Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics
Related links
- Similars in SciELO
Share
Acta Médica Costarricense
On-line version ISSN 0001-6002Print version ISSN 0001-6012
Acta méd. costarric vol.55 suppl.1 San José Jul. 2013
Resúmenes de conferencias magistrales
Avances en el conocimiento de los principales vectores de Rickettsia en Latinoamérica
(Advances in the knowledge of the principal vectors of Rickettsia in
Santiago Nava
Las garrapatas son ectoparásitos hematófagos causantes de perjuicios por el parasitismo per se o por la transmisión de agentes patógenos que pueden provocar enfermedades en animales y humanos. Dentro de este grupo de parásitos, tres de las especies con mayor importancia sanitaria son Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato, Amblyomma cajennense y Amblyomma triste. Estudios recientes han demostrado que los taxones R. sanguineus s.s y A. cajennense en realidad constituyen complejos de especies. Particularmente en Sudamérica, existen evidencias que indican que el complejo R. sanguineus está formado por al menos dos especies, mientras que A. cajennense es un complejo de la menos seis especies. Amblyomma cajennense ha sido incriminada como una de las especies con mayor relevancia sanitaria no solo por el efecto deletéreo causado por el parasitismo per se, sino también por su capacidad para transmitir agentes patógenos a los humanos. Una de las enfermedades en la que las garrapatas del complejo A. cajenense se constituyen en el principal vector es la fiebre manchada por Rickettsia rickettsii. Esta es la rickettsiosis humana transmitida por garrapatas más importante de Latinoamérica. Ha sido reportada en México, Panamá, Costa Rica, Colombia, Brasil y Argentina, con casos fatales en la mayoría de estos países. Hasta el momento, todos los casos fatales por rickettsiosis en humanos reportados en Latinoamérica fueron provocados por R. rickettsii. Las garrapatas del complejo R. sanguineus pueden actuar como vectores y reservorios de Ehrlichia canis, el agente causal de la erlichiosis canina, y son también vectores potenciales de otros agentes rickettsiales como R. rickettsii, R. massiliae y Anaplasma platys. Este nuevo escenario taxonómico referido a A. cajennense s.s y R. sanguineus s.s conlleva implicancias ecológicas y epidemiológicas relacionadas a diferencias en la dinámica estacional, distribución y capacidad vectorial entre las especies que forman los dos complejos. Amblyomma triste es una garrapata filogenéticamente también presenta una amplia distribución, desde el sur de Estados Unidos al sur de Uruguay y centro de Argentina. Sin embargo, las poblaciones de A. triste involucradas en la transmisión de Rickettsia parkeri a humanos están restringidas a localidades de la Cuenca del Plata, en Argentina, Brasil y Uruguay. Estudios publicados recientemente y en curso han mostrado que A. triste presenta una distribución más amplia que la usualmente reconocida. Asimismo, se han establecido diferencias morfológicas asociadas a poblaciones con distinto origen geográfico. En esta presentación se detallan y discuten los avances mencionados sobre sistemática y ecología de estas tres garrapatas con importancia sanitaria en la región Neotropical.
Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Rafaela y Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina. nava.santiago@inta.gob.ar
Vigilancia de enfermedades rickettsiales en poblaciones animales
(Surveillance of rickettsial diseases in animal populations)
Adriano Pinter
The Brazilian Spotted Fever (BSF) is the most severe tick-borne-disease in
Detecting the presence of rickettsial agents in a tick population is a very important step to evaluate the risk that the human population is exposed in a determined local and an important surveillance tool to categorize areas in regard to the risk of disease transmission. This ought to be used by local public health services in order to focus efforts only upon the areas which are infested by infected ticks. Besides it can be used as a screening approach to areas where no information is available.
In order to categorize a specific area it is necessary to determine whether rickettsial agents are circulating among the ticks and whether it is pathogenic to humans or not. A direct survey for rickettsia on the tick population through techniques such as PCR or cell culture isolation is very assertive but is limited by a very high financial cost, thus it cannot be used in surveillance protocols for large areas, although it must be encouraged in research projects for rickettsial agents characterization.
Indirect protocols are a better choice for surveillance, specifically the serosurvey on sentinel vertebrate hosts. Since ticks are strict haematophagous parasites, the vertebrate hosts living in a specific area are highly exposed to that tick population and consequently to the rickettsial agents.
The elected vertebrate host species to take part of the survey must be primary hosts for that specific tick species found in this area. Part of the host population must be accessed in order to have a sample of blood individually collected, labeled and stocked until the moment of processing. The number of animals that must be tested depends on the size of the population and can be calculated by the simple random sample for prevalence determination, expect prevalence must be set up to 50%, significance to 95% and acceptable error to 10%.
Sera collected from sampled animals must be tested for presence of anti-Rickettsia antibodies through Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA), this technique depends on glass slides prepared with cell cultured Rickettsia. IFA test shows a cross reaction among all Rickettsia species from the spotted fever group. It is possible to determine the likely homologous reaction if each individual serum is tested against different Rickettsia species, if the title obtained against one species is four times higher than the other tested species, it is highly probable that it is an homologous reaction, whereas if just one or few species of Rickettsia is tested the positive outcome may only be informative to Spotted Fever Group Rickettsia.
The serosurvey outcome must be used to classify a restricted area in regards to the threat to the human population. Suggestions on area classification to vector-borne-diseases have been proposed for several authors, but most of those are intended to insect vectors and may not be suitable to tick vectors.
An example of this difference in terminology is the areas where the vector is well established but laboratory tests yielded negative for presence of pathogens. In case of insect-borne-diseases this area is classified as “predisposed” because insect vector complete several generation per year and can disperse very easily; therefore, populations can be overtaken or mixed with other migrant populations. On the other hand, most ticks complete one or two generations per year and ecology of the hosts and environment play a very important role to regulate the presence or absence of a pathogen, which makes tick populations more stable. Thus, the absence of a pathogen in a tick population may show that the ecological conditions that this population is exposed to might create a refractory profile to infection. In fact, when a tick population is found free of pathogenic rickettsial agents the question should not be “When will a rickettsial agent be introduced?” but rather, “What prevents this population from being infected for so long?”. An exception may be the tick species Rhipicephalus sanguineus, because this species is extremely anthropophilic and population of this tick can rise very fast and be suitable to have rickettsial agent introduced in by hosts that are also fed on by native tick species, such as hunting dogs that go into forests and dwell nearby or in human houses, which may cause an epizootic profile and eventually human infection, but this situation is not natural and especially different from the expected behavior of New World endemic tick species.
As a result, the terminology “predisposed areas” might not be used, but “alert areas” is suggested instead.
The full classification for areas created upon serosurvey results in regards to tick-borne-rickettsial agents is suggested below:
-”Silence areas”, when no information about presence or absence of tick species is known.
-”Non-infested areas”, when repeated searches for ticks yielded negative.
-”Alert areas”, presence of competent vector tick species but absence of a pathogenic rickettsial agent.
-”Risk areas”, presence of competent vector tick species and presence of a pathogenic rickettsial agent, but no human cases of disease have been reported.
-”Transmission areas”, presence of competent vector tick species, presence of a pathogenic rickettsial agent, and human cases of disease have been reported within the last five years.
To confirm a specific area as a “Risk Area”, the seropositive prevalence threshold value for a sampled group of animal depends of some variables such as the average age and animal species, and the higher the average title obtained by the IFA the higher the chance of a recent rickettsial epizootic event. Different studies on dogs and horses in South-eastern
The parameters of a surveillance program must be determined specifically for each Country and ought to be an important research focus for the forthcoming years.
Superintendência de Controle de Endemias - SUCEN, Brasil. apinter@sucen.sp.gov.br
Ecología de las rickettsiosis en America Latina
(Ecology of spotted fever rickettsioses in
Marcelo B. Labruna
Spotted fever rickettsioses are caused by bacteria of the genus Rickettsia, which are primarily transmitted to humans through the bite of infected ticks. These bacteria belong to the so called spotted fever group (SFG), currently composed by over 20 valid species distributed through the world. While some SFG species are agents of human illness (SFG rickettsioses), others have been described only from ticks, and are considered non-pathogenic or of unknown pathogenicity. In
Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Saúde Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo,Brasil. apinter@sucen.sp.gov.brlabruna@usp.br