SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.70 suppl.1Compensación dentro de la Evaluación Ambiental en la Secretaría Técnica Nacional Ambiental (SETENA), Costa RicaCompensación en un sistema fluvial: el caso del Río Parismina, Costa Rica índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista de Biología Tropical

versión On-line ISSN 0034-7744versión impresa ISSN 0034-7744

Resumen

SASA, Mahmood et al. Environmental compensation for the segregation and use of an area within a wildlife refuge: a case study using opportunity cost. Rev. biol. trop [online]. 2022, vol.70, suppl.1, e53556. ISSN 0034-7744.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v70is1.53556.

Introduction:

The establishment of the Las Tablillas Border Post implies the segregation of 12.12 ha within the National Wildlife Refuge Border Corridor (RNVSCF) in northern Costa Rica. The site has a long land use history, so its environment is highly degraded. This case can be studied from the opportunity cost, which refers to the amount of the alternative given up when making an economic decision.

Objective:

In this paper, we use this precept to assess the compensation for losses in habitat structure and biodiversity if succession dynamics within a protected wilderness area were interrupted.

Methods:

To find the net gain in compensation required by this segregation, we analyzed the diversity and composition of nearby forest cover to forecast the environment that would be lost if its conservation objectives were interrupted (opportunity cost). Compensating for these losses requires an equivalent environment, so we selected two properties, among the 27 investigated, that shared forest cover, are located adjacent to the RNVSCF, are registered, and possess other attributes favorable to the design of reserves. The two selected properties and the Las Tablillas site were characterized at the level of geological and hydrological attributes and the composition of indicator groups.

Results:

Both properties are physically and biologically favorable for the exchange. It would increase the area of the RNVSCF by more than 100 ha of an environment with better coverage, more diversity, and a better connection to other forest masses than the one observed in the segregation site, which is an advantage to the conservation objective of the refuge.

Conclusion:

In this case, the opportunity cost favored the environmental gain for the offset proposal and could be used to evaluate other compensation involving sensitive or protected environments.

Palabras clave : Las Tablillas; environmental offsets; impact study; ecological equivalence; protected area; SINAC.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )