SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número2Suplementación de extracto de Cynara scolymus L. y betaína en cerdas durante la lactanciaDistribución de Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae) en zonas de producción citrícola de Panamá índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Agronomía Mesoamericana

versión On-line ISSN 2215-3608versión impresa ISSN 1659-1321

Resumen

PARRA-FORERO, Diana; MAYORGA MOGOLLON, Olga  y  ARIZA-NIETO, Claudia. Comparison of fecal near-infrared with conventional methods to estimate intake and digestibility in sheep. Agron. Mesoam [online]. 2023, vol.34, n.2, 51436. ISSN 2215-3608.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/am.v34i2.51436.

Introduction. Intake and digestibility are parameters that define the quality of a forage; however, they are difficult and expensive to estimate. Near infrared spectroscopy technology applied to feces (NIRSf) is an alternative to conventional reference methods to estimate dry matter voluntary intake (DMVI) and digestibility (DMD) in sheep. Objective. To compare NIRSf technology with conventional methods for estimation of DMVI and DMD in confinement sheep. Materials and methods. Six bioassays were carried out at the Tibaitata research center, Cundinamarca, Colombia, during 2019 and 2021 with five sheep (LW 58.28±11 kg) to estimate DMVI and DMD by three methods: gravimetry, markers and NIRSf. The animals were fed six diets contrasting in their nutritional value. Forage and feces samples were collected, dried, and ground for subsequent chemical and spectral analysis. Results. The estimation of DMVI and DMD was different (p<0.001) in the six evaluated feeding regimenes, where the DMVIMW ranged from 37.54 to 82.58 g/kg LW0.75, and the DMD ranged from 36.32 to 58.81 %. In the comparison of the estimation of DMVI and DMD by the referent method (gravimetric) with marker and NIRSf methods, shows that the NIRSf method presented a better adjustment compared to the marker method, presenting less root mean square error value (-1.53 and -1.75, respectively), lower mean absolute error (-3.01 and -0.5, respectively), and higher determination coefficient (+0.09 and +0.28, respectively). Conclusion. The estimation of the DMVI and the DMD by means of the NIRSf equations presented a better fit compared to the marker method, however, it is necessary to improve the accuracy of the calibrations using feces samples from animals under different productive contexts.

Palabras clave : ruminants; forage; spectral analysis; feces; markers.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )