1802) and improve sport fishing in the region (Magalhães & Ratton 2005). It is also present in Venezuela and Chile (Welcomme 1988), but there is no data about its biology in these two countries.
Despite Minas Gerais has a high number of oviparous, non-native fishes, consistent studies about their reproductive biology are still incipient and restricted to few species, such as Cichla ocellaris (=C. kelberi Kullander & Ferreira 2006) (Magalhães et al. 1996, Normando et al. 2009) in the São Francisco River basin, Cichla piquiti Kullander & Ferreira 2006 in the Paranaíba River Basin (Vieira et al. 2009a), Plagioscion squamosissimus (Heckel 1840) (Godinho et al. 1997), C. cf. ocellaris (Schneider 1801), Cichla monoculus Spix & Agassiz 1831 in the Grande River basin (Gomiero & Braga 2004), and L. gibbosus in the Doce River basin (Magalhães & Ratton 2005).
Studies about the reproduction of oviparous fish outside their natural range provide the parameters for understanding their establishment in the invaded ecosystem. Thus, our aims in this paper were: i) to study the reproductive cycle and type of spawning; ii) to determine the minimum and maximum standard length and body weight; iii) to calculate the sex ratio; iv) to evaluate the actual phase of invasion of L. gibbosus in the region; and v) to suggest actions to prevent further fish introductions in the upper Doce River, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Materials and methods
Study site: The Gambá Lake is a permanent, natural lake formed in a rupestrian ferruginous field (‘canga’), with maximum depth of 3.3m and area of 6 700m2. The native fish fauna of the lake is represented by Gymnotus carapo Linnaeus 1758, Geophagus brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard 1824), Australoheros facetus (Jenyns 1842). Non-native species include Poecilia reticulata Peters 1859, Xiphophorus hellerii Heckel 1848, Tilapia rendalli (Boulenger 1897) and L. gibbosus(Costa 2003).
Fish samples: We collected a total of 226 females and 226 males of L. gibbosus every two months, from March 2002-February 2003, using fishing rod and line (fishing gear allowed in the site) in the Gambá Lake (20o43’51.11’’ S - 43o30’0.63’’ W), city of Ouro Preto, state of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil. The region is located in the headwaters of the Doce River (Magalhães & Ratton 2005). The fish were sorted by site collection, packed in plastic bags, fixed in 10% formalin, and subsequently transferred to 70% alcohol. Voucher specimen used in this study are deposited under their respective catalogue number (MCP28664) in the Museum of Science and Technology, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Histological methods and stages of the reproductive cycle: We also collected fragments of gonads (ovaries and testes) of specimens and fixed them in Bouin’s fluid for 12hours. Fragments were subjected to routine histological techniques as follows: embedding in paraffin, and staining in hematoxylin-eosin of 5-7μm thickness sections (Vazzoler 1996). Stages of the reproductive cycle were determined based on microscopic characteristics of the gonads. We determined spawning type by analyzing the frequency distribution of stages of the reproductive cycle and ovarian histology (Bazzoli 2003). After determining the stages of the reproductive cycle of L. gibbosus, we calculated the bimonthly absolute and relative frequencies of females and males.
Standard length, body weight and sex ratio: From each individual the following biometric data were taken in the laboratory: standard length (SL), given in cm and body weight (BW) in g. Besides, we determined the sex ratio from the bimonthly absolute frequency and the total number of males and females of L. gibbosus using a chi-square (χ2) test. We considered statistically significant differences when p<0.05. The analysis was performed using the Paleontological Statistics-Past (Hammer et al. 2009).
Results
Histological methods and stages of the reproductive cycle: Based on the microscopic characteristics of the gonads, the following stages of the reproductive cycle were determined: one=Rest, two=Mature, three=Spawned for females or Spent for males (Fig. 1).
Reproductive cycle and type of spawning: Males and females in reproduction (stages two and three) were found during all the sampling period (Fig. 2). The high frequency of females in stage two and three was associated with the histologic features of spawned ovaries containing oocytes in stages one (initial perinucleolar), two (advanced perinucleolar), three (pre-vitellogenic), four (vitellogenic) and postovulatory follicles, indicated that the species has a fractionated-type spawning.
]]>
Standard length, body weight and sex ratio: The smallest breeding female we found was at stage three (Spawned), measured 4.6cm SL and weighted 2g. The smallest breeding male we found was at stage two (Mature) and measured 4.9cm with a weight of 2g (Table 1).
We found no differences in the percentage frequencies between females and males of L. gibbosus for the whole study period (1:1, chisquare=0.00, p<0.05), except for September- October 2002, where we found more males than females (0.5:1, chi-square=5.12, p<0.05) (Table 2).
Discussion
We found females and ]]>
L. gibbosus in reproduction activity throughout the study period in the Gambá Lake. The same trend occurred with L. gibbosus introduced into a dam (Custódio’s Dam) 20km always from 2002 (Magalhães & Ratton 2005). The longer reproductive period in an introduced population of L. gibbosus out of South America was recorded in Greece and Spain, where the species ]]>
]]>
Females having oocytes at all developmental stages, with different sizes and asynchronous growth, along with post-ovulatory follicles, indicate that the species has a fractionated-type spawning. Fractionated spawning is characteristic of this species both in his native range (Scott & Crossman 1973), and in places where it is introduced, such as South America (Magalhães & Ratton 2005), Europe, and Asia (Copp & Fox 2007). Reproductive features of species may influence its probability of establishment (Latini & Petrere 2004). Species with ]]>
We found breeding males and females ]]>
L. gibbosus with less than 5cm SL and small body weight, which can indicate stunting. This phenomenon may be due to three reasons in the Gambá Lake: i) intraspecific competition due to overcrowding, ii) low food availability and iii) increased survival rate due to the absence of top predators (Roff 1992). This is perhaps the lowest measurement found in reproductively active, introduced populations of L. gibbosus. In France, Spain, England, Greece and Romania, the minimum size reproductive individuals of this species ranged from 5.1cm-9.1cm SL (Copp et al. ]]>
As expected, we ]]>
L. gibbosus in the majority of bimesters and in the whole study period. The same proportion of females and males was also found for the species introduced in England (Cucherousset et al. 2009). That is advantageous for the species in terms of reproduction, because as the male build the nest during the breeding season (Klarr et al. 2004), there will always be at least one female available to mate, thus ]]>
According to Lockwood et al. (2007), the process of invasion by a non-native species happens in five stages: i) transportation from their place of origin, ii) arrival of the species in the new environment, iii) establishing through reproduction, iv) expansion of its geographic range, v) impact (low or high), the moment when the receiving biota suffers consequences from ]]>
L. gibbosus is at stage three, since it is well adapted in the Gambá Lake, reproducing throughout the study period. This species have found in this habitat similar conditions to those of their places of origin, being considered as an established species. Moreover, this shallow lake has natural very low richness of native species such as G. carapo, G. brasiliensis and A. facetum and this may have been ]]>
L. gibbosus. These results agree with the statement of Moyle & Light (1996) that the magnitude of the impact of introduced species in a natural environment can increase according to the specific characteristics of the environment. Therefore, systems with few native species, such as headwater regions, tend to have low environmental resistance to invasion by non-native species than ecosystems with high species richness. ]]>
We suggest that an important tool to prevent further introductions of fish in the Upper Doce River environments will be the dissemination of scientific information about “nonnative species” through lectures in schools, colleges/universities, NGOs, government and environmental agencies in the cities and villages. Besides, to prevent the reproduction and dissemination of L. gibbosus and other species, the direction of ]]>
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the ]]>
References
Alves, C.B.M., F. Vieira, A.L.B. Magalhães & M.F.G. Brito. 2007. Impacts of non-native fish species in Minas Gerais, Brazil: present situation and prospects, p. 291-314. In T.M. Bert. Ecological and genetic implications of aquaculture activities. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. [ Links ]
Bazzoli, N. 2003. Parâmetros reprodutivos de peixes de interesse comercial do rio São Francisco na região de Pirapora, p. 285-300. In H.P. Godinho & A.L. Godinho (eds.). Águas, peixes e pesca no São Francisco das Minas Gerais. Editora PUC Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. [ Links ]
Copp, G.H., M.G. Fox & V. Kova´cˇ. 2002. Growth, morphology and life history traits of a cool-water European population of pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus. Arch. Hydrobiol. 155: 585-614. [ Links ]
Copp, G.H. & M.G. Fox. 2007. Growth and life history traits of introduced pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) in Europe, and the relevance to invasiveness potential, p. 289-306. In F. Gherardi. Freshwater bioinvaders: profiles, distribution, and threats. Springer, Berlin, Germany. [ Links ]
Costa, R.C. 2003. Estudo de comunidade de anfíbios anuros em uma lagoa urbana no município de Ouro Preto, MG. Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Minas Gerais, Brasil. [ Links ]
Cucherousset, J., G.H. Copp, M.G. Fox, E. Sterud, H.H. van Kleef, H. Verreycken & E. Záhorská. 2009. Lifehistory traits and potential invasiveness of introduced pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus populations in northwestern Europe. Biol. Inv. 11: 2171-2180. [ Links ]
Fernandes, R., L.C. Gomes & A.A. Agostinho. 2003. Pesque-pague: negócio ou fonte de dispersão de espécies exóticas? Acta Sci. Biol. Sci. 25: 115-120. [ Links ]
Godinho, H.P., G.B. Santos & E.C. Assis. 1997. Some aspects of the reproduction of female corvine fish Plagioscion squamosissimus Haeckel, 1840 (Sciaenidae) in a reservoir of southeastern Brazil. Trop. Fresh. Biol. 6: 17-26. [ Links ]
Gomiero, L.M. & F.M.S. Braga. 2004. Reproduction of species of the genus Cichla in a reservoir in southeastern Brazil. Braz. J. Biol. 64: 613-624. [ Links ]
Hammer, Ø., D.A.T. Harper & P.D. Ryan. 2009. Past: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis, version 1.12. Palaeontological Association, Aberystwyth, Wales (Downloaded: October 10, 2009, http://folk.uio.no/ohammer/past). [ Links ]
Klarr, M., G.H. Copp & R. Horsfield. 2004. Autumnal habitat use of non-native pumpkinseed Lepomis gibbosus and associations with native fish species in small English streams. Fol. Zool. 53: 189-202. [ Links ]
Latini, A.O., M. Jr. Petrere. 2004. Reduction of a native fish fauna by alien species: an example from Brazilian freshwater tropical lakes. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 11: 71-79. [ Links ]
Latini, A.O., D.P. Lima-Jr., H.C. Giacomini, R.O. Latini, D.C. Resende, H.M.V. Espírito-Santo, D.F. Barros & T.L. Pereira. 2004. Alien fishes in lakes of the Doce river basin (Brazil): range, new occurrences and conservation of native communities. Lundiana 5: 135-142. [ Links ]
Lima, F.P., A.O. Latini & P. de Marco. 2010. How are the lakes? Environmental perception by fishermen and alien fish dispersal in Brazilian tropical lakes. Interciencia 35: 84-91. [ Links ]
Lockwood, J.L., M.F. Hoopes & M.P. Marchetti. 2007. Invasion Ecology. Blackwell, Malden, Maryland, USA. [ Links ]
Magalhães, A.L.B., Y. Sato, E. Rizzo, R.M.A. Ferreira & N. Bazzoli. 1996. Ciclo reprodutivo do tucunaré Cichla ocellaris (Schneider, 1801) na represa de Três Marias, MG. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 48: 85-92. [ Links ]
Magalhães, A.L.B. & T.F. Ratton. 2005. Reproduction of a South American population of pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus (Linnaeus) (Osteichthyes, Centrarchidae): a comparison with the European and North American populations. Rev. Bras. Zool. 22: 477-483. [ Links ]
Magalhães, A.L.B. & C.M. Jacobi. 2008. Ornamental exotic fish introduced into Atlantic Forest water bodies, Brazil. Neotrop. Biol. Cons. 3: 73-77. [ Links ]
Magalhães, A.L.B. 2010. Efeitos da introdução de peixes ornamentais não-nativos em bacias higrográficas de Minas Gerais. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. [ Links ]
Moyle, P.B. & T. Light. 1996. Biological invasions of fresh water: empirical rules and assembly theory. Biol. Cons. 78: 149-162. [ Links ]
Neophytou, C. & A.J. Giapis. 1994. A study of the biology of pumpkinseed [Lepomis gibbosus (L.)] in Lake Kerkini (Greece). J. Appl. Ichthyol. 10: 123-133. [ Links ]
Nikolsky, G.V. 1963. The ecology of fishes. Academic, London, Great Britain. [ Links ]
Normando, F.T., F.P. Arantes, K.K. Luz, R.G. Thomé, E. Rizzo, Y. Sato & N. Bazzoli. 2009. Reproduction and fecundity of tucunaré Cichla kelberi (Perciformes: Cichlidae), an exotic species in Três Marias reservoir, southeastern Brazil. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 25: 1-7. [ Links ]
Roff, D.A. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories: Theory and Analysis. Chapman & Hall, New York, New York, USA. [ Links ]
Santos, E.P. 1978. Dinâmica de populações aplicada à pesca e piscicultura. Hucitec-Edusp, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil. [ Links ]
Scott, W.B. & E.J. Cromssman. 1973. Freshwater fishes of Canada. Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [ Links ] ]]>
Smith, B.B. & K.F. Walker. 2004. Spawning dynamics of common carp in the River Murray, South Australia, shown by macroscopic and histological staging of gonads. J. Fish Biol. 64: 336-354. [ Links ]
Vazzoler, A.E.A.M. 1996. Biologia da reprodução de peixes teleósteos: teoria e prática. Eduem, Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. [ Links ]
Vieira, A.B.C., L.F. Salvador-Jr., R.M.C. Melo, G.B. Santos & N. Bazzoli. 2009a. Reproductive biology of the peacock bass Cichla piquiti (Perciformes: Cichlidae), an exotic species in a Neotropical reservoir. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 7: 745-750. [ Links ]
Vieira, F., C.B.M. Alves & P.S. Pompeu. 2009b. Peixes, p. 181-219. In G.M. Drummond, C.S. Greco, M.B. Martins & F. Vieira (eds.). Biota Minas: Diagnóstico do conhecimento sobre a biodiversidade no estado de Minas Gerais Subsídio ao programa Biota Minas. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. [ Links ]
Vila-Gispert, A. & R. Moreno-Amich. 1998. Seasonal abundance and depth distribution of Blennius fluviatilis and introduced Lepomis gibbosus, in Lake Banyoles (Catalonia, Spain). Hydrobiology 386: 95-101. [ Links ]
Vitule, J.R.S. 2009. Introdução de peixes em ecossistemas continentais brasileiros: revisão, comentários e sugestões de ações contra o inimigo quase invisível. Neotrop. Biol. Cons. 4: 111-122. [ Links ]
Welcomme, R.L. 1988. International introductions of inland aquatic species. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 294: 1-318. [ Links ]
]]>
*Correspondencia Rangel E. Santos: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário UNA, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30.180- 100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. rangel_es@msn.com Tayara P. Silva: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário UNA, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30.180- 100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. tayaraps@hotmail.com Igor V. Chehayeb: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário UNA, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30.180- 100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. igorrpg@msn.com André L. B. de Magalhães: Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário UNA, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30.180- 100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. andrebiomagalhaes@gmail.com 1. Instituto de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Centro Universitário UNA, Rua Guajajaras, 175, Centro, CEP 30.180- 100, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil; rangel_es@msn.com, tayaraps@hotmail.com, igorrpg@msn.com, andrebiomagalhaes@gmail.com
Received 03-VIII-2011. Corrected 20-I-2012. Accepted 22-II-2012.
