*Dirección para correspondencia

---

]]> Abstract

In Egypt, Biomphalaria alexandrina is the intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni. The fates of Schistosoma miracidia in the snails varies between different species of ]]> Biomphalaria. The internal defense system is one of the factors that influence the susceptibility pattern of the snails. The interaction between Biomphalaria snails and S. mansoni needs to be identified for each species, and even between the members of the same species with different degrees of susceptibility. In the present study, the first generation of susceptible and resistant parents of B. alexandrina was ]]> B. alexandrina snails against S. mansoni. It was also designed to determine the impact of the resistance increase in parent snails, on the mechanisms of interaction of their offspring against infection. The results showed that the infection rate of the offspring from the susceptible parents was 92%. No susceptible offspring was produced from the resistant parents. When ]]>
A common feature of the resistant snails was the absence of any viable parasites. The tissue reactions of the resistant snails having only resistant parents occurred at the site of miracidial penetration. In resistant snails for which susceptible ]]> B. alexandrina snails against Schistosoma infection which was found to occur by two different mechanisms. One type of defense occurs in highly resistant snails, and employs direct miracidial destruction soon after parasite penetration. The other type occurs in less resistant snails where a delayed resistance development occurs after the dissemination of the sporocysts in the snail tissues. It seems that B. alexandrina snails respond more or less similar to B. glabrata. The results also proved that the immune response of the internal defense system increased with increasing the number of the inherited resistant genes.

Key words: Biomphalaria ]]> , Schistosoma mansoni, susceptible, resistant, immune response, hemocyte, histopathology.

Resumen

En Egipto, Biomphalaria alexandrina es el huésped intermediario de Schistosoma mansoni. La supervivencia de los miracidios de Schistosoma en los caracoles varía entre las especies de Biomphalaria. El sistema de defensa interno es uno de los factores que influyen en el patrón de susceptibilidad de los caracoles. La interacción entre los caracoles Biomphalaria y S. mansoni requiere ser identificada para cada especie e incluso, entre los miembros de la misma especie con diferente grado de susceptibilidad.
En el presente estudio, la primera generación de padres susceptibles y resistentes de B. alejandrina fue examinada histológicamente al día ]]> B. alejandrina contra S. mansoni. También, el estudio se diseñó para determinar el impacto en el aumento de la resistencia en los caracoles padres, en los mecanismos de interacción de sus crías contra la infección. Los ]]>
Los resultados caracterizaron la respuesta inmune de los caracoles B. alexandrina contra la infección por Schistosoma, ]]> B. alexandrina responden de una manera más o menos similar a B. ]]> . Los resultados también demostraron que la respuesta inmune del sistema de defensa interna aumentó cuando en el número de genes de resistencia heredados es mayor.

Palabras clave: Biomphalaria alexandrina, Schistosoma ]]> , susceptibilidad, resistencia, respuesta inmune, hemocitos, histopatología.

---

Biomphalaria alexandrina is the common aquatic snails that serve as an intermediate host for Schistosoma mansoni in Egypt. ]]> Schistosoma miracidia that penetrate different species of Biomphalaria vary from destruction within hours to productive infections that yield human-infective cercariae several weeks later. To understand the mechanisms used by the resistant snails to destroy the parasites, or those used by the parasites to ensure their survival in their suitable hosts, one must comprehend the internal defense  mechanisms that are available to the host (Bayne 2009). The internal defense system (IDS) is one of the ]]> et al. 2010). Its main action is mediatedby the phagocytic hemocytes in cooperation with humoral components (Negrão-Corrêa et al. 2007). The interaction between S. mansoni and the IDS of the snail suggests that the hemocytes  could be the main effecter element in the destruction ]]> et al. 1995). However, the parasite can escape the IDS by two mechanisms, molecular mimicry and antigenic masking. In the molecular mimicry, the parasite expresses glycoprotein epitopes on its surface that mimic host molecules, while the antigenic masking is the absorption and incorporation of the snail agglutinins and hemolymph soluble components ]]>

Understanding the host-parasite interactions represents a major challenge in biology and may help in finding a novel control method against Schistosoma in different snail species. Differences in the immune responses were represented by different species of Biomphalaria  ]]> Schistosoma infection and even between members of the same species with different degrees of susceptibility (de Souza et al. 1997, Borges et al. 1998). So, the mechanisms involved in these interactions need to be specified for each species.

The outcome of the interplay ]]> Biomphalaria snail defense system and the invading Schistosoma parasite is determined by the level of concordance of the genetically determined characters (Basch 1976). Classical genetics showed, unsurprisingly, that the genotypes of both partners determine the outcome of each infection (Basch 1976, Abou El Naga et al. 2010). The present work was designed to determine the impact of increasing the resistance of B. alexandrina parent snails on the mechanisms of ]]> S. mansoni infection. This will help with the characterization of the immune response of B. alexandrina species against S. mansoni infection.

Material and Methods

The S. mansoni cycle was propagated at the laboratory of the Parasitology department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, between B. alexandrina snails and Swiss strain albino mice. Initially, the snails were collected from the water channels at Alexandria Governorate, and the miracidia of S. mansoni ]]>

The miracidia were collected from S. mansoni eggs obtained from the liver of infected mice, seven-eight weeks post infection (El-Gindy et al. 1985). The eggs were exposed to direct sunlight for approximately 30min to stimulate miracidial ]]>

A total of 200 juvenile snails at the age of two months, and the size of 3-4mm in diameter were challenged by exposure of each snail to ten active miracidia for 4-5hr, at day light and at room temperature (Henning & Youssef 1976). Groups of 25 snails were transferred to separate containers, each contained 2.5L of dechlorinated tap water (DTW). They were kept in the darkness at 26ºC for about four weeks. Fresh lettuce leaves were ]]>

The live exposed snails were examined microscopically every week for the presence of the larval stages of S. mansoni during four weeks. 30 days post infection; the snails were checked individually for the cercarial shedding (McClelland ]]>

To obtain the first generation (F1), 45 susceptible and 45 resistant snails were crossed in different proportions, to get the three experimental groups, as follows: Group I: ]]>
Those of group III were reared in beakers; each containing one susceptible and one resistant snail. Each aquarium and beaker contained DTW and pieces of foam that served as the substratum for the egg deposition. To avoid fertilized eggs before the beginning of the experiment, we discarded egg batches from each of the ]]> et al. 1989).

A total of 100 F1 ]]> S. mansoni miracidia. This study included the end of the experiment from each group. Susceptibility/resistance was determined as mentioned before.

Light microscopic study: Five susceptible and five resistant snails form each group, if present, together with the three uninfected snails were subjected to histological examination. They were relaxed with methanol crystals (approximately 2x10-4M), separately crushed between two microscope slides, and then the broken shell was pulled away from the body. The columellar muscle was separated from the shell, and the snail was extracted intact. The snails were fixed in Bouin’s fixative for at least 24hr and then placed in gradually increasing concentrations of ethanol. Hematoxyline and Eosin stained 5μm sections that were examined ]]>

Ethical approval: All animal studies presented here have been approved by the local government based on national regulations for animal experimentation.

]]> Results

All the snails that showed larval developmental stages of S. mansoni during the microscopic inspection shed cercariae at the 30th day post exposure. No delay in the larval migration was observed. Table ]]> shows the infection rate of the first generation (F1) of the different studied groups infected with ten S. mansoni miracidia. The infection rate of the offspring from the susceptible parents was 92%. No susceptible offspring was produced from the resistant parents. When the parents originated on equal numbers of susceptible and resistant snails, they gave an offspring with an infection rate of 20%.

Histopathological ]]> Table 2): The infected susceptible F1 generation that had susceptible parent snails (Group I) showed a high degree of susceptibility. Large numbers of live parasites were present with normal development (Fig. 1). The parasites were widely spread in different organs specially the digestive glands and ovotestis. No cellular reaction was present around ]]>
Susceptible offspring from susceptible and resistant parents (group III) showed parasites in different organs. A large number of them were able to complete their development although some dead ones were present surrounded by cellular infiltration. Moderate generalized diffuse cellular infiltration was present in the tissues and in between the organs. Sometimes granulomata were formed around the remnant of the parasites. These granulomata were spherical to oval in sections and appear in two forms in H&E stained slides. The first consisted of hemocytes and fibers encircling the dead parasite while the other form consisted of layers of flattened hemocytes and fibers encircling the dead parasite and surrounded by layers of unflattened hemocytes (Fig. 2, 3).

Histopathological findings of the infected F1 offspring failed to shed cercariae at the 30th day post exposure (Table 2): A common feature of these snails was the absence of viable only (Group II) contained very few numbers of dead parasites and granulomata. These snails showed an intense diffuse hemocytic reaction at the penetrating sites of miracidia (Fig. 4). Loose hemocyte rich nodules were detected in the cephalopodal tissues (Fig. 5).

Dead parasites were present in the resistant infected F1 snails that had parents from the other groups (Group I and Group III). The most common type of the dead parasites ]]> Fig. 6).

Hemocyte ]]> Fig. 7). The control non infected snails from different groups showed normal histology.

Discussion

The present work is a comparative histopathological study verifying the tissue reactions of B. alexandrina snails with different degrees of resistance against the development of S. mansoni. The studied snails were the offspring of ]]>

The number of the susceptible and the resistant F1 progeny in table 1 showed that in B. alexandrina, the susceptibility/resistance to S. mansoni is inherited as shown in ]]> Biomphalaria species (Lewis et al. 2003, Rosa et al 2005, Abou El Naga et al. 2010)

In this study, histopathological examination of the  susceptible offspring having only susceptible parents showed a normal development of the parasites with wide spread ]]> This was presented by the cellular infiltration surrounding the living parasites, and by the formation of the granuloma around some dead parasites. In spite of the presence of ]]> B. alexandrina snails and those of other species were not able to clear the infection (de Souza et al. 1997, El-Assal et al. 2001, Soomro et al. 2005). Parasitological studies of different Biomphalaria species showed that within the same species a smaller number of cercariae was shed from the susceptible ]]> et al 2005, Abou El Naga et al. 2010). These parasitological results could be explained by the previous immune reactions in the snail tissues.

Our results also ]]> et al. 1994).

The resistant snails showed many forms of  tissue reactions against the parasite, including diffuse ]]> et al. (1986) found that parasite-amebocyte contact occurred and led to phagocytosis and by 48hr only scattered remnants of sporocysts remained.
]]>
The two types of granulomata formed in the present study around the dead parasites were described by Lie & Heyneman (1976) as type 1 and type 2 granulomata. Basch (1975) attributed this variability to the individual difference in both the host and the parasite. Both types of granulomata appeared in the routinely stained slides as a mixture of hemocytes and fibers. In snails, the participation of the extracellular tissue in the granulomatous lesions is controversial (Yoshino 1976, Krupa et al. 1977). Borges & Andrade (2003) found that the hemocytes in the granuloma had expanded cytoplasmic processes that gave the appearance under light microscope as containing fibers.

The hemocyte rich nodules are another form of tissue reactions detected in the present study, mainly in the resistant snails and occasionally in the susceptible ones. They ]]> B. glabrata and B. tenagophila (Godoy et al. 1997, Borges et al. 1998, Negrão-Corrêa et al. 2007). After doing experiments with different snail crosses, Lewis et al. (2001) suggested that a single ]]>

By observing the tissue reactions of B.  alexandrina snails in this study, we can suggest that the immune responses occurred by two different mechanisms. One type of defense employs direct miracidial destruction soon after penetration of ]]> B. tenagophila Taim strain, a diffuse and focal hemocytic infiltration were observed in the cephalopodal tissue of the infected highly resistant snails and were found to be associated with rapid parasite destruction after penetration (Negrão-Corrêa et al. 2007).

The other type of the immune reactions occurred in the resistant snails in which their parents included susceptible snails. Their histopathological examination showed that the diffuse cellular infiltration, the hemocyte rich nodules and the focal thickening of the stroma were present in the deep tissues. Godoy et al. (1997) and Borges et al. (1998) considered these reactions as a delayed development of resistance that occurred after dissemination of sporocysts in the snail tissues. They considered this type of delayed developed resistance represents an alternative kind of host defense mechanism against S. mansoni miracidia. It occurs in spite of the evidence suggesting that S. mansoni sporocysts can sometimes develop their ability, in a ]]> et al. 1980).

It was found that when B. tenagophila and B. straminea were exposed to S. mansoni they utilized ]]> et al. 1997, Grassi et al.  2001, Negrão-Corrêa et al. 2007). On the other hand, B. glabrata which is more susceptible to S. mansoni ]]> et al. 1997). However, when B. glabrata was challenged by an incompatible strain of S. mansoni, the parasites were immediately recognized and killed, mainly by the strong phagocytic activity of the cells (Lie et al. 1980, Roger et al. 2008).
]]>
Our results characterized the immune response, as expressed by the tissue reactions, of susceptible and resistant B. alexandrina snails against the exposure to S. mansoni. It seems that B. alexandrina snails respond more or less similar to B. ]]> . Moreover, the present work is designed to determine the impact of increasing the resistance of the parent snails on the mechanisms of interaction of their offspring against B. alexandrina S. mansoni exposure. The results proved that the immune response of the IDS increased with increasing the number of the inherited resistant genes.

Acknowledgments
Thanks to Samia Ibrahim, for her technical assistance in the snail rearing.

---

References

Abou El Naga, I.F., M.M. Eissa, S.F. Mossallam & S.I. Abd El-Halim. 2010. Inheritance of Schistosoma mansoni infection incompatibility in Biomphalaria alexandrina snails. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 105: 149-154.         [ Links ]

Basch, P.F. 1975. An interpretation of snail-trematode infection rates: specificity based on concordance of compatible phenotypes. Int. J. Parasitol. 5: 449-452.         [ Links ]

Basch, P.F. 1976. Intermediate host specificity in Schistosoma mansoni. Exp. Parasitol. 39: 150-169.         [ Links ]

Bayne, C.J. 1990. Phagocytosis and non-self recognition in invertebrates. BioScience 40: 723-731.         [ Links ]

Bayne, C.J. 2009. Successful parasitism of vector snail Biomphalaria glabrata by the human blood fluke (trematode) Schistosoma mansoni: A 2009 assessment. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 165: 8-18.         [ Links ]

Borges, C.M. & Z.A. Andrade. 2003. Extra-cellular matrix changes in Schistosoma mansoni-infected Biomphalaria glabrata. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 98: 135-139.         [ Links ]

Borges, C.M., C.P. de Souza & Z.A. Andrade. 1998. Histopathologic features associated with susceptibility and resistance of Biomphalaria snails to infection with Schistosoma mansoni. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 93: 117-121.         [ Links ]

Connors, V.A., I. de Buron & W.O. Granath Jr. 1995. Schistosoma mansoni: interleukin-1 increases phagocytosis and superoxide production by hemocytes and decreases output of cercariae in schistosome-susceptible Biomphalaria glabrata. Exp. Parasitol. 80: 139-148.         [ Links ]

Cooper, L., C. Richards, F. Lewis & D. Minchella. 1994. Schistosoma mansoni: relation between low fecundity and reduced susceptibility to parasite infection in the snail, Biomphalaria glabrata. Exp. Parasitol. 79: 21-28.         [ Links ]

de Souza, C.P., C.C. Borges, A.G. Santana & Z.A. Andrade. 1997. Comparative histopathology of Biomphalaria glabrata, B. tenagophila and B. straminea with variable degrees of resistance to Schistosoma mansoni miracidia. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 92: 517-522.         [ Links ]

Dettman, C.D., S.B. Higgins-Opitz & A. Saikoolal. 1989. Enhanced efficacy of paddling method for schistosoma infection of rodents by a four-step pre-soaking procedure. Parasitol. Res. 76: 183-184.         [ Links ]

El-Assal, F.M., N.M. Shoukry, M.H. Abdalla & A.H. Saad. 2001. Cellular response to Schistosoma mansoni infection in Biomphalaria alexandrina strains selected for susceptibility and resistance. J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol. 31: 915-938.         [ Links ]

El-Gindy, M.S., M.S. Arafa, M.K. Makled, M.M. Ismail, M.M. Elridi, M.M. Atia & R.L. el-Gamal. 1985. Effect of some factors upon the susceptibility of Biomphalaria alexandrina to infection with Schistosoma mansoni. J. Egypt Soc. Parasitol. 15: 231-235.         [ Links ]

Godoy, A., C.P. de Souza, C.T. Guimarães & Z.A. Andrade. 1997. Unusual histological findings in Biomphalaria glabrata with high degree of resistance to Schistosoma mansoni miracidia. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 92: 121-122.         [ Links ]

Grassi, L., M. Torres Jordá, Z. Andrade & S.M. González- -Cappa. 2001. Short report: Schistosoma mansoni miracidia are killed by the defense system of an Argentine strain of Biomphalaria straminea. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65: 290-292.         [ Links ]

Henning, J. & G. Youssef. 1976. Influence of diet on breeding and infectivity in mass cultivation of Biomphalaria glabrata. Egypt J. Bilharz. 3: 45-55.         [ Links ]

Krupa, P.L., L.M. Lewis & P. Del Vecchio. 1977. Schistosoma haematobium in Bulinus guernei: electron microscopy of hemocyte-sporocyst Interactions. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 30: 35-45.         [ Links ]

Lewis, F.A., C.N. Patterson & C. Grzywacz. 2003. Parasite- susceptibility phenotypes of F1 Biomphalaria glabrata progeny derived from interbreeding Schistosoma mansoni-resistant and -susceptible snails. Parasitol. Res. 89: 98-101.         [ Links ]

Lewis, F.A., C.N. Patterson, M. Knight & C.S. Richards. 2001. The relationship between Schistosoma mansoni and Biomphalaria glabrata: genetic and molecular approaches. Parasitology 123: 169-179.         [ Links ]

Lie, K.J. & D. Heyneman. 1976. Studies on resistance in snails. 3. Tissue reactions to Echinostoma lindoense sporocysts in sensitized and resensitized Biomphalaria glabrata. J. Parasitol. 2: 51-58.         [ Links ]

Lie, K.J., K.H. Jeong & D. Heyneman. 1980. Tissue reaction induced by Schistosoma mansoni in Biomphalaria glabrata. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 78: 157-166.         [ Links ]

Loker, E.S., C.J. Bayne & M.A. Yui. 1986. Echinostoma paraensei: hemocytes of Biomphalaria glabrata as targets of Echinostoma mediate interference with host snails resistance to Schistosoma mansoni. Exp. Parasitol. 62: 149-154.         [ Links ]

McClelland, W.J. 1965. The production of cercariae by Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma haematobium and methods for estimating the numbers of cercariae in suspension. Bull. World Health Organ 3: 270-276.         [ Links ]

Negrão-Corrêa, D., C.A.J. Pereira, F.M. Rosa, R.L. Martins- Souza, Z.A. Andrade & P.M.Z. Coelho. 2007. Molluscan response to parasite: Biomphalaria and Schistosoma mansoni interaction. J. Invert. Survival 4: 101-111.         [ Links ]

Newton, W.L. 1952. The comparative tissue reaction of two strains of Australorbis glabratus to infection with Schistosoma mansoni. J. Parasitol. 38: 362-366.         [ Links ]

Roger, E., G. Mitta, Y. Moné, A. Bouchut, A. Rognon, C. Grunau, J. Boissier, A. Théron & B.E. Gourbal. 2008. Molecular determinants of compatibility polymorphism in the Biomphalaria glabrata/Schistosoma mansoni model: New candidates identified by a global comparative proteomics approach. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 157: 205-216.         [ Links ]

Rosa, F.M., A.L. Godard, V. Azevedo & P.M. Coelho. 2005. Biomphalaria tenagophila: dominant character of the resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in descendants of crossbreedings between resistant (Taim, RS) and susceptible (Joinville, SC) strains. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 100: 19-23.         [ Links ]

Smithers, S.R. & R.J. Terry. 1965. The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of the adult worms. Parasitology 55: 695-700.         [ Links ]

Soomro, N.M., A.G. Arijo, T.A. Qureshi, N.W. Runham & M.J. Doenhoff. 2005. Pathology of Schistosome infection on host tissue during developmental stages of parasite in vector snails. Int. J. Agri. Biol. 7: 133-141.         [ Links ]

Thompson, R.C. 2001. Molecular mimicry in schistosomes. Trends Parasitol. 17: 168.         [ Links ]

Van der Knaap, W.P. & E.S. Loker. 1990. Immune mechanisms in trematode-snail interactions. Parasitol. Today 6: 175-182.         [ Links ]

Vasquez, R.E. & J.T. Sullivan. 2001. Effect of miracidial dose on adoptively transferred resistance to Schistosoma mansoni in the snail intermediate host, Biomphalaria glabrata. J. Parasitol. 87: 460-462.         [ Links ]

Yoshino, T.P. 1976. Encapsulation response of the marine prosobranch Cerithidea californica to natural infections of Renicola buchanani sporocysts (Trematoda: Renicolidae). Int. J. Parasitol. 6: 423-431.         [ Links ]

Zahoor, Z., A.J. Davies, R.S. Kirk, D. Rollinson & A.J. Walker. 2010. Larval excretory-secretory products from the parasite Schistosoma mansoni modulate HSP70 protein expression in defence cells of its snail host, Biomphalaria glabrata. Cell Stress Chaperones 15: 639-650.         [ Links ]

*Correspondencia:
Iman F. Abou-El-Naga: Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt. imanabouelnaga@hotmail.com
Eman H. Radwan: Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Damnhour University, Egypt. dr_emanhashem@yahoo.com
1. Medical Parasitology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Egypt; imanabouelnaga@hotmail.com
2. Zoology Department, Faculty of Science, Damnhour University, Egypt; dr_emanhashem@yahoo.com

---