-
The biogeographic Choco is one of the most biodiverse places on the planet (Torres-Torres, Mena, & Álvarez, 2016; Torres-Torres, Mena, & Álvarez, 2017). Its forests have the highest number of species and communities per unit of area, 300 species in 0,1ha in zonal vegetation (Mosquera, Medina, & Martínez, 2012; Palacios, Perea, Bedillo, Caicedo, & Abadia, 2017; Mena, Andrade, & Torres-Torres, 2020). Its floristic variety, endemism and the threat to its natural resources make it one of the planet's biodiversity hotspots (Myers, Mittermeiner, Mittermeiner, De Fonseca, & Kent, 2000).
Anthropic activities such as conversion of forest land to agricultural and livestock uses, mining extraction and unplanned harvesting of forest resources by local communities have led to the reduction of populations of forest species such as Handroanthus chrysantha Jacq., currently categorized as Critically Endangered (CE) (Blaser & Thompson, 2010). The specimens of this species registered in the department of Choco are scarce (78 individuals), and 60% of them are in the upper diameter classes (Klínger et al., 2011). This situation is compounded by the fact that at the local level few alternatives have been undertaken to contribute to the sustainability of this species in the forest ecosystems of this state; furthermore, at the regional level, information regarding its germination, growth and initial adaptation to different organic substrates and pre-germination treatments is limited, making it difficult to manage.
Based on the above, Martínez, Torres-Torres, and Medina (2015) suggest that this situation requires environmental authorities to exercise control over activities that deteriorate forest ecosystems and restrict their conservation and protection. Therefore, it is vitally important to develop studies of the behavior of forest species in nurseries that guarantee the obtaining of the necessary plant material for their subsequent establishment in the forests, as an alternative to mitigate the damage caused and contribute to the restoration of the composition and structure of the forest.
In the search for alternatives to recover and conserve threatened forest species of socio-ecological importance, the use of organic substrates such as alluvial sand, forest soil, ant soil, leaf litter and rice husk has been proposed (Trujillo, 1995; Pinilla et al., 2016; Torres-Torres, Medina, & Martínez, 2018b). Similarly, mechanical scarification and immersion of seeds in water at different temperatures and for different periods of time are recommended as pre-germination treatments (Torres-Torres, Medina, Pinilla, Córdoba & Martínez, 2017; Torres-Torres, Medina, & Martínez, 2018a; 2018c).
Therefore, the purpose of this research was to evaluate the effect of four pre-germination treatments and organic substrates on the germination and initial growth of H. chrysantha. This was done under two environmental conditions (free sun exposure and under shade), seeking to obtain as much information as possible to contribute to the propagation strategies of this species.
Materials and methods
Area of study: The investigation was carried out in the town of Salero, municipality of Unión Panamericana, Choco, Colombia (5°20'07,5"N & 76°37’30”W). This place is characterized by an average temperature of 28°C, rainfall of 10 000mm, 90% relative humidity and an altitude of 100masl (Alcaldía de Unión Panamericana, 2016).
Experimental design: A multi-factorial, randomized experimental design, consisting of 32 controlled factors, was used. The main components were four immersion times, four organic substrates in different combinations and proportions, and two lighting conditions (Table 1).
Installation of the experiment: A 15 square meter nursery was built, consisting of two 1,10m x 4m germination beds, raised to one meter above the ground. The wood was immunized with cypermentine. The aerial part of the infrastructure was covered with translucent polypropylene plastic. The first set of factors was placed inside, 20m away from the nursery, a germination bed was built with the same dimensions as the previous ones, where the second set of factors was established at full sun exposure.
Origin and sowing of the seeds: The seeds used were obtained from commercial houses and were sown in seedbeds. Each factor was composed of twelve replicates. Four seeds were sown per cell. This was done at a depth of 1cm. Two factors were placed randomly in each seedbed and identified with a legend or sign. The factors were spatially distributed identically in each light condition: sun and shade. A total of 1 536 seeds were used, distributed in 32 factors.
Monitoring of the experiment: The germination of the seeds was quantified every eight days, during one month. When the seedlings reached a height of 5cm, they were transplanted in their entirety into 1kg black polyethylene bags, with the same substrates used initially.
Pre-germination treatments | Organic substrates | Controlled factors | |||
A(witness): non-immersion | E (witness): Alluvial sand | AE | BE | CE | DE |
B: Water immersion for 24 hours | F: Chicken manure+ alluvial sand + ant soil 1:1:1 | AF | BF | CF | DF |
C: Water immersion for 36 hours | G: Chicken manure+ ant land 2:1 | AG | BG | CG | DG |
D: Water immersion for 48 hours | H: Alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1 | AH | BH | CH | DH |
Variables evaluated and form of measurement: The evaluation of the variables of growth in height of the seedlings and survival was initiated 30 days after the transplant to the polyethylene bags. For the evaluation of these variables, 22% of the planted material was used (10 seedlings per factor). Survival was estimated using the following equation (Rivera, Peñuela, Jiménez, & Vargas, 2013):
These variables were measured every 15 days for three months. All seedlings were given two daily risks and monitored to detect and avoid any affectation.
Data analysis: The statistical analysis was carried out using the STATGRAPHISCS version 5.1 software. A multifactorial 4x4x2 design with 12 repetitions was applied, which is described by the following mathematical model:
Where: is the growth of the seedlings in cm; is the overall average growth of the seedlings; is the simple effect of the pre-sprouting; is the simple effect of the type of organic substrate; is the simple effect of the light condition; is the effect of interaction between pre-sprouting and light condition; is the effect of interaction between type of organic substrate and light condition; is the mistake.
An analysis of multifactorial variance (ANOVA) with a significance level of α = 0,05 and a 95% reliability was performed to evaluate the efficiency of pre-germination and organic substrates and to identify the factors that favored the growth in heights of H. chrysantha seedlings. The analysis was supplemented by testing the minimal significant difference of Fisher's (LSD) with 95% confidence.
Results
Germination: H. chrysantha, presented epigea germination. This began two days after sowing and ended 30 days after the seeds were sown.
At the end of the evaluation period, 395 and 290 germinated seeds were recorded, corresponding to 51 and 38% of the total sown under shade and sun, respectively (Table 2).
Source | Sum of Squares | Degrees of freedom | Medium Square | Reason -F | Value -P |
Co-variable | |||||
Days | 1 018,88 | 1 | 1 018,88 | 109,75 | 0,0000 |
Main effects | |||||
A: Pre-germination | 381,847 | 3 | 127,28 | 1,37 | 0,2547 |
B: Substrate | 595,012 | 3 | 198,34 | 2,14 | 0,0989 |
C: Lighting | 987,042 | 1 | 987,04 | 106,32 | 0,0001 |
Interactions | |||||
AB | 685,304 | 9 | 761,45 | 8,20 | 0,0000 |
AC | 395,727 | 3 | 131,91 | 1,42 | 0,2398 |
BC | 238,534 | 3 | 795,11 | 8,56 | 0,0000 |
ABC | 312,075 | 9 | 34,68 | 3,74 | 0,0003 |
Waste | 1 179,03 | 127 | 928,37 | ||
Total | 4 558,12 | 159 |
Germination rates above 70% were obtained for seeds sown in the factors AE (no pre-germination with alluvial sand), AH (no pre-germination with alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1), BE (24 hour water immersion with alluvial sand), BF (24 hour water immersion with chicken manure + alluvial sand + ant soil 1:1:1) and BH (24 hour water immersion with alluvial sand + ant soil 2: 1) under shaded conditions and, AG (no pre-germination with chicken manure + ant soil 2:1), AH (no pre-germination with alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1), BE (24 hour water immersion with alluvial sand), BG (24 hours water immersion with chicken manure + ant soil 2:1) and BH (24 hour water immersion with alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1) in the sun respectively (Fig. 1). This result allows us to infer that in order to accelerate the germination of H. chrysantha, the seeds should be subjected to imbibition periods less than or equal to 24 hours.
In Fig. 1, it can be seen that in the majority of the factors with the presence of pre-germinative B: (imbibition in water for 24 hours) the best results of germination were obtained.
AE: No Immersion and alluvial sand; AF: No Immersion and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; AG: No Immersion and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; AH: No Immersion and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; BE: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand; BF: Water immersion for 24 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; BG: Water immersion for 24 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; BH: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; CE: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand; CF: Water immersion for 36 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; CG: Water immersion for 36 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; CH: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; DE: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand; DF: Water immersion for 48 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; DG: Water immersion for 48 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; DH: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1
Height growth: The results of the analysis of variance and Fisher's Minimal Significant Difference test (p<0,05) indicate that there were significant statistical differences between the pre-germinatives (effect A), nor between the substrates (effect B) used in this investigation (Table 2). Consequently, any of the combinations could be used for the growth of this forest species in the nursery.
When analyzing the interactions between the principal components, differences were detected between the principal effects AB and BC; and triple interaction between the principal effects ABC around the growth of the seedlings (Fisher, p<0,05) (Table 2).
Average growth values of 8 and 18cm were obtained for seedlings located under shade and sun respectively (Table 2).
AE: No Immersion and alluvial sand; AF: No Immersion and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; AG: No Immersion and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; AH: No Immersion and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; BE: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand; BF: Water immersion for 24 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; BG: Water immersion for 24 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; BH: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; CE: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand; CF: Water immersion for 36 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; CG: Water immersion for 36 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; CH: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; DE: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand; DF: Water immersion for 48 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; DG: Water immersion for 48 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; DH: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1
Ten factors located at free sun exposure (AF, AG, AH, BF, BG, BH, CE, CH, DG and DH) recorded growth values greater than 19cm (Fig. 2).
Fisher's LSD test (p<0,05) suggests that it is indifferent to use any type of substrate (E, F, G or H) in the growth of H. chrysantha seedlings as long as they receive direct radiation from the sun (Fig. 2). However, the yield is higher if the combination H (river sand + ant soil at 2:1) is used.
Survival: 270 of the 341 transplanted seedlings survived, corresponding to an overall percentage of 80,9%. In addition, it was observed that the factors BE, BH CF, CH, DF, DG and DH in sunny conditions and AH, BH, EC, DE and DG in the shade showed a high effectiveness in the survival of the seedlings with percentages of 100% (Fig. 3), not showing statistical differences between the factors evaluated. These results allow us to infer that any of the substrates used stimulate the survival of H. chrysantha.
AE: No Immersion and alluvial sand; AF: No Immersion and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; AG: No Immersion and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; AH: No Immersion and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; BE: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand; BF: Water immersion for 24 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; BG: Water immersion for 24 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; BH: Water immersion for 24 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; CE: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand; CF: Water immersion for 36 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; CG: Water immersion for 36 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; CH: Water immersion for 36 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1; DE: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand; DF: Water immersion for 48 hours and Chicken manure+alluvial sand+ant soil 1:1:1; DG: Water immersion for 48 hours and chicken manure+ ant land 2:1; DH: Water immersion for 48 hours and alluvial sand + ant soil 2:1
Discussion
The type of germination observed in H. chrysantha is similar to those reported for other timber species in the Colombian Chocó Biogeographic (Pinilla et al., 2016; Rengifo & Torres-Torres, 2016; Torres-Torres et al., 2017; Torres-Torres et al., 2018a; 2018b; 2018c). The time used for germination of seeds of the species under study differs from the results obtained by Cordero et al. (2003), who suggest that the germination process begins at seven days and extends to day 30. This result can be related to the latency process acquired by the seeds before research and the environmental conditions of the site, so Varela and Arana (2011), add that, this feature is an adaptation that contributes to the survival of the individual, since it restricts germination when environmental factors are unfavorable to the development of the seedling.
The germination results obtained in this study (Fig. 1) were lower than those reported by Aguirre, Günter, and Stim (2008), who obtained values of 72,7 and 68% for seeds harvested from premature and mature fruits of the tree and from mature fruits of the soil, respectively. From this, it can be deduced that the fresher the seeds, the higher the percentage of germination.
The best records of germination were obtained in plant material sown in the shade (Fig. 1); this may be related to the process of moisture conservation that occurs in shaded places, which favors the appearance of the moisture needed for the emergence of soil cotyledons (Suarez & Melgarejo, 2010; Torres-Torres et at., 2018c).
Varela and Arana (2011) mention that it is the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the substrates that guarantees the germination of the seeds and the correct development of the seedling. The results of the research contrast with this statement, because it is observed that the organic substrates used (individually) do not influence the germination of the seeds of H. chrysantha, nor when combined with pre-germination.
STRI (2013) and Torres-Torres et al. (2018a) suggest that seed pre-treatments positively influence seed germination, especially in forest species growing in tropical rainforests. These indications are validated with the results obtained in this research
The growth values obtained in this study are similar to those suggested by Román, De Liones, Sautu, Deago, and Hall (2012), who report growths of 19 to 30 cm in four months in free sun exposure, allowing this to infer that H. chrysantha requires direct light for its initial growth.
According to Cordero et al. (2003) and Román et al. (2012), the greatest growth of H. chrysantha is experienced in soils with little fertility and good drainage; this has been validated in the results of the present investigation, suggesting that the species under study is demanding in soils with good infiltration capacity, which facilitates root development.
In this sense, Torres-Torres et al. (2018a) indicate that the survival and initial growth of some forest species are influenced by the infiltration capacity of the organic substrates used in propagation; therefore, they suggest the use of combinations such as alluvial sand. This approach contrasts with what has been observed in the present research, in which it is evident that the survival of seedlings is similar in the different organic substrates used.
Taking into account the results obtained, it can be inferred that for the propagation of H. chrysantha the seeds should be sown (without application of pre-germination treatments) under shade using Chicken manure+ ant land in proportion 2:1. Once germinated the seeds, the seedlings must be placed to free exposure, using the same substrate in which the seeds germinated. Under these conditions the best results of germination, height growth and survival are obtained.
Eethics, conflict of interest, and funding statement
Authors declare that they have complied with all relevant ethical and legal requirements, both during the study and in the manuscript; that there are no conflicts of interest of any kind; and that all funding sources are fully and clearly detailed in the acknowledgements section. They also agree with the final edited version of the document. The respective signed legal document is in the archives of the journal.
The declaration of the contribution of each author to the manuscript is as follows: H.H.M.A: Coordination in the information gathering, initial writing of the document (introduction, results), J.J.T.T.: Manuscript structuring (assembly of each author's contribution), discussion writing, part of the introduction and translation of the article, C.A.P.P.: Part of the project formulation team, support in data collection, writing of the methodology, B.A.R.B.: Statistical analysis and experimental design, M.M.G. a: Support in the interpretation of the results and final conclusions, and L.R.M.: contribution to data collection