<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0034-7744</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Revista de Biología Tropical]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Rev. biol. trop]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0034-7744</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Costa Rica]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0034-77442008000300022</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional response of the predatory mite Chileseius camposi (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on densities of it prey, Panonychus ulmi (Acarina: Tetranychidae)]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sepúlveda]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Francisco]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Carrillo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidad Austral de Chile Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Valdivia ]]></addr-line>
<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2008</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>56</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<fpage>1255</fpage>
<lpage>1260</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0034-77442008000300022&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0034-77442008000300022&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0034-77442008000300022&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The functional response of the phytoseiid predator Chileseius camposi González y Schuster, 1962 (Acarina:Phytoseiidae) on densities of its prey Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836) was evaluated under controlled temperature (20 ± 2 ºC),, relative humidity (75 ± 15%) and photoperiod (16:8h L:D). A functional type II response was displayed (Holling’s disk). Holling, Wolf transformation and Rogers models gave similar values for estimating parameters of the Holling’s disk equation; however, estimates produced by the Livdahl and Stiven model were higher. Values of attack rate and handling time can be considered within the normal range for phytoseiid generalists. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56 (3): 1255-1260. Epub 2008 September 30.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="es"><p><![CDATA[La respuesta funcional del ácaro fitoseido nativo Chileseius camposi González y Schuster, 1962, sobre el ácaro fitófago introducido Panonychus ulmi (Koch, 1836) (Acarina:Tetranychidae) fue evaluada en condiciones controladas de temperatura (20 ± 2 ºC), humedad relativa (75 ± 15%) y fotoperíodo (16:8 h L:O). Una respuesta funcional de tipo II, fue determinada (disco de Holling). Los modelos de Holling, Wolf y Rogers dieron valores similares para la estimación de los parámetros de la ecuación del disco de Holling, la estimación de estos parámetros por el modelo de Livdahl y Stiven fueron mayores. Los valores encontrados para la razón de ataque y el tiempo de manipulación pueden ser considerados dentro del ámbito normal para fitoseidos generalistas.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Chilesius camposi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Panonychus ulmi]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[predation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[functional response]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Phytoseiidae]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Chilesius camposi]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="4"><b>Functional response of the predatory mite </b><i>Chileseius camposi </i><b>(Acarina: Phytoseiidae) on densities of it prey, </b><i>Panonychus ulmi </i><b>(Acarina: Tetranychidae)</b></font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Francisco Sepúlveda<sup>1 </sup>&amp; Roberto Carrillo<sup>1 </sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">1. Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal, Universidad Austral de Chile,Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile; <a href="mailto:rcarrill@uach.cl">rcarrill@uach.cl</a></font></p> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Abstract: </b>The functional response of the phytoseiid predator <i>Chileseius camposi </i>González y Schuster, 1962 (Acarina:Phytoseiidae) on densities of its prey <i>Panonychus ulmi </i>(Koch, 1836) was evaluated under controlled temperature (20 ± 2 ºC),, relative humidity (75 ± 15%) and photoperiod (16:8h L:D). A functional type II response was displayed (Holling’s disk). Holling, Wolf transformation and Rogers models gave similar values for estimating parameters of the Holling’s disk equation; however, estimates produced by the Livdahl and Stiven model were higher. Values of attack rate and handling time can be considered within the normal range for phytoseiid generalists. Rev. Biol. Trop. 56 (3): 1255-1260. Epub 2008 September 30. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Key words: </b><i>Chilesius camposi, Panonychus ulmi, </i>predation, functional response, Phytoseiidae<sup>.</sup></font></p> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><sup> </sup></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i>Chilesius camposi </i>González y Schuster is a dominant phytoseiid mite associated in sympatry with the European red mite <i>Panonychus ulmi </i>(Koch) on apple tree <i>Malus sylvestris </i>Mill., in southern Chile (Venegas 1977, Guajardo 1993). <i>P. ulmi </i>is the most serious pest of apple and other deciduos fruit trees in Chile (Klein and Waterhouse 2000). A review of its biology, pest status and the impact of pesticides on population dynamics are given by Van de Vrie <i>et al</i>. (1972). </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Functional response, as described by Solomon (1949), is the change in prey number killed per individual predator per unit of time, as function of changes in prey density. Holling (1959a, 1959b, 1961) proposed three general types of functional response curves: (1) describes a linear rise in prey consumption to a plateau (type I), (2) cyrtoid curve rise at an increasing rate to a plateau (type II), (3) a sigmoid curve with a positive accelerating rate up to the inflection point and thereafter a diminishing rate up to the plateau (type III). Mori and Chant (1966) proposed a type IV, due they found a dome-shaped response resulting from confusing or inhibiting behavior of a timid predator and the consequent lower rate of attack at high prey densities.     <br> </font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The functional response is one of the most important aspects in the dynamics of a predator-prey relationship, and is a major component of population models (Berryman 1992). It has been used to predict mechanisms underlying predator-prey behavior to improve the practical predictive potential of predator candidates for biological control. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The type II functional response is described by two parameters <i>a </i>(attack rate) and <i>Th </i>(handling time). Thus, accurate parameter estimation becomes a prerequisite to make comparisons consequently, the method of parameter estimation has become a very important and controversial subject. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Therefore, the purposes of this research were to determine the functional response of adult <i>C. camposi </i>to varying densities of adult female <i>P. ulmi </i>under laboratory conditions and to compare different models to estimate <i>a </i>and <i>Th. </i></font></p>     <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="3">Materials and methods</font></b></p> <b><font face="Verdana" size="3"><i> </i></font></b>     <p><i><font face="Verdana" size="2">C. camposi </font></i><font  face="Verdana" size="2">and <i>P. ulmi</i>, phytoseiid and tetranychid mites respectively, used in functional response experiments were collected from apple leaves in Valdivia (39º47’S, 73º13’W) Xª Región de Los Lagos, Chile. Leaves were cut from apple trees on February 4<sup>th </sup>and 28<sup>th, </sup>2002. These leaves were taken to the laboratory in large plastic boxes (30 x 20 cm) and mites were examined under a dissection microscope. Excess leaves with mites were stored in plastic boxes at 15 ºC.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The experimental arena for this research consisted of excised pieces of apple leaf (diameter 2 cm) placed underside up, on a Petri dish (diameter 3.5cm) on a water film. To determine the functional responses of the adult stage, <i>C. camposi </i>was confined singly on experimental arenas with initial prey densities of 1, 5, 10, 20, 30 and 50 per plot. <i>C camposi</i>, is unable to consume spider mite eggs. Each predator was starved for 24 hours before tests. The number of prey killed per individual predator was recorded after 24 h exposure. The entire experiment was conducted under controlled temperature (20 ± 2 ºC), relative humidity (75±15%) and photoperiod at 16:8h (L:D), respectively. There were 25 replicates per density. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">To establish the validity of the outcomes and for comparative purposes, the following curve fitting models were used to estimate the functional response parameters, attack rate coefficient (<i>a) </i>and the handling time (<i>T</i>h) of <i>C camposi </i>preying on European red mite adult female. Sexed female mites were used as prey, to reduce the effect that differential weight of prey should have on the attack rate and handling time of the predator, since different factors may affect the handling time of natural enemies e.g. the speed of predator and prey, the size of the prey and time subduing. a prey (Hassell 1978) Unfortunately was not possible to sex <i>C. camposi, </i>to reduce the possible predator differential attack rate and handling time between males and females.    <br> </font></p>     <div style="text-align: center;"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><img  src="/img/revistas/rbt/v56n3/art22i2.jpg" title="" alt=""  style="width: 302px; height: 385px;"></font>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> </div>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i> </i></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><i>N<sub>a</sub> </i>defines the number of individual prey attacked per predator per time unit, <i>N </i>is the original number of prey items offered to each predator at the beginning of the experiment, <i>a’ </i>is the rate of successful attack of prey by a predator, <i>T<sub>t </sub></i>is the total time of exposure(24 h in this experiment), <i>T<sub>h </sub></i>is the handling time (proportion of the exposure time that a predator spends in identifying, pursuing, killing, consuming and digesting prey).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Data were analyzed using least squares regression by fitting a line through the data points predicted by the descriptive functional response equation using STATGRAPHICS <i>Plus 5.0</i></font></p> <b><font face="Verdana" size="3">     <p>Results</p> </font></b><font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>An increase in prey density eventually resulted in a higher predation rate. The functional response of <i>C. camposi </i>with adult female as prey showed a curvilinear rise to a plateau as seen in <a href="#t1">Table 1</a> and <a href="#i1">Fig. 1</a>. The daily feeding of adult <i>C. camposi </i>on adult females of <i>P. ulmi </i>increased at an accelerated rate when prey density was between 5 and 30 prey. Predation rate started to level off at a prey density of 30-50. The plateau was reached at approximately 3.38 prey items per day.    <br> </p> </font>     <div style="text-align: center;"><font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p><img src="/img/revistas/rbt/v56n3/art22t1.gif" title="" alt=""  style="width: 569px; height: 250px;"><a name="t1"></a></p> </font></div> <small><span style="font-family: verdana;">The average number of adult females consumed by one predator per day was 3.38 ±1.04, ranging from 0 to 6. Daily predation rate gradually increased when </span><i style="font-family: verdana;">P. ulmi </i><span  style="font-family: verdana;">were provided at increasing prey densities (</span><a href="#i1" style="font-family: verdana;">Fig. 1</a><span  style="font-family: verdana;">).</span></small>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> <font face="Verdana" size="2">    <br> </font>     <div style="text-align: center;"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><img  src="/img/revistas/rbt/v56n3/art22i1.jpg" title="" alt=""  style="width: 580px; height: 263px;"><a name="i1"></a></font>    <br> </div> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>    <br> </p> </font>     <div style="text-align: center;"><font face="Verdana" size="2">     <p>    <br> </p> </font>    <br> <font face="Verdana" size="2">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p> </p> </font></div> <b><font face="Verdana" size="3"> </font></b>     <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="3">Discusion </font></b><font  face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">It was clearly demonstrated that increase of prey number was related to the daily consumption number of <i>P. ulmi. </i>The predation rate tended to decrease with prey density, probably due to an increasing satiation by predators in patches of higher density. Thus predation rates followed a type II functional response which is shared by most phytoseiid predators (Sabelis 1986). </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">However, it is necessary to consider the results with caution because in other experiment, when the excised pieces of leaves were changed to a whole plant system and hence the predators were allowed to disperse from areas of low return (rewards) to more profitable patches of prey, the functional response changed from type II to type III. The functional response type III is the only type that contributes to prey population regulation (Hassell 1976, Hassell 1978).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The predation rate obtained for <i>C. camposi </i>on <i>P. ulmi </i>at the highest density tested, can be considerer similar to the predation rate of generalist phytoseiid predators with lifestyle type III (McMurtry and Croft 1997) such as <i>Amblyseius idaeus </i>Moraes and McMurtry (Cédola and Botto 1996) and <i>Typhlodromus bambusae </i>Ehara (Zhang <i>et al. </i>1999), and lower than specialized phytoseiid mite predators with life-style type I (Everson 1979, Cédola and Botto 1996). </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The expected numbers of consumed prey generated according to each model, are shown in <a href="#t1">Table 1</a> and <a href="#i1">Fig. 1</a>.All the predation models used estimate the expected number of prey consumed similarly. This conclusion is supported by the fractional values of estimated X<sup>2 </sup>goodness of fit test, which are much lower than the table X<sup>2 </sup>value of 11.07 at p &lt;0.05 with 5 degrees of freedom (<a href="#t1">Table 1</a>). </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">The values of the instantaneous rate of discovery or attack rate coefficient (in units of the proportion of the total prey number consumed or the total area searched) and handling time (in units of the proportion of 24 h exposure period) for predator attacking adult European red mite females, are shown in <a href="#t2">Table 2</a>.    <br> </font></p>     <p style="text-align: center;"><font face="Verdana" size="2"><img  src="/img/revistas/rbt/v56n3/art22t2.gif" title="" alt=""  style="width: 289px; height: 173px;"><a name="t2"></a>    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<br> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Fan and Pettit (1994) found that the Woolf transformation not only linealizes Holling’s (1959b) disc equation, but also reduces the variance heterogeneity, thus providing the best parameter estimate among four commonly used linear transformations as well as non-linear regression. Therefore, we considerer the Woolf transformation results in estimating <i>a </i>and <i>T<sub>h </sub></i>as the most precise and, hence, the standard of reference among all the models used in this study. On this basis, Rogers’s (1972) and Holling models generates lower values for handling time i.e. it overestimate this parameter, whereas Livdahl and Stiven’s(1983) models overestimate <i>a </i>and underestimate <i>T<sub>h </sub></i>(Juliano and Williams 1985, Williams and Juliano 1985, Fan and Pettit 1994). </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">Aside from the simplicity of the conditions under which these experiments were conducted, the functional response does not by itself show the true regulative power of a predator. Because in spite that the ability of a predator to control depends on the predator’s functional and numerical response, this response are influenced by different factors, including behavioral patterns in response to its own densities, developmental response, preference , utilization of alternative prey and intraguild interaction (Lester and Harmsen 2002). So one should take great caution in extrapolating the results of oversimplified laboratory experiments to more complex and heterogeneous field conditions. (O’Neil 1997, Lester and Harmsen 2002). O’Neil (1997) considerer that high prey density laboratory studies focuses attention on predator consumptive behavior, such as handling time, which are not important when prey attacks are low. Nevertheless, due to their relatively good predatory traits, <i>C. camposi </i>is presumably able to be used in conservation biological control approach against European red mite on trees in southern Chile. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">At least according to Badii <i>et al</i>. (1999) on the basis of the findings for this predaceous phytoseiid mite, we propose that applied acarologist interested in the control of spider mites by means of the predaceous phytoseiids should pay more attention to this species as a very promising (and at the same time a very neglected) candidate for being employed as a biocontrol agent and so enhancing our natural enemy potential. </font></p> <b><font face="Verdana" size="3"> </font></b>     <p><b><font face="Verdana" size="3">Acknowledgmets</font></b><font  face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">This study was supported by the Dirección de Investigación y Desarrollo and the Instituto de Producciòn y Sanidad Vegetal of the Universidad Austral de Chile.</font></p> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p> <font face="Verdana" size="2"><b> </b></font>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Resumen </b> </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2">La respuesta funcional del ácaro fitoseido nativo <i>Chileseius camposi </i>González y Schuster, 1962, sobre el ácaro fitófago introducido <i>Panonychus ulmi </i>(Koch, 1836) (Acarina:Tetranychidae) fue evaluada en condiciones controladas de temperatura (20 ± 2 ºC), humedad relativa (75 ± 15%) y fotoperíodo (16:8 h L:O). Una respuesta funcional de tipo II, fue determinada (disco de Holling). Los modelos de Holling, Wolf y Rogers dieron valores similares para la estimación de los parámetros de la ecuación del disco de Holling, la estimación de estos parámetros por el modelo de Livdahl y Stiven fueron mayores. Los valores encontrados para la razón de ataque y el tiempo de manipulación pueden ser considerados dentro del ámbito normal para fitoseidos generalistas. </font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana" size="2"><b>Palabras clave: </b><i>Chilesius camposi, Panonychus ulmi, </i>depredación, respuesta funcional, Phytoseiidae.</font></p> <hr style="width: 100%; height: 2px;">     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana" size="2"> </font></p>     <p align="center"><font face="Verdana" size="2">Received 24-IV-2007. Corrected 01-II-2008. Accepted 31-VII-2008.</font></p> <b><font face="Verdana" size="3">     <p>References </p> </font></b><font face="Verdana" size="2">     <!-- ref --><p>Badii M., J.A. McMurtry &amp; A Flores. 1999. Rates of development, survival and predation of immature stages of <i>Phytoseilus longipes </i>(Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 23: 611-621.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699084&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Berryman A. 1992. The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory. Ecology 75: 1530-1535.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699086&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Cédola C &amp; E. Botto. 1996. Evaluación de la respuesta functional de <i>Amblyseius idaeus </i>Moraes y McMurtry, 1983 y <i>Phytoseiulus macropilis </i>(Banks, 1905) (Acarina:Phytoseiidae) en condiciones de laboratorio. Revista Chilena de Entomología 23: 15-18 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699088&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Everson P. 1979. The functional response of <i>Phytoseiulus persimilis </i>(Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to various densities of <i>Tetranychus urticae </i>(Acarina: Tetranychidae). Canadian Entomologist 111: 7-10.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699089&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><p>Fan Y &amp; F. Petit. 1994 Parameter estimation of functional response. Environmental Entomologist 23: 785-794.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699091&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>González R &amp; R. Schuster. 1962. Especies de la familia Phytoseiidae en Chile I.(Acarina:Mesostigmata). Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Chile Boletín Técnico Nº 16 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699093&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p>Guajardo M. 1993. Acaros asociados a un huerto de manzanos de la la Décima Región y su respuesta a diferentes insecticidas con distinto sitio de acción. Tesis de Licenciatura, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699094&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hassell M. 1976. Arthropod predator-prey systems, p 105-131. <i>In </i>May R (ed.) Theoretical ecology, principles and applications. Second edition. Blackwell ScientificPublications, Oxford, United Kingdom.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699096&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Hassell M. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princenton University Press, Princenton, New Jersey, USA.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699098&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Holling C. 1959a. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly. Canadian Entomologist 91: 293-320.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699100&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Holling C. 1959b. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasistism. Canadian Entomologist 91:385-398.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699102&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Holling C. 1961. Principles of insect predation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 6:163-182.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699104&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Juliano S. &amp; F. Williams. 1985. On the evolution of handling time. Evolution 39:212-215.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699106&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Klein C. &amp; D. Waterhouse. 2000. The distribution and importance of arthropods associated with agriculture and forestry in Chile. ACIAR Monograph Nº 68.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699108&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Lester P. &amp; R. Harmsen. 2002. Functional and numerical responses not always indicate the most effective predator for biological control: an analysis of two predators in a two-prey system. Journal of Applied Ecology 39:455-468.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699110&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Livdahl T. &amp; A. Stiven. 1983. Statistical difficulties in the analysis of predator functional response data. Canadian Entomologist 115: 1365-1370.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699112&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>McMurtry J. &amp; D. Croft.1997. Life styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles as biological control agents. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42: 291-321.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699114&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Mori H. &amp; D. Chant. 1966. The influence of prey density, relative humidity and starvation on the predaceous behavior of <i>Phytpseiulus persimilis </i>Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 44:483-491.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699116&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>O’Neil R. 1997. Functional response and search strategy of <i>Podissus maculiventris </i>(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) attacking Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology 26: 1183-1190.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699118&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Rogers D. 1972. Random search and insect population models. Journal of Animal Ecology 18:1-35.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699120&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Sabelis M. 1986. The functional response of predatory mites to the density of two spider mites, p.298-321. <i>In </i>Metz J. &amp; Diekmann O. (eds.). Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations, Lecture Notes in Biomathemathics. Springer Verlag, Belin, Germany.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699122&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Solomon M. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. Journal of Animal Ecology 41: 369-383.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699124&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Van De Vrie M., JMcMurtry &amp; C. Huffaker. 1972. Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. III: Biology, ecology and pest status and host-plant relation of tetranychid. Hilgardia 41: 343-432.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699126&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Venegas C. 1977. Biology, population dynamic and antagonists of some apple phytophagous insects and mites (<i>Malus pumila </i>Mill.) in Valdivia. Tesis de Ingeniero Agrónomo, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699128&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200024&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Williams F. &amp; S. Juliano. 1985. Further difficulties in the analisis of functional response experiments and resolution. Canadian Entomologist 117:631-640.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699130&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200025&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p>     <!-- ref --><p>Zhang Y., Z. Zhang, J. Lin &amp; Q. Liu. 1999. Biology of <i>Typhlodromus bombusae </i>(Acari: Phytoseiidae) a predator of <i>Schizotetranychus nanjingensis </i>(Acari: Tetranychidae) injurous to bamboo in Funjian,China. Systematic Applied Acarology 4: 57-62.    &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=1699132&pid=S0034-7744200800030002200026&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --> </p> </font>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Badii]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McMurtry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.A]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Flores]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Rates of development, survival and predation of immature stages of Phytoseilus longipes (Acari: Mesostigmata: Phytoseiidae]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Exp. Appl. Acarol]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>611-621</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Berryman]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The origins and evolution of predator-prey theory]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Ecology]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>75</volume>
<page-range>1530-1535</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Cédola]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Botto]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="es"><![CDATA[Evaluación de la respuesta functional de Amblyseius idaeus Moraes y McMurtry, 1983 y Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks, 1905) (Acarina:Phytoseiidae) en condiciones de laboratorio]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Revista Chilena de Entomología]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>15-18</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Everson]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The functional response of Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acarina: Phytoseiidae) to various densities of Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Entomologist]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>111</volume>
<page-range>7-10</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Fan]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Petit]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Parameter estimation of functional response]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental Entomologist]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<page-range>785-794</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[González]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Schuster]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Especies de la familia Phytoseiidae en Chile I. (Acarina:Mesostigmata)]]></source>
<year>1962</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Agronomía. Universidad de Chile]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Guajardo]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Acaros asociados a un huerto de manzanos de la la Décima Región y su respuesta a diferentes insecticidas con distinto sitio de acción]]></source>
<year>1993</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Arthropod predator-prey systems]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[May]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Theoretical ecology, principles and applications]]></source>
<year>1976</year>
<edition>Second</edition>
<page-range>105-131</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Oxford ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Blackwell ScientificPublications]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Hassell]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems]]></source>
<year>1978</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Princenton^eNew Jersey New Jersey]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Princenton University PressUSA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Entomologist]]></source>
<year>1959</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<page-range>293-320</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasistism]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Entomologist]]></source>
<year>1959</year>
<volume>91</volume>
<page-range>385-398</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Holling]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Principles of insect predation]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annu. Rev. Entomol]]></source>
<year>1961</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<page-range>163-182</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juliano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[On the evolution of handling time]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Evolution]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>212-215</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Klein]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Waterhouse]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[The distribution and importance of arthropods associated with agriculture and forestry in Chile]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[ACIAR]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lester]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Harmsen]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional and numerical responses not always indicate the most effective predator for biological control: an analysis of two predators in a two-prey system]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Applied Ecology]]></source>
<year>2002</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<page-range>455-468</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Livdahl]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Stiven]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[McMurtry]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Croft]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Life styles of Phytoseiid mites and their roles as biological control agents]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annu. Rev. Entomol]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<page-range>291-321</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Mori]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Chant]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The influence of prey density, relative humidity and starvation on the predaceous behavior of Phytpseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot (Acarina: Phytoseiidae)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Journal of Zoology]]></source>
<year>1966</year>
<volume>44</volume>
<page-range>483-491</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[O’Neil]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Functional response and search strategy of Podissus maculiventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) attacking Colorado Potato Beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Environmental Entomology]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<page-range>1183-1190</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Rogers]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Random search and insect population models]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Ecology]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>18</volume>
<page-range>1-35</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sabelis]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The functional response of predatory mites to the density of two spider mites]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Metz]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Diekmann]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[O]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations, Lecture Notes in Biomathemathics]]></source>
<year>1986</year>
<page-range>298-321</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Belin ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer VerlagGermany]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Solomon]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The natural control of animal populations]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Journal of Animal Ecology]]></source>
<year>1949</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>369-383</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Van De Vrie]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[JMcMurtry]]></surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Huffaker]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecology of tetranychid mites and their natural enemies: a review. III: Biology, ecology and pest status and host-plant relation of tetranychid]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hilgardia]]></source>
<year>1972</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<page-range>343-432</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Venegas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biology, population dynamic and antagonists of some apple phytophagous insects and mites (Malus pumila Mill.) in Valdivia]]></source>
<year>1977</year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Williams]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Juliano]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Further difficulties in the analisis of functional response experiments and resolution]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Canadian Entomologist]]></source>
<year>1985</year>
<volume>117</volume>
<page-range>631-640.</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Y]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Zhang]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Z]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Lin]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Liu]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Q]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biology of Typhlodromus bombusae (Acari: Phytoseiidae) a predator of Schizotetranychus nanjingensis (Acari: Tetranychidae) injurous to bamboo in Funjian,China]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Systematic Applied Acarology]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<page-range>57-62</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
