SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Movimientos reivindicativos en el Capitalismo: Algunos comentarios para su discusiónReflexiones sobre la génesis del Himno al árbol índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Comunicación

versión On-line ISSN 1659-3820versión impresa ISSN 0379-3974

Resumen

ARAGON, Luis Fernando. Who is Responsible for the Resistance to the Advancement of Science?. Comunicación [online]. 2023, vol.32, n.2, pp.119-124. ISSN 1659-3820.

In this paper the resistance to the progress of science is briefly analyzed. The blame for suppressing the rapid advancement of science has traditionally been laid on various institutions such as the State (by not providing sufficient economic resources), and the Church (by opposing new treatments or procedures), or even the legitimate or unfounded fears of the population. Having recalled a few examples from the history of medicine, physiology, and astronomy, it is suggested that the main opposition to the progress of science necessarily comes from within its ranks. The need for a gradual questioning of novel ideas is justified while warning against excessive resistance. Some examples of resistance originating in religion are also presented, antagonism that may or may not be justified. Interestingly, in these examples, significant opposition from science itself has also been identified. In conclusion, the opposition to changing existing paradigms and embracing progress may be an inherent quality of science rather than a deficiency of religion or other institutions.

Palabras clave : History of science; Philosophy; Religion; Human physiology; public health; Epistemology.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )