Inglés (pdf)
Articulo en XML
Referencias del artículo
Traducción automática
Enviar articulo por email
Citado por SciELO 
Similares en
SciELO 
Permalink
Introduction
Periodontitis (POD) is defined as the progressive inflammation and destruction of the supporting tissues of the tooth including the gum, periodontal ligament, cement, and alveolar bone, this set is known as periodontium (1,2).
In POD, the presence of periodontal pockets is key to the diagnosis, being these the pathological deepening of the gingival sulcus with a measurement greater than or equal to four mm, originating a loss of clinical insertion (PI) (2).
The product of the local inflammatory response eventually became evident in the gingival sulcus through the Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF). It has been detected that in pathological processes the volume of the plasma increases and may slightly change its tone due to the permeability of the vessels present in the epithelial junction that allow the plasma to access the bag (3,4). Analysis of the composition of the GCF can help to identify potential biomarkers of periodontitis (5).
Currently, the term "osteoimmunology" has been introduced, focusing on signaling between cells of the immune system and bone. In the early stages of the infection, the non-specific immune system is activated, later, T and B lymphocytes enter the picture because the T cells that activate macrophages, can indirectly activate osteoclasts and their precursors, and directly to the expression of the receptor-ligand activator of the nuclear factor Kappa Beta (RANKL) (6).
During this inflammatory process, various cytokines are produced that are responsible for regulating the pathophysiology of POD through an interaction between tissue cells and those of the immune system; this inflammation together with the participation of interleukins and RANKL leads to the destruction of the periodontium (7,8).
RANKL together with its receptor (RANK) participates in the signaling pathway that regulates the molecular mechanism of the osteoclast formation process, called osteoclastogenesis (9). Current science has shown that in the presence of inflammation the balance of this pathway is altered, causing bone resorption or destruction to exceed new bone formation in patients with POD (10,11).
Sphingolipids are primary elements in the cell membranes, they function for cell signaling and some regulatory processes. The signaling cascade of these lipids includes other bioactive mediators, ceramine, sphingosine, and sphingosine- 1-phosphate (S1P) (12).
S1P has been identified in bone remodeling processes; inducing the formation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts (13,14). Studies have demonstrated the participation of S1P in inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, and bone homeostasis (15,16). In vitro and in vivo models reported that S1P induces chemotaxis and regulates the migration of osteoclast precursors in bone tissue homeostasis (17,18).
S1P is a bioactive sphingolipid product of sphingosine kinase phosphorylation, which acts as a mediator in many physiological processes including angiogenesis, neurogenesis, inflammation, and lymphocyte trafficking (19). S1P could be a powerful coupling factor between macrophages and osteoclast precursors (20) however, the role it plays in the osteoclastogenesis of POD remains unclear. This study aimed to determine Sphingosine-1- phosphate (S1P) concentration through ELISA test from gingival crevicular fluid (LCG) and saliva samples on periodontitis patients.
Materials and methods
An observational case-control study. 30 patients from 25 to 65 years of age, divided into two groups: 15 systemically healthy patients with POD and 15 systemically healthy subjects with no signs of POD. After voluntary informed consent, patients who attended the specialization area in Periodontics of the Faculty of Dentistry of the Autonomous University of Yucatan were inspected. The periodontal clinical history proposed by Mexican Official Standard (NOM) 013-SSA2-1994 was applied to all participants and a complete periodontal examination was performed, according to the new parameters established by AAP 2017 (21).
Using a calibrated probe from the University of North Carolina (Hu-Friedy, Chicago IL) and recording the data on a standardized periodontogram from the University of Bern; the depth and insertion loss (IP) of all teeth present was measured. All teeth except the third molars were analyzed in 6 sites: the mesiovestibular, vestibular, distovestibular, distolingual, lingual, and mesiolingual areas.
It was subsequently possible to diagnose POD following the criteria recommended in 2017, establishing our patients in Stage II Grade B of this disease (CAL 3-4m, X-ray bone loss of 15-33%, maximum probing depth of 5mm, and no tooth loss).
Sample collection was performed one week after the periodontal diagnosis session and patients were asked to abstain from food or liquids and to practice dental hygiene at least one hour before the sample was taken (22). No periodontal treatment was performed before examination (23).
GCF sample collection
In the case of the POD group, the most severe periodontal pocket was located in the periodontogram while in controls the first upper molar was sampled. Before the sample was taken, relative isolation was placed with sterile cotton rolls and supervising that the area was free of plaque or dental calculus. The GCF was collected by introducing PerioPaper strips (Oralflow Inc.) into the periodontal sulcus or pocket; approximately 1.2μL of the sample was collected for a standardized period of 30 seconds, avoiding any type of blood or saliva contamination. The strips were then stored in a 1.5ml Eppendorf tube. All samples that could be contaminated with blood or saliva were removed (24).
Saliva collection
The collection of saliva was taken before the GCF collection. A roll of sterile cotton was placed in the patient's oral cavity, asking him to perform jaw movements as well as swallowing movements for one minute, to stimulate saliva production. The cotton was then placed in a sterile 15ml Falcon tube (25).
Ssmple storage and processing
Both samples were stored at -70 ºC in the freezer until the day of their analysis. Subsequently, the GCF was extracted from the strip by elution of Phosphate Buffered Saline with 0.05% polysorbate 20 (PBS-T) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 minutes at 4 ºC, performing this procedure twice until a final volume of 220μl was reached (26).
For the extraction of saliva, temperature control and centrifugation at 10,000 rpm were performed for 15 minutes. This procedure was carried out 3 times until a minimum volume of 220μl was reached (25).
Quantification of S1P-ELISA protocol
The quantification of S1P in GCL and saliva samples from periodontitis patients and control were analyzed by the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (Human S1P Elisa kit, MyByosourse #MBS2516132). The ELISA protocol of this study was of a detection range of 3.13-200ng/mL and sensitivity of 1.88ng/ mL. In the ELISA plate wells preloaded with human S1P antibody, 100mL of saliva and GCF samples were added, and the protocol was followed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plates were immediately read on the BioRad Model xMark ELISA reader at 450nm.
Results
A total sample of 30 subjects reported no medical condition. The 66.66% (20 subjects) were women and the remaining 33.33% (10 subjects) were men, included in the 25-65 age range; also divided into Group 1 (cases) and Group 2 (controls). The average age for Group 1 was 48.86 years, while for Group 2 it was 41.53 years. The body mass index (BMI) in the case group was 28.28 and 27.18 in controls, which according to the World Health Organization (WHO) is classified as overweight (27). The periodontal characteristics of the study sample are described in Table 1.
Elevated levels of S1P in GCF were detected in patients with POD (20,0965 ng/mL) compared to the control group (15,2058 ng/mL), however, no statistically significant difference was detected between the two groups. Elevated levels of S1P in saliva were found in control patients (72.9457 ng/ mL) compared to patients with POD (45.1267 ng/mL), with a statistical significance of p<0.05 (Figure 1).
No significant difference was found when comparing the amount of insertion loss with the concentration of S1P in saliva and GCF (p=0.79, p=0.840 respectively) by Spearman correlation.
Table 1 Periodontal characteristics of the studied sample (Mean ± Standard deviation)
| - | Group 1 | Group 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Probing depth * (mm) | 3.24 ± 1.13 | 1.75 ± 0.2948 |
| % bleeding* | 35.93 ±26.39 | 3 ± 3.98 |
| PI* (rank) | -3.5667±0.99 | -1.7867±0.2972 |
| - | (-6.2mm, -2.3 mm) | (-2.4 mm, -1.4mm) |
*p<0.05. PI, clinical insertion.
Discussion
Some regulatory pathways of osteoclastogenesis of alveolar bone have been described, such as RANK-OPG-RANKL; S1P has been identified at a systemic level in diseases such as cancer, arthritis, blood vessel formation, among others. Lately, this sphingosine has started to be mentioned at bone level, however, it has not been widely studied in the loss of alveolar bone characteristic of periodontitis.
Authors mention the activity of S1P in osteoclastogenesis as well as in osteogenesis (28,29), a role that it performs in conjunction with its S1PR1 receptor. Among the main functions of S1P, there is proliferation, migration, and signaling; in 2019, new actions were added such as cytoskeletal rearrangement, inflammation, adhesion, and trafficking of various cells of the immune and vascular systems (30).
As for S1P levels, increased concentration of S1P has been localized in cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, and atherosclerosis. The levels of circulating S1P in the blood are produced by the red blood cells, so the hematocrit value influences their concentration (31).
In the case of bone pathologies, a loss of the balance between S1P-S1PR1 has been observed, which regulates the activities of signaling and chemotherapeutic attraction of osteoclast precursors. When this balance is broken, alterations arise, such as aberrant bone remodeling, inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis. In these conditions, excess osteoclastogenic stimulation exceeds new bone formation, resulting in net bone resorption and loss. Xiao et al., reported in a model of periodontitis in rats, the elevation of S1P in the affected site, as well as our results obtained in GCF, also identified induction of chemoattractant activity achieving higher amounts of RANKL (14).
Our study found elevated levels of S1P in GCF in patients with POD concerning controls; one of the justifications for this could be what several authors explain, that when there are high concentrations of S1P and even the higher these are, it induces hyperpermeability of the endothelial barrier causing a loss of integrity of the barrier and increased vascular tone (14,32) (Figure 2); Just what happens in periodontitis, where there is an exudate of substances from the circulation, which crosses the barrier of the junction epithelium causing inflammation.
Figure 2 Possible mechanism of action of S1P during inflammation and osteoclastogenic process in POD. Chemotaxis of preosteoclasts, osteoclasts and macrophages are caused by elevated levels of S1P in situ; osteoblasts and immune system cells, such as T cells, contribute to the production of RANKL, which when joined with RANK lead to osteoclast differentiation. Mature osteoclasts produce S1P, which again results in an increase in the amount of sphingosine present at the site, a possible loss of endothelial barrier integrity and consequently local inflammation. Servier Medical ART ©.
On the other hand, the destruction of alveolar bone tissue in periodontitis is characterized by an increase in the activity of osteoclasts, derived from osteoclast precursors, attracted to the site of destruction thanks to S1P. S1P induces the production of RANKL through the osteoblasts and T lymphocytes, and when these join with RANK they initiate the formation of osteoclasts. Once differentiated, osteoclasts can also produce S1P, creating a bi-directional feed circuit for osteoclastogenesis (14,33,34). This confirms another possible explanation for the high concentration of S1P in the gingival crevicular fluid of patients with POD.
S1P signaling is critical for modulating the migration of monocytes and macrophages from the bloodstream to affected bone and bone tissues. These monocytes and macrophages are known as osteoclastic precursors, leading to bone loss (16,34).
In saliva, our study reveals high concentrations of S1P in control patients over patients with POD. Among the main components of saliva in healthy patients, there is a high proportion of glycoproteins, such as mucins, proline, immunoglobulins (Ig), agglutinins, lactoferrin, cystatins, and lysozyme (35). The main type of immunoglobulin secreted in the saliva is Immunoglobulin A (IgA) (36).
A key relationship has been established between S1P and IgA, as sphingosine acts on the versatile pathways of production of this immunoglobulin at the level of intestinal fluids (37). Saliva, also being a body fluid, a change in salivary composition between patients with some disease such as POD and healthy patients, may affect the amount of S1P present; this sphingolipid is hydrophobic in nature, not very soluble in water and requires transport proteins for efficient transport and circulation. For example, in plasma, most are transported by high-density proteins and the rest by albumin (24). It is possible that due to maladjustment in the salivary composition and a greater number of microorganisms in the presence of this pathology, a lower amount of S1P could be found.
Conclusions
Although no statistically significant difference in LCG was found in this study, higher levels of S1P were observed in patients with periodontitis. While in saliva it was shown that the difference was greater in the control group and significant, we were able to identify that the LCG could be an indicator for the identification of POD through the quantification of S1P, however further studies are required to be able to propose a possible route of bone metabolism, inflammatory process and identification of POD.
Author contribution statement
Conceptualization and Design: M.I.G.P, V.M.M.A and E.G.C.C.
Literature Review: M.I.G.P., V.M.M.A. and E.G.C.C. Methodology and Validation: M.J.C, B.A.C.A, V.M.M.A and E.G.C.C.
Formal Analysis: E.A.S.E and V.M.M.A.
Investigation and Data Collection: M.I.G.P, E.A.S.E and M.J.C.
Resources: V.M.M.A and M.J.C.
Data Analysis and Interpretation: M.I.G.P, V.M.M.A and E.G.C.C.
Writing-Original Draft Preparation: M.I.G.P, V.M.M.A and E.G.C.C.
Writing-Review & Editing: all authors. Supervision: all authors.
Project Administration: V.M.M.A, B.A.C.A and M.J.C. Funding Acquisition: V.M.M.A and M.J.C.
