SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.70 número1Bibliometrics of Sudanese scientific publications: Subjects, institutions, collaboration, citation and recommendationsEffect of vegetation cover on dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) and their ecological functions in an Andean forest of Colombia índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista de Biología Tropical

versão On-line ISSN 0034-7744versão impressa ISSN 0034-7744

Rev. biol. trop vol.70 no.1 San José Jan./Dez. 2022

http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v70i1.46065 

Artículo

Half a century of Sri Lanka research: Subjects, researchers, institutions, journals and impact (1973-2019)

Medio siglo de investigación en Sri Lanka: temas, investigadores, instituciones, revistas e impacto (1973-2019)

1. Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, Colombo, Sri Lanka; priyanga@pharm.cmb.ac.lk; chiranthiliayange@pharm.cmb.ac.lk

2. Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad Estatal a Distancia, San José, Costa Rica; julianmonge@gmail.com

3. Trend Research Centre, Asia University, No. 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung 41354, Taiwan; ysho@asia.edu.tw (*Correspondence)

Abstract

Introduction:

Bibliometric analyses of research in Sri Lanka, a lower-middle income island nation in South Asia, has focused mainly on medical research, concluding that there is a need for increased research productivity and impact, and for local solutions to health concerns. There has been no general bibliometric analysis across scientific disciplines in the nation, or any study that covers a long period of time to identify general time trends.

Objective:

To measure and analyse Sri Lanka research by focusing on subjects, authors, institutions, journals and citation for half a century.

Methods:

We used an advanced search method to extract publications with the word “Sri Lanka” in the SCI-EXPANDED, and calculated indicators such as total citations from Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of 2019, citations in 2019, and mean citations per publication. Journal data were taken from 2019 Journal Citation Report. Affiliation re-classification was done to ensure consistency regarding the origin of all publications. Publications were further analysed based on collaboration, and first and corresponding authorship.

Results:

We retrieved 16 069 publications in 19 document types (77 % articles). Corrections had the highest number of authors per publication (616) followed by articles (116). Four articles had more than 5 000 authors and 593 articles had more than 1 000 authors. The highest citations in this database were for international megaprojects where Sri Lanka authors played minor roles. The UK had the most collaborative articles with Sri Lanka (19 %). The articles were published in 3 051 journals across 177 Web of Science categories. The category of Public, environmental and occupational health, with 193 journals, had 6.7 % of all articles, followed by environmental sciences (6.6 %).

Conclusion:

Sri Lanka has an unusually strong pattern of participating as small role players in international megaprojects about health and physics. Sri Lanka authors should be encouraged to expand their horizons by researching non-applied fields that are the basis of all innovation; to strengthen their own journals so that they have better visibility and impact, and to improve their positions in international projects that are published in larger journals.

Key words: bibliometric analysis; scientometrics; Science Citation Index Expanded; productivity

Resumen

Introducción:

Los análisis bibliométricos de la investigación en Sri Lanka, una nación insular de ingresos mediano-bajos en el sur de Asia, se han centrado principalmente en la investigación médica, concluyendo que existe la necesidad de aumentar la productividad y el impacto de la investigación, y de soluciones locales a los problemas de salud. No ha habido un análisis bibliométrico general de disciplinas científicas o algún estudio que cubra un período largo de tiempo para identificar tendencias generales.

Objetivo:

Medir y analizar la investigación de Sri Lanka centrándose en temas, autores, instituciones, revistas y citas, durante medio siglo.

Métodos:

Utilizamos un método de búsqueda avanzada para extraer publicaciones con las palabras “Sri Lanka” en el SCI-EXPANDED, y calculamos indicadores como el total de citas de Web of Science Core Collection desde el año de publicación hasta finales de 2019, citas solo en 2019, y media de citas por publicación. Los datos de revistas son del Journal Citation Report 2019. Revisamos manualmente las afiliaciones para garantizar su coherencia, y, de todos los tipos de publicación, analizamos en detalle los artículos en función de la colaboración y la autoría.

Resultados:

Hallamos 16 069 publicaciones en 19 tipos de documentos (77 % artículos). Las correcciones tuvieron el mayor número de autores por publicación (616), seguidas de los artículos (116 autores en promedio); cuatro artículos tenían más de 5 000 autores y 593 artículos tenían más de 1 000 autores. Las citas más altas en esta base de datos fueron para megaproyectos internacionales en los que los autores de Sri Lanka desempeñaron papeles menores. El Reino Unido tuvo más artículos colaborativos con Sri Lanka (19 %). Los artículos se publicaron en 3 051 revistas de 177 categorías del Web of Science. La categoría d Salud pública, ambiental y ocupacional, con 193 revistas, tuvo el 6.7 % del total de artículos, seguida de Ciencias ambientales (6.6 %).

Conclusión:

En Sri Lanka hay una tendencia inusual a participar como pequeños actores en megaproyectos internacionales sobre salud y física. Debería alentarse a quienes hacen ciencia en Sri Lanka a ampliar sus horizontes investigando campos no aplicados, que son la base de la innovación; a fortalecer sus propias revistas para lograr mayor visibilidad e impacto, y a mejorar su ubicación en proyectos internacionales que se publican en revistas más grandes.

Palabras clave: análisis bibliométrico; cienciometría; Science Citation Index Expanded; productividad

Introduction

Ever since Belgian librarian Paul Otlet coined the term ‘bibliometrics’ in the 1930s, it has grown in popularity as a research method (Rousseau, 2014); it uses statistical methods to measure the quantity, quality and impact of books, articles, and other forms of scientific publication (Durieux & Gevenois, 2010). Bibliometric indicators are often used as criteria for funding, appointments, and promotions of researchers (Durieux & Gevenois, 2010); and, from a broader perspective, bibliometrics are used to compare the scientific performance of countries, journals, research specialities and subject categories (Bah et al., 2019). Therefore, bibliometrics are one technique for depicting scientific research (Fu & Ho, 2013) and are part of the criteria for decisions in the development of science (Lucio-Arias & Leydesdorff, 2009). On the other hand, studies based on bibliometrics have been criticized because databases are biased against researchers publishing in small countries and languages other than English, for example, 95 % of Vietnamese articles are missing from the Science Citation Index because they are written in Vietnamese, and 78 % of Cuban science is also missing because it is published in Cuban journals that are not in that database; it is unfair to say that all that science missing from the Science Citation Index is not of good quality or useful (Añino et al., 2021).

Previous bibliometric studies in this series have evaluated the scientific publication output, trends, research fields, and citations in some databases across countries and continents, including for example Serbia (Ivanović & Ho, 2014), Costa Rica (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2012), and Taiwan (Chuang & Ho, 2015).

Sri Lanka is a lower-middle income island country in South Asia, with a population of nearly 22 million (Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka, 2020). Successive governments since the turn of the 21st century have instituted numerous schemes to promote research and development, including increased funding, support, and recognition in the form of research awards, which are expected to increase productivity and impact (Pratheepan & Weerasooriya, 2016).

Even though there are scarce studies about science in the country, it is known that many factors affect the citation of Sri Lanka medical research publications in the databases, including novelty, topic, study design, language, journal and collaborations (Annalingam et al., 2014).

The Science Citation Index fails to include most Sri Lanka medical journals, of which only one was indexed even in PubMed a decade ago (Ranasinghe et al., 2011). At the time, around 60 % of the national research output in medicine was published in non-indexed local journals (Ranasinghe et al., 2012). It is reasonable to assume that authors from other scientific disciplines in Sri Lanka also publish in local non-indexed journals, limiting the accessibility of local research publications to the international readership. A suggested solution was making journals accessible online (Ranasinghe et al., 2011).

Sri Lanka suffers from a rising incidence of both communicable diseases, such as dengue, leptospirosis and tuberculosis; and non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease and malignancies (Gunawardene, 1999). In addition, injuries, including road traffic accidents, are a major cause of hospital admission and mortality (Ranasinghe et al., 2012). The need to address those local problems explains the dominance of health-related research projects, but the Sri Lanka research community needs to improve both productivity and impact according to Ranasinghe et al. (2012). It is likely that similar concerns exist in other disciplines of science in Sri Lanka.

The barriers and challenges to research in this developing nation from the Indian subcontinent are likely to be shared with neighbouring countries with similar socio-economic backgrounds, like India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal. Therefore, our bibliometric evaluation of research productivity in Sri Lanka can help provide an insight in to the impact, productivity and trends in scientific publications in South Asia, home to nearly quarter of the world’s population.

There are so few studies of general science in Sri Lanka, that there are no controversial hypotheses or general trends that can be discussed, so we decided to establish, with this report, a baseline of comprehensive data for the country’s science. Our goal here it to assess total scientific performance and impact; most productive institutions and authors; favoured journals, most productive subject categories, and extent of national or international collaboration. We basically report that Sri Lanka is not different from other tropical countries, having a limited scope of research fields and an undesirable dependence on foreign projects.

The main limitation of this study is that it only considers data from the Science Citation Index (expanded version), which is highly biased against countries outside North America and Europe and fails to cover most Sri Lanka publications which nevertheless must be read, cited and generally important for the country and nearby areas.

Materials and methods

Data were generated from the Science Citation Index Expanded online version, the Web of Science Core Collection database, and Clarivate Analytics. We used this, and not another database, because it is very selective and is the base with which we are familiar and for which we have adjusted our long-term research project. We used an advanced search method to extract publications with the word “Sri Lanka” in the country field, to search for publications between 1973 and 2019. The search was performed on 11 August 2020 by one author (Y.S.H.). The SCI-EXPANDED records and the number of citations in each year per publication were coded manually in Microsoft Excel (method details in Li & Ho, 2008). Data were checked by the local authors (P.R. and C.K.L.) to remove incorrect and duplicated data.

To explore the citation rate in a publication, indicators such as C 2019 , TC 2019 , and CPP 2019 (defined below) were used in the present analysis. The number of citations in the Web of Science Core Collection varies with time. Hence, Ho’s group proposed TC year (Chuang et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011), total number of citations in the Web of Science Core Collection since publication year to the end of the most recent year, for example 2019 in this study (TC 2019 ). This indicator makes total citations a constant, which can be repeated and checked (Ho & Fu, 2016). Hence, TC 2019 was defined as the total number of citations since publication by the end of 2019. Citations per publication (CPP 2019 ) was defined as total citations (TC 2019 ) per number of total publications (TP) (CPP 2019 = TC 2019 /TP). In addition, C 2019 , the total number of citations only in 2019, was also evaluated. This measures the influence of an article in the current year (Ho, 2012). The advantage of using TC year and C year is that they ensure the repeatability of results compared to the use of index of citation directly from the Web of Science Core Collection (Fu et al., 2012). Furthermore, it has also been pointed out that it may not be appropriate to use a single indicator to evaluate the impact of an article (Ho & Hartley, 2016). For example, researchers should pay more attention to articles with a high C year and not only to those with high TC year alone, because some highly cited articles of the past with a high TC year may not have had the same high impact in the recent years (Ho & Hartley, 2016).

The impact factors (IF 2019 ) of the journals were taken from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) which was published in 2019. Affiliation re-classification was done as described below to ensure consistency regarding the origin of all publications, as per recommended standards. Affiliations in England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales, and Anguilla were reclassified as being from the United Kingdom (UK) (Chiu & Ho, 2005). Affiliations in Faroe Islands were reclassified as being from Denmark. Affiliations in French Guiana were reclassified as being from France. Affiliations in Hong Kong was reclassified to be in China (Fu et al., 2012). Affiliations in Fed Rep Ger (Federal Republic of Germany) were reclassified to be in Germany. Affiliations in Yemen Peo Dem R (Democratic Republic of Yemen) were reclassified to be in Yemen. Affiliations in Czechoslovakia were checked and reclassified to be in Czech Republic (Lin & Ho, 2015). Affiliations in Senegambia were checked and reclassified to be in Gambia. Affiliations in USSR and Rep of Georgia were checked and reclassified to be in Georgia (Republic of Georgia). In addition, Affiliations in Austl. were reclassified to be in Australia. Similarly, Czechoslovak Acad Sci (Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences) were checked and reclassified as being the Czech Acad Sci (Czech Republic Academy of Sciences). A potential bias in analysis of institutions occur when authors use different spellings for the same institution. Therefore, we merged these institutions during analysis (Fu et al., 2014). For example, Peradeniya Univ, Univ Peradeniya, Univ Peradeniya & Sri Lanka, Univ Peradeniya Kandy, Univ Peradeniya Sri Lanka, Univ Peradeniyai; articles published under these institutional names were merged together under the University of Peradeniya.

Publications were further analysed based on collaboration, first, and corresponding authorship. Ten types based on the above were evaluated including (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017a; Monge-Nájera et al., 2020) ; a) NFR: both first and corresponding authors are not from Sri Lanka, b) NR: corresponding author is not from Sri Lanka, c) NF: first author is not from Sri Lanka, d) IC: international collaboration, e) NC: national collaboration, f) II: institutional independent (single institutional articles), g) CI: Sri Lanka independent (only Sri Lanka authors), h) FP: first author is from Sri Lanka, i) RP: corresponding author is from Sri Lanka, and j) FR: both first and corresponding authors are from Sri Lanka. In the SCI-EXPANDED database, the corresponding author is labelled as reprint author, but in this study, we used the term corresponding author. Similarly, in a single institutional article, the institution was classified as the first as well as the corresponding author institution (Ho, 2014). Furthermore, in a single-author article where authorship is unspecified, the author was considered as both the first and corresponding author (Ho, 2014). Collaboration was evaluated by the affiliations of the authors in a publication, where ‘internationally collaborative articles’ were those articles co-authored by researchers from different countries other than Sri Lanka, while articles labelled ‘national collaborative article’ were those with authors from diverse institutions within Sri Lanka.

Results

Document type, language, year of publication and citation impact: A total of 16 069 publications with at least one author from Sri Lanka in SCI-EXPANDED was found within 19 document types (Appendix 1). The most common document type was articles (N = 12 298; 77 %) followed by the meeting abstracts (N = 2 025; 13 %). The 2 025 meeting abstracts were published in 253 journals, with the top three being Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (N = 161; 8.0 %), Vox Sanguinis (N = 120; 5.9 %), and BJOG-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (N = 104; 5.1 %). Reviews had 1.7 times more citations per publication (CPP 2019 ) than articles (Appendix 1). Three reviews had a TC 2019 of more than 1 000 including the review titled “The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC” (CMS Collaboration, 2008) (TC 2019 = 2 839), followed by “The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): A new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards” (Poff et al., 2010) (TC 2019 = 1 287); and “Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: A review” (Ahmad et al., 2014) (TC 2019 = 1 205).

Corrections had the highest number of authors per publication (APP) of 616 followed by articles with an APP of 116 (Appendix 1). Four articles had more than 5 000 authors; with the article titled “Combinations of single-top-quark production cross-section measurements and vertical bar | f LVVtb |determinations at = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments” (Aaboud et al., 2019) having the highest number of authors (N = 5 213 authors). Other large group collaborative publications with more than 5 000 authors were “Combined measurement of the higgs boson mass in pp collisions at √s = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments” (Aad et al., 2015) (N = 5 154 authors); “Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at = 7 and 8 TeV” (Aad et al., 2016) (N = 5 111 authors); and “Combination of inclusive and differential t charge asymmetry measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at = 7 and 8 TeV” (Aaboud et al., 2018) (N = 5 098 authors). Furthermore, 593 articles had more than 1 000 authors, and these were mainly published in the following journals; Journal of High Energy Physics (N = 184 articles; 31 % of 593 articles), Physics Letters B (N = 136; 23 %), European Physical Journal C (N = 93; 16 %), Physical Review D (N = 79; 13 %), and Physical Review Letters (N = 56; 9.4 %).

Only articles were considered for further analysis because they included complete research reports with methods, results, discussions, and conclusions. Almost all articles that reached this particular database (99.9 % of 12 298 articles) were published in English. The remaining non-English articles were published in German (N = 5), French (N = 2), Spanish (N = 2), and Dutch (N = 1).

The earliest article with a Sri Lanka author in SCI-EXPANDED was published in 1973 (Fig. 1). From 1973 to 2002, less than 200 articles were included each year. A gradual increase is seen from 1973 with 51 articles to 2002 with 191 articles, followed by a sharp increase after 2002. The highest CPP 2019 of 42 was in 2012, which can be attributed to three “classic” articles by Murray et al. (2012) with TC 2019 of 4 568, Vos et al. (2012) with TC 2019 of 3 624, and Lozano et al. (2012) with TC 2019 of 2 854 (here, articles with a TC year of 1 000 or more are labelled “classic articles” following Long et al., 2014).

Fig. 1 Trends of articles and citations per publication from 1973 to 2019. 

Collaboration patterns: countries and institutions: Internationally collaborative articles (IC) received higher citations per publication (CPP 2019 ), than national independent articles (II), or national collaborative articles (NC) (Fig. 2). Furthermore, articles with a first author and/or corresponding author from other countries tend to receive much higher CPP 2019 than those with a first author and/or corresponding author from Sri Lanka institutions (Fig. 2). There were 38 % of independent articles and 62 % of articles produced in collaboration with 188 countries; 56 % had a first or a corresponding author from Sri Lanka.

Fig. 2 Citations per publication and number of articles by type of collaboration and authorship. TP: total articles, NFR: both first- and corresponding-authors are not from Sri Lanka, NR: corresponding-author is not from Sri Lanka, NF: first-author is not from Sri Lanka, IC: international collaboration, NC: national collaboration, II: institutional independent, CI: Sri Lanka independent, FP: first-author is from Sri Lanka, RP: corresponding-author is from Sri Lanka, FR: both first- and corresponding-authors are from Sri Lanka. 

The UK was part of 19 % of collaborative articles, while the USA had the most first author articles (6.9 %) and corresponding author articles (6.4 %) (Appendix 2). Articles with Switzerland as first-author and corresponding author country had the highest CPP 2019 (78 and 84 citations, respectively).

Leading institutions and authors: In total, 3 076 (25 % of 12 298 articles) were single institution articles (II). There were 75 % inter-institutionally collaborative articles, including 17 % nationally collaborative articles (NC) and 83 % internationally collaborative articles (IC). The University of Peradeniya took the leading position for six publication indicators with 3 248 articles (26 %) which included: 727 institution independent articles, 2 004 inter-institutionally collaborative articles, 1 534 first author articles), 1 498 corresponding author articles), and 194 single-author articles (Appendix 3). The University of Colombo had the highest number of nationally collaborative articles (559). However, the International Water Management Institute had the highest CPP 2019 values: 44, 46, and 68 for their first author (FP), corresponding author (RP), and single author (SP) articles, respectively (Appendix 3).

A total of 4 673 independent Sri Lanka articles (i.e. articles without any international collaborations) were published by 6 317 authors including 2 382 first authors, 1 760 corresponding authors, and 477 single authors. Considering non-internationally collaborative articles, K. Tennakone from the National Institute of Fundamental Studies was the most productive author with 154 articles (3.3 % of 4 673 articles), including 131 FP articles, 142 RP articles, and 31 SP articles (Appendix 4). Out of the FP articles, those by E.H. Karunanayake from University of Colombo had the highest CPP 2019 (90). N. Senanayake from University of Peradeniya had the highest CPP 2019 of 40 from among the RP articles. Single author articles by S.A.M. Kularatne from the University of Peradeniya had the highest CPP 2019 (77).

Journals and subject categories: The 12 298 articles were published in 3 051 journals across 177 Web of Science categories in SCI-EXPANDED (there were no articles in the category of logic). Among these, 1 415 journals (46 % of 3 051 journals) contained only one article; 19 % two, and 9.1 % three articles.

Sri Lanka published the most articles in the Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (IF 2019 = 0.378) with 389 articles (3.2 % of 12 298 articles), followed by Journal of High Energy Physics (IF 2019 = 5.875) with 185 articles, Physics Letters B (IF 2019 = 4.384) with 140; and PLoS One (IF 2019 = 2.740) with 132 articles. A total of 185 articles published in the Journal of High Energy Physics had the highest number of authors per article (APP) with 2 276 authors, followed by the Journal of Instrumentation (15 articles; APP = 2 268), European Physical Journal C (95 articles; APP = 2 198), Physical Review Letters (59 articles; APP = 2 177) and Physics Letters B (140 articles; APP = 2 175).

Articles published in BioScience (IF 2019 = 8.282) had the highest number of citations per publication (CPP 2019 = 1 339), from the “classic” article “Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas” (Spalding et al., 2007) with a TC 2019 of 1 339. This is followed by JAMA Oncology with IF 2019 of 24.799 (2 articles; CPP 2019 = 728), Trends in Parasitology with IF 2019 of 6.918 (1 article; CPP 2019 = 609), and Lancet with IF 2019 of 60.392 (66 articles; CPP 2019 = 604). New England Journal of Medicine (IF 2019 = 74.699) published the 10 articles with the highest IF 2019 . Sri Lanka also published articles in other high impact journals, such as the Lancet (IF 2019 = 60.392; 66 articles).

The category of public, environmental and occupational health, with 193 journals, published the most Sri Lanka articles (829 articles; 6.7 % of 12 298 articles) followed by the environmental sciences (814), and multidisciplinary sciences (725) (Appendix 5). In 2019, the categories Environmental sciences (TP = 814, rank 2nd), Multidisciplinary sciences (TP = 725, rank 3rd), Particles and fields physics (TP = 513, rank 8th), and Public, environmental and occupational health (TP = 829, rank 1st) were the top four productive categories (Appendix 6).

Most cited articles: The “classic” or most cited articles in this database are detailed in Appendix 7, Appendix 8 and Appendix 9; of these, 12 were published in the 2010s and only two in the 2000s. All resulted from smaller Sri Lanka collaborations within large international projects with 2 to 89 participating countries, and Sri Lanka scientists were not first or corresponding authors. Eleven of these articles were published in Lancet, and one each in BioScience, New England Journal of Medicine, Climate Research, and JAMA Oncology.

The earliest classic article was published in 2002 by authors from University of Oxford and University of East Anglia in the UK, and the International Water Management Institute in Sri Lanka, it had a TC 2019 of 1 445 (rank 9th) and C 2019 of 76 (rank 50th). Nine classic articles ranked among the top 15 in both TC 2019 and C 2019 . In addition, 12 of the 15 classic articles dealt with general and internal medicine, while one article each was published in oncology, biology, environmental sciences, and meteorology and atmospheric sciences. Citation histories for the top classic articles appear in Appendix 7 and Appendix 8.

Discussion

In this first comprehensive bibliometric analysis of Sri Lanka scientific research publications in SCI-EXPANDED, we describe the country’s overall research productivity and impact, whilst identifying the most productive research institutions and authors. Furthermore, our results show the importance of collaborative research, especially in international mega-projects, to produce high impact values in this database.

Most Sri Lanka publications in the database were full paper articles, which is consistent with findings from other countries, such as Costa Rica (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2012), Ghana (Boamah & Ho, 2018) and Brunei (Ho et al., 2018). Article dominance generally reflects the fact that authors are encouraged by their institutions to publish them, as opposed to comments, letters, and book reviews, this is done with incentives for career advance and direct, or indirect, financial benefits (Boamah & Ho, 2018). The focus on articles, in turn, may represent a bias because it means that trends affecting other types of publications cannot be identified by our analysis.

The second commonest document type was meeting abstracts, in a proportion that is higher in Sri Lanka than what in Costa Rica (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2012) and Brunei (5.9 %) (Ho et al., 2018), for example, although it is similar to the proportion found in the African country of Ghana (Boamah & Ho, 2018). However, when research is presented as a conference abstract, it does not provide a complete representation of the research methods and findings, and is not fully peer-reviewed. Therefore, authors should receive incentives and support to later publish their meeting abstracts as full articles (we do not have data on the percentage of abstracts subsequently published as articles).

Sri Lanka’s articles included in the SCI-EXPANDED were mostly in English, similar to other countries around the world (Bah et al., 2019; Boamah & Ho, 2018; Ho et al., 2018; Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2012). On the island, most people speak Sinhalese or Tamil (Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka, 2020), but, while English is understood by a quarter of the population, the database language bias could hinder academic publishing in Sri Lanka and similar countries, because of a “linguistic injustice” where non-native speakers of English face substantial challenges in the dissemination of scholarly work (Politzer-Ahles et al., 2016).

Sri Lanka was formerly known as Ceylon and only became a republic, adopting its current name in 1972, at the time that we find the earliest article with a Sri Lanka author in the SCI-EXPANDED. From that time onwards, there was only a modest increase until 2002 until reaching a rapid upsurge since 2010. The reasons for this increase are likely to be multifactorial: government policies (Pratheepan & Weerasooriya, 2016) as well as an in the interest of the database itself in covering “third world” countries when growth stopped in industrialized nations.

In recent years, Ho’s group proposed a relationship between country publication types (based on collaboration and authorship status) and their citations per publication, to evaluate their impact (Chuang & Ho, 2015). The results show that internationally collaborative articles from Sri Lanka received a higher CPP 2019 , than institutionally independent or nationally collaborative articles; and this reflects the fact that local projects have much smaller budgets and do not have access to the journals of countries that are better covered by the database we used. Furthermore, articles with a first author and/or corresponding author from other countries received a much higher CPP 2019 for the same reason.

Similar results have been observed when the same analysis has been applied to other developing countries, such as Benin (Monge-Nájera et al., 2020), Brunei (Ho et al., 2018), Ecuador (Calahorrano et al., 2020), Honduras (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017a), El Salvador (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017b), Ghana (Boamah & Ho, 2018), Guatemala (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2018), and Nicaragua (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017c).

Well financed international collaborative projects (1) enable the sharing of new techniques, skills, knowledge and high-end facilities, synergising expertise and producing articles with many authors and wider exposure in large journals, and (2) often study pressing health issues, therefore they are more likely to have more citations and should be encouraged when done on a fair basis (Glänzel, 2001; Khor & Yu, 2016). Conversely, the lowest impact of local authors in this particular database indicates smaller resources and insufficient coverage in this database of journals published in Asia and other less industrialized regions.

Our results also show that publications from Sri Lanka had a higher CPP 2019 than countries with similar socio-economic status, such as Guatemala (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2018), Benin (Monge-Nájera et al., 2020), Ecuador (Calahorrano et al., 2020), Ghana (Boamah & Ho, 2018), El Salvador (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017b), and Brunei (Ho et al., 2018). Possible reasons include a larger presence of Sri Lanka in international megaprojects or more coverage of Asia, over Latin America, in this database (Smith et al., 2014). Additionally, factors affected citation in this database include a) article related factors: quality, novelty, subject area, study topic and study design, b) journal related factors: language, scope and form of publication, and c) author related factors: number, reputation, collaborations and country (Tahamtan et al., 2016). Most of those factors have been also identified in Sri Lanka medical research (Annalingam et al., 2014), and might affect the trend found here. Furthermore, the SCI-EXPANDED has a poor coverage of Sri Lanka journals, and most authors published articles in the Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (Ranasinghe et al., 2011; Ranasinghe et al., 2012).

We found that, in Sri Lanka, public universities were the most prolific institutions, and this was similar to what has been found in other developing countries, including Cameroon (Tchuifon Tchuifon et al., 2017), Costa Rica (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2012), El Salvador (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017b) and Nicaragua (Monge-Nájera, & Ho, 2017a). Universities by definition are expected to be institutions of higher learning providing facilities for both teaching and research, where academic scholars/researchers receive recognition, promotion and funding for future research through their publications (Pratheepan & Weerasooriya, 2016). Hence, it is not surprising that Sri Lanka universities are in the forefront of research publications in the country. Even in developed countries like Germany, the world’s third largest producer of scientific research, universities have consistently produced two-thirds of the publications in the highest quality journals (Dusdal et al., 2020).

A relationship of percentage of publications in a country and number of journals in each Web of Science category has been proposed (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017a; Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017c), and when we applied it to Sri Lanka, we found that the island published most articles in the category of public, environmental and occupational health. This was similar to Honduras (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017a), El Salvador (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017b), and Nicaragua (Monge-Nájera & Ho, 2017c) in Central America; and Ghana (Boamah & Ho, 2018) in Africa. However, Brunei (Ho et al., 2018) in Asia published the most articles in the category of ecology, showing another trend which is the emphasis on conservation in countries where basic health issues have been controlled to some extent. In the case of Sri Lanka, the health situation (Gunawardene, 1999; Ranasinghe et al., 2012) explains why research efforts are concentrated in health, an area of national priority.

In conclusion, Sri Lanka authors publish mainly in the area of public, environmental and occupational health, reflecting the priorities of the country. The impact of Sri Lanka research articles is highest when published as part of international collaborative project where, unfortunately, they only play a secondary role and the leaders are well-funded researchers from large industrialized countries. Sri Lanka policy makers must find a balance between the two options of focusing support on the most prolific authors and institutions identified in this study; or focusing on emerging researchers and institutions that are less likely to obtain foreign funds. Sri Lanka authors should be encouraged to (1) expand their horizons beyond short-term goals, i.e. researching non-applied fields that are the basis of all innovation; (2) to strengthen their own journals so that they have better visibility and impact, and (3) to additionally publish more in large international journals as part of teams where they are also among the leaders instead of just accepting secondary roles.

Ethical statement: the authors declare that they all agree with this publication and made significant contributions; that there is no conflict of interest of any kind; and that we followed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures and requirements. All financial sources are fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgements section. A signed document has been filed in the journal archives.

See Digital Appendix

Acknowledgments

We thank Carolina Seas for her valuable assistance with manuscript preparation.

References

Aaboud, M., Aad, G., Abbott, B., Abbott, D. C., Abdinov, O., Abud, A. A., Abhayasinghe, D. K., Abidi, S. H., AbouZeid, O. S., Abraham, N. L., Abramowicz, H., Abreu, H., Abulaiti, Y., Acharya, B. S., Adachi, S., Adam, L., Adamczyk, L., Adamek, L., Adelman, J., … Zwalinski, N. (2019). Combinations of single-top-quark production cross-section measurements and vertical bar fLVVtbdeterminations at = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS experiments. Journal of High Energy Physics, 5, 1-81. [ Links ]

Aaboud, M., Aad, G., Abbott, B., Abdinov, O., Abeloos, B., Abidi, S. H., AbouZeid, O. S., Abraham, N. L., Abramowicz, H., Abreu, H., Abulaiti, Y., Acharya, B. S., Adachi, S., Adamczyk, L., Adelman, J., Adersberger, M., Adye, T., Affolder, A. A., Afik, Y., … Yuen, S. P. Y. (2018). Combination of inclusive and differential t charge asymmetry measurements using ATLAS and CMS data at = 7 and 8 TeV. Journal of High Energy Physics, 4, 1-68. [ Links ]

Aad, G., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Abdinov, O., Abeloos, B., Aben, R., AbouZeid, O. S., Abraham, N. L., Abramowicz, H., Abreu, H., Abreu, R., Abulaiti, Y., Acharya, B. S., Adamczyk, L., Adams, D. L., Adelman, J., Adomeit, S., Adye, T., Affolder, A. A., … Zwalinski, L. (2016), Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at = 7 and 8 TeV. Journal of High Energy Physics, 8, 2-104. [ Links ]

Aad, G., Abbott, B., Abdallah, J., Abdinov, O., Aben, R., Abolins, M., AbouZeid, O. S., Abramowicz, H., Abreu, H., Abreu, R., Abulaiti, Y., Acharya, B. S., Adamczyk, L., Adams, D. L., Adelman, J., Adomeit, S., Adye, T., Affolder, A. A., Agatonovic-Jovin, T., … Woods, N. (2015). Combined measurement of the higgs boson mass in pp collisions at = 7 and 8 TeV with the ATLAS and CMS Experiments. Physical Review Letters, 114(19), 191803. [ Links ]

Ahmad, M., Rajapaksha, A. U., Lim, J. E., Zhang, M., Bolan, N., Mohan, D., Vithanage, M., Lee, S. S., & Ok, Y. S. (2014). Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. Chemosphere, 99, 19-33. [ Links ]

Annalingam, A., Damayanthi, H., Jayawardena, R., & Ranasinghe, P. (2014). Determinants of the citation rate of medical research publications from a developing country. SpringerPlus, 3(1), 1-6. [ Links ]

Añino, Y. J., Monge-Nájera, J., Murillo-González, D., & Michán-Aguirre, L. (2021). Cómo aplicar la cienciometría a la investigación ecológica. Ecosistemas, 30(2), 2256-2257. [ Links ]

Bah, K., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2019). Gambia publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: bibliometrics of institutions and subjects. Revista de Biología Tropical, 67, 490-500. [ Links ]

Boamah, P. O., & Ho, Y. S. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of Ghana publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Revista de Biología Tropical , 66, 106-121. [ Links ]

Calahorrano, L., Monge-Nájera, J., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2020). Ecuador publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: institutions, subjects, citation and collaboration patterns. Revista de Biología Tropical , 68(1), 98-107. [ Links ]

Chiu, W. T., & Ho, Y. S. (2005). Bibliometric analysis of homeopathy research during the period of 1991 to 2003. Scientometrics, 63(1), 3-23. [ Links ]

Chuang, K. Y., & Ho, Y. S. (2015). An evaluation based on highly cited publications in Taiwan. Current Science, 108(5), 933-941. [ Links ]

Chuang, K. Y., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). High-impact papers presented in the subject category of water resources in the essential science indicators database of the institute for scientific information. Scientometrics, 87(3), 551-562. [ Links ]

CMS Collaboration. (2008). The CMS experiment at the CERN LHC. Journal of Instrumentation, 3(8), S08004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/3/08/S08004 [ Links ]

Department of Census and Statistics of Sri Lanka. (2020). Statistical Pocket Book 2020. Department of Census and Statistics. http://www.statistics.gov.lk/Pocket%20BookLinks ]

Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: Quality measurements of scientific publication. Radiology, 255(2), 342-351. [ Links ]

Dusdal, J., Powell, J. J. W., Baker, D. P., Fu, Y. C., Shamekhi, Y., & Stock, M. (2020). University vs. research institute? The Dual Pillars of German Science production, 1950-2010. Minerva, 58(3), 319-342. [ Links ]

Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of China in Science Citation Index Expanded during 1980-2011. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 210-222. [ Links ]

Fu, H. Z., Long, X., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). China’s research in chemical engineering journals in Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 98(1), 119-136. [ Links ]

Fu, H. Z., Wang, M. H., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). The most frequently cited adsorption research articles in the Science Citation Index (Expanded). Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 379(1), 148-156. [ Links ]

Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115. [ Links ]

Gunawardene, N. (1999). Sri Lanka’s double burden kills rich and poor alike. Health for the Millions, 25(4), 27. [ Links ]

Ho, Y. S. (2012). Top-cited articles in chemical engineering in Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 20(3), 478-488. [ Links ]

Ho, Y. S. (2014). A bibliometric analysis of highly cited articles in materials science. Current Science, 107, 1565-1572. [ Links ]

Ho, Y. S., & Fu, H. Z. (2016). Mapping of metal-organic frameworks publications: A bibliometric analysis. Inorganic Chemistry Communications, 73, 174-182. [ Links ]

Ho, Y. S., & Hartley, J. (2016). Classic articles published by American Scientists (1900-2014): A bibliometric analysis. Current Science, 111, 1156-1165. [ Links ]

Ho, Y. S., Lim, L. B. L., & Monge-Nájera, J. (2018). Brunei publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded (1973-2016): Bibliometrics and comparison with other tropical countries. Revista de Biología Tropical , 66(3), 1090-1100. [ Links ]

Ivanović, D., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). Independent publications from Serbia in the Science Citation Index Expanded: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 101(1), 603-622. [ Links ]

Khor, K. A., & Yu, L. G. (2016). Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1095-1110. [ Links ]

Li, Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2008). Use of citation per publication as an indicator to evaluate contingent valuation research. Scientometrics, 75(1), 97-110. [ Links ]

Lin, C. L., & Ho, Y. S. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of publications on pluripotent stem cell research. Cell Journal, 17(1), 59-70. [ Links ]

Long, X., Huang, J. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2014). A historical review of classic articles in surgery field. American Journal of Surgery, 208(5), 841-849. [ Links ]

Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Foreman, K., Lim, S., Shibuya, K., Aboyans, V., Abraham, J., Adair, T., Aggarwal, R., Ahn, S. Y., AlMazroa, M. A., Alvarado, M., Anderson, H. R., Anderson, L. M., Andrews, K. G., Atkinson, C., Baddour, L. M., Barker-Collo, S., Bartels, D. H., ... Murray, C. J. L. (2012). Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2095-2128. [ Links ]

Lucio-Arias, D., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). An indicator of research front activity: Measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2488-2498. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2012). Costa Rica publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: A bibliometric analysis for 1981-2010. Revista de Biología Tropical , 60(4), 1649-1661. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2017a). Honduras publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: institutions, fields and authors. Revista de Biología Tropical , 65(2), 657-668. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2017b). El Salvador publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: subjects, authorship, collaboration and citation patterns. Revista de Biología Tropical , 65(4), 1428-1436. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2017c). Bibliometrics of Nicaraguan publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded. Revista de Biología Tropical , 65(2), 643-655. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., & Ho, Y. S. (2018). Guatemala articles in the Science Citation Index Expanded: bibliometry of subjects, collaboration, institutions and authors. Revista de Biología Tropical , 66(1), 312-320. [ Links ]

Monge-Nájera, J., Mêgnigbêto, E., & Ho, Y. S. (2020), Research impact and productivity of Benin according to the Science Citation Index Expanded (1973 to 2018). Revista de Biología Tropical , 68(3), 909-918. [ Links ]

Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J. A., Abdalla, S., Aboyans, V., Abraham, J., Ackerman, I., Aggarwal, R., Ahn, S. Y., Ali, M. K., AlMazroa, M. A., Alvarado, M., Anderson, H. R., … Rivero, A. P. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2197-2223. [ Links ]

Poff, N. L., Richter, B. D., Arthington, A. H., Bunn, S. E., Naiman, R. J., Kendy, E., Acreman, M., Apse, C., Bledsoe, B., Freeman, M. C., Henriksen, J., Jacobson, R. B., Kennen, J. G., Merritt, D. M., O’keefee, J. H., Olden, J. D., Rodgers, K., Tharme, R. E., & Warner, A. (2010). The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshwater Biology, 55(1), 147-170. [ Links ]

Politzer-Ahles, S., Holliday, J. J., Girolamo, T., Spychalska, M. & Berkson, K. H. (2016). Is linguistic injustice a myth? A response to Hyland (2016). Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 3-8. [ Links ]

Pratheepan, T., & Weerasooriya, W. (2016). The Publication Output and Impact of various Faculties in Sri Lankan Universities: a Scientometric Assessment and Policy Implications. Journal of the University Librarians Association of Sri Lanka, 19, 54-70. [ Links ]

Ranasinghe, P., Jayawardena, R., & Katulanda, P. (2012). Sri Lanka in global medical research: A scientific analysis of the Sri Lankan research output during 2000-2009. BMC Research Notes, 5(1), 1-8. [ Links ]

Ranasinghe, P., Perera, Y. S., & Abeygunasekara, A. M. (2011). The process and costs of publishing medical journals in Sri Lanka: An economic evaluation. BMJ Open, 1(1), e000057. [ Links ]

Rousseau, R. (2014). Forgotten founder of bibliometrics. Nature, 510(7504), 218. [ Links ]

Smith, M. J., Weinberger, C., Bruna, E. M., & Allesina, S. (2014). The scientific impact of nations: journal placement and citation performance. PLoS One, 9(10), e109195. [ Links ]

Spalding, M. D., Fox, H. E., Allen, G. R., Davidson, N., Ferdaña, Z. A., Finlayson, M., Halpern, B. S., Jorge, M. A., Lombana, A., Lourie, S. A., Martin, K. D., McManus, E., Molnar, J., Recchia, C. A., & Robertson, J. (2007). Marine Ecoregions of the World: A Bioregionalization of Coastal and Shelf Areas. BioScience, 57(7), 573-583. [ Links ]

Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: A comprehensive review of the literature. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195-1225. [ Links ]

Tchuifon Tchuifon, D., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2017). Cameroon publications in the Science Citation Index Expanded: Bibliometric analysis. Revista de Biología Tropical , 65(4), 1582-1591. [ Links ]

Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., Shibuya, K., Salomon, J. A., Abdalla, S., Aboyans, V., Abraham, J., Ackerman, I., Aggarwal, R., Ahn, S. Y., Ali, M. K., AlMazroa, M. A., Alvarado, M., Anderson, H. R., Anderson, L. M., … Murray, C. J. L. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2163-2196. [ Links ]

Wang, M. H., Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2011). Comparison of universities’ scientific performance using bibliometric indicators. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 16, 1-19 [ Links ]

Received: June 15, 2021; Revised: October 19, 2021; Accepted: January 18, 2022

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License