SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.101 número2Argentina Trabaja: análisis territorial desde la Economía Social y Solidaria en MendozaLa evolución del Programa Ellas Hacen como política social argentina con pretendido enfoque de género índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Reflexiones

versión On-line ISSN 1659-2859versión impresa ISSN 1021-1209

Resumen

OJEDA GUTIERREZ, Jonathan  y  CORTES CARRENO, José Cruz Jorge. Indigenous subject and masculinity: a dialogue on the intersections between gender and ethnicity. Reflexiones [online]. 2022, vol.101, n.2, pp.77-98. ISSN 1659-2859.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rr.v101i2.45068.

Introduction: Studies on masculinities in Latin America have diversified their thematic axes and one of them is related to ethno-racial issues. This article presents an analysis of the masculinization of the indigenous subject, a topic that needs to be addressed and discussed in conjunction with other theoretical corpus to understand that ethnicity and gender are categories related and linked to historical processes.

Objective: The objective is to present a proposal to broaden the interpretations about the masculinization of the indigenous subject, by carrying out a relational approach between gender and ethnicity, primary categories in the social and subjective construction of masculinities.

Method: A hermeneutical exercise is developed from the gender perspective to delve into the interpretive act on the understanding of indigenous masculinities as a social, historical and complex construction. Emphasis is placed on historicity to have a situated approach that allows explaining that the generic construction of the subject is reminiscent of the history that is manifested in the present.

Results: It is emphasized that, since masculinity is a complex phenomenon, a dialogue is required with other theoretical proposals that make it possible to broaden the understanding of the masculinization of the indigenous subject. For example, with decolonial feminism or intersectionality to have a situated approach to the phenomenon of masculinity.

Conclusions: The openness to difference is a key element that allows expanding the hermeneutical act on the masculinization of the indigenous subject. For this reason, the articulation with other epistemic resources allows us to understand that gender learning is complex and diverse, when reading from the parameters of each society.

Palabras clave : Intersectionality; Genealogy; Decolonial feminism; Coloniality of gender; Studies of masculinities.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )