SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.19 número1Dispositivo electrónico automático usado para la evaluación de la resistencia a la fatiga cíclica de instrumentos de Niquel-TitanioModificaciones dentales precolombinas en Costa Rica: Estudio de tres sitios arqueológicos índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Odovtos International Journal of Dental Sciences

versión On-line ISSN 2215-3411versión impresa ISSN 1659-1046

Resumen

ZAVALA-ALONSO, V.; ROQUE-MARQUEZ, G; PATINO-MARIN, N  y  SILVA-HERZOG, D. Characterization of Fluorotic Enamel After Microabrasion and Desensitizing Agent. Odovtos [online]. 2017, vol.19, n.1, pp.59-68. ISSN 2215-3411.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/ijds.v0i0.27998.

Introduction. Enamel microabrasion is a procedure used for removing a superficial layer of enamel that has some alteration of color and/or texture caused by dental fluorosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the microhardness and micromorphology of the fluorotic enamel surface after microabrasion with 6.6% hydrochloric acid and silica or 18% hydrochloric acid and evaluate the effect of desensitizing agent exposure on the treated enamel. Materials and Methods. Twenty anterior teeth with moderate fluorosis were divided into two groups: 1) Perla-Dent® group and 2) Opalustre® group. Each buccal surface of incisors was sectioned to obtain samples 3x3 mm. The samples were then mounted in acrylic blocks. The enamel surface of the blocks was polished, after the microabrasion materials and desensitizing agent were applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. All samples were analyzed by Vickers microhardness tester and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. Both experimental groups presented a decrease in the microhardness values, with statistically significant differences (p<0.0001) when comparing the baseline and after treatments values. To compare the microhardness values after both microabrasion and desensitizing treatment in the study groups, it was observed that the Perla-Dent® group obtained lower values than the Opalescence® group with a statistically significant difference (p<0.0001). The representative images of study groups in SEM showed the enamel surface morphology after Perla-Dent® treatment more irregular and a very marked relief than that observed in enamel surface morphology after Opalustre® treatment. Conclusion. The surface of the enamel was more affected with Perla-Dent® treatment than with Opalustre® treatment and the placement of UltraEz® agent does not recover its baseline microhardness.

Palabras clave : Dental fluorosis; Fluorotic enamel; Microabrasion; Desensitizing agent; Microhardness; Surface morphology.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )