Life history characteristics, like duration of the reproductive cycle, or the size and number of offspring per female, are determined by poorly documented trade‐offs between traits (^{Roff, Heibo, & Vøllestad, 2006}). In the case of scorpions, there are a few quantitative studies of female and offspring characteristics within populations, but not among species. Larger mothers produce larger litters in Centruroides sculpturatus Ewing, 1928, C. exilicauda Wood, 1863 and Vaejovis spinigerus Wood, 1863 (^{Brown, 2004}; ^{Warburg, 2011}), but not in Scorpio maurus Linnaeus, 1758, Nebo hierichonticus Simon, 1872 and Tityus pusillus Pocock, 1893 (Warburg, 2011; ^{de Albuquerque & de Araujo, 2016}). To my knowledge, this is the first study to quantitatively compare life histories among species.

Characteristics for 94 species ( Table 1) were extracted from the literature (^{Polis, 1990}: Table 4.2 in pp.184-187; ^{Lourenço, 1992}: Table 2 in p. 49); and compared between species that reproduce year-round and seasonally. The majority of species included belong in the Buthidae (N=44 species) and Vaejovidae (N=19 species), while other families (Chactidae, Diplocentridae, Ischnuridae, Scorpionidae) had 6-9 species included; the lowest numbers were for Bohriuridae (N=4 species) and Iuridae (N=2 species). Additionally to statistical significance, all trait pairs were also plotted as scattergrams and visually checked for non-linear associations. Tests checked the model proposed by Polis (1990), basically that scorpions range from species with small individuals, short life cycles and abundant offspring (r strategists or opportunist species, mostly the highly diverse family Buthidae), to larger species that live in more stable habitats, have longer life cycles and care for a few large offspring (K or “equilibrium” species, most scorpion families).

Scatter-plots indicated that these scorpion life history characteristics lacked non-linear associations, which means that the linear statistics I used were appropriate to identify any possible correlations. Species that reproduce year-round have significantly shorter first instar periods (Mann-Whitney U, p<0,01, mostly Buthidae), but contrary to expectation (^{Polis, 1990}), species with larger bodies do not consistently have significantly larger litters, longer life cycles (including gestation, parturition, first instar, longevity) or more molts (Table 1).

In scorpions, reproductive seasonality can be highly variable and strongly correlated with environmental factors (e.g., ^{Yamaguti & Pinto-da-Rocha, 2006}). Scorpions may increase survival by having more reproductive episodes each year, explaining the shorter first instar periods found here for species with year-round reproduction. Apparently, seasonal species are more limited and invest in “quality” litters that need more time to reach independence, just as hypothesized earlier by ^{Brown (2003}).

Despite the lack of previous studies about maternal size and characteristics of offspring across species, it is known that within a species, not all large females have large litters (by both body mass and length: ^{Brown, 2004}; length: ^{Outeda-Jorge, Pinto-da-Rocha, & Mello, 2009}; body mass: ^{Warburg, 2011}), and the same trend was found in this study for species: species with larger (i.e. longer) mothers do not consistently have litters with more scorplings or offspring with longer life cycles and better longevity. These results fail to support the r and K model (^{Polis, 1990}; ^{Monge-Nájera & Lourenço, 1995}; ^{Romiguier et al., 2014}), a model that is based on few large and longevous individuals, versus many small and short lived individuals: the field is open for a new model. Additionally, the data summarized by Polis (1990) and Lourenço (1992), which are the basis of this note, should be taken with caution because they are of varied quality (some from formal studies, some from personal communications, many from the laboratory, few from the field). I hope this note will inspire future researchers to collect additional, better data, and to test these ideas again.

Ethical, conflict of interest and financial statements: the author declares that he has fully complied with all pertinent ethical and legal requirements, both during the study and in the production of the manuscript; that there are no conflicts of interest of any kind; that all financial sources are fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgements section; and that he fully agrees with the final edited version of the article. A signed document has been filed in the journal archives.