Objective:

Given that at this time is available at the Costa Rican Social security both trastuzumab for intravenous as for subcutaneous administration, and that the presentation for subcutaneous administration has documented to be not inferior to the intravenous. It is relevant to have a study of cost minimization to investigate what formulation is more convenient to maintain in the public health system, based on criteria of efficiency of the intervention.

Methods:

A study was developed to evaluate, from the financial perspective of the Social Security of Costa Rica, two different options of application of trastuzumab in patients with breast cancer. The related procedures were identified and documented for the two types treatment application. Both treatment options were based on seventeen dose schemes, with the estimate of supplies and the time of the health professional for each possibility. The analysis also included the evaluation from the patient’s perspective.

Results:

The economic evaluation of the application procedure for both alternatives evidenced that the subcutaneous option had an application cost of $78.6 and $467.34 for the intravenous option. From the financial perspective the subcutaneous option constitutes the alternative with lower cost, with a cost around $4000.0 by treatment per patient, and from the patient perspective implies a 45.0% less time for session than then intravenous option.

Conclusions:

Trastuzumab subcutaneous formulation evidenced a substantial time and cost reduction in comparison with the intravenous formulation in the Costa Rican Social Security System.