SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número2Las venas abiertas de América Latina en la era del antropoceno: un estudio biofísico del comercio exterior (1900-2016)Puerto Rico: El colapso de un país. Una reflexión sobre el debacle de la industria azucarera, las petroquímicas y la sección 936 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Diálogos Revista Electrónica de Historia

versión On-line ISSN 1409-469X

Resumen

ALARCON, Pedro. Latin american environmental thinking revisited: the polyphony of buen vivir. Diálogos rev. electr. hist [online]. 2020, vol.21, n.2, pp.215-236. ISSN 1409-469X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/dre.v21i2.39433.

Following the guiding thread of recent Ecuadorian economic history, this paper aims to mirror the evolution of environmental discourses across the Latin American region. During the last decades of the twentieth century, increasing social environmental awareness added up to the penetration of environmental thinking into the states’ developmental policymaking. For Ecuador, this cocktail resulted in the long-run in a particular discourse: Buen vivir. Central to rationalize buen vivir was its socioecological dimension, founded on a harmonic relationship between society and nature. Buen vivir was meant to materialize in a plan to save part of the Ecuadorian Amazonia from oil drilling by leaving a significant portion of the country’s reserves under the ground in exchange for an international monetary compensation: The Yasuní-ITT initiative. Despite the fact that the plan mobilized state and society, it succumbed to forty-years of oil dependence of Ecuadorian economy, politics, and society. The termination of the initiative unveiled two antagonist environmental discourses. Whereas the state held the notion of natural resources available for commodification in the global market, society bet on alternative meanings of nature such as natural heritage and ancient peoples’ habitat and means of existence.

As outcomes of the foreseeable divorce between the environmental discourses, buen vivir turned into a polyphonic concept and the struggle over a hegemonic environmental discourse resumed. It is argued that during the twenty-first century, one of the consequences of such a struggle is the construction of different meanings of development alike.

Palabras clave : Ecuador; good living; neo-extractivism; environmental discourse; nature; development.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )